Absolute Riesz summability of Fourier series. I
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by G. D. Dikshit and C. S. Rees PDF
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (1981), 231-238 Request permission
Abstract:
In this paper we prove some theorems on the absolute summability of Fourier series which connect diverse $\left | {C,\gamma } \right |$ results such as Bosanquet’s classical theorem (1936), Mohanty (1952), and Ray (1970) and the recent $\left | {R,\;\exp ({{(\log \omega )}^{\beta + 1}}),\gamma } \right |$ result of Nayak (1971). It is also shown that in some sense some of the conclusions of the paper are the best possible.References
-
L. S. Bosanquet, Note on the absolute summability $(C)$ of a Fourier series, J. London Math. Soc. 11 (1936), 11-15.
- L. S. Bosanquet and H. C. Chow, Some remarks on convergence and summability factors, J. London Math. Soc. 32 (1957), 73–82. MR 83607, DOI 10.1112/jlms/s1-32.1.73
- K. Chandrasekharan and S. Minakshisundaram, Typical means, Oxford University Press, 1952. MR 0055458
- B. Kuttner, On the ‘second theorem of consistency’ for absolute Riesz summability, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 29 (1974), 17–32. MR 352784, DOI 10.1112/plms/s3-29.1.17
- R. Mohanty, Absolute Cesàro summability of a series associated with a Fourier series, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc. 44 (1952), 152–154. MR 56729
- M. K. Nayak, On the absolute summability and convergence of Fourier series and associated series, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 70 (1971), 421–433. MR 290031, DOI 10.1017/s0305004100050064
- B. K. Ray, On the absolute summability of some series related to a Fourier series, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 67 (1970), 29–45. MR 412719, DOI 10.1017/s0305004100057078
Additional Information
- © Copyright 1981 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 82 (1981), 231-238
- MSC: Primary 42A28; Secondary 40F05
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1981-0609657-1
- MathSciNet review: 609657