|
New results on the average behavior of simplex algorithms
Author(s):
Ilan
Adler;
Nimrod
Megiddo;
Michael J.
Todd
Journal:
Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.
11
(1984),
378-382.
MSC (1980):
Primary 68C25;
Secondary 90C05
MathSciNet review:
752803
Retrieve article in:
PDF
References |
Similar articles |
Additional information
References:
- [A] I. Adler, The expected number of pivots needed to solve parametric linear programs and the efficiency of the self-dual simplex method, Dept. Industrial Engineering and Operations Res., Univ. of California, Berkeley, June 1983.
- [AKS] I. Adler, R. M. Karp and R. Shamir, A simplex variant solving an m × d linear program in O (min (m2, d2)) expected number of steps, Report UCB CSD 83/158, Computer Science Division, Univ. of California, Berkeley, December 1983.
- [AM1] I. Adler and N. Megiddo, A simplex-type algorithm solves linear programming problems of order m × n in only O ((min (m, n))2) steps on the average, November 1983 (manuscript).
- [AM2] I. Adler and N. Megiddo, A simplex algorithm whose average number of steps is bounded between two quadratic functions of the smaller dimension, Proc. 16th Annual ACM Sympos. on Theory of Computing, 1984, pp. 312-323. MR 810342
- [Bl] C. E. Blair, Random linear programs with many variables and few constraints, Faculty Working Paper No. 946, College of Commerce and Business Administration, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, April 1983.
- [Bo1] K.-H. Borgwardt, Some distribution-independent results about the asymptotic order of the average number of pivot steps of the simplex method, Math. Oper. Res. 7 (1982), 441-462. MR 667934
- [Bo2] K.-H. Borgwardt, The average number of steps required by the simplex method is polynomial, Z. Oper. Res. Ser. A-B 26 (1982), 157-177. MR 686603
- [D] G. B. Dantzig, Linear programming and extensions, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J., 1963. MR 201189
- [H] M. Haimovich, The simplex algorithm is very good!--On the expected number of pivot steps and related properties of random linear programs, Columbia Univ., New York, April 1983 (manuscript).
- [KM] V. Klee and G. J. Minty, How good is the simplex algorithm?, Inequalities. III, Academic Press, 1972, pp. 159-175. MR 332165
- [K] L. G. Khachian, A polynomial algorithm in linear programming, Soviet Math. Dokl. 20 (1979), 191-194.
- [Me1] N. Megiddo, Improved asymptotic analysis of the average number of steps performed by the self-dual simplex algorithm, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford Univ., September 1983 (preliminary report).
- [Me2] N. Megiddo, A note on the generality of the self-dual algorithm with various starting points, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford Univ., December 1983 (preliminary report).
- [Mu] K. G. Murty, Computational complexity of parametric linear progmmming, Math. Programming 19 (1980), 213-219. MR 583280
- [S1] S. Smale, On the average number of steps of the simplex method of linear programmming, Math. Programming 27 (1983), 241-267. MR 725621
- [S2] S. Smale, The problem of the average speed of the simplex method, Mathematical Programming: The State of the Art (A. Bachem, M. Grötschel and B. Korte, eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1983, pp. 530-539. MR 717413
- [T] M. J. Todd, Polynomial expected behavior of a pivoting algorithm for linear complementarity and linear programrning problems, Tech. Rep. No. 595, School of Operations Res. and Industrial Enginnering, Cornell Univ., 1983.
Similar Articles:
Retrieve articles in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society
with MSC
(1980):
68C25, 90C05
Retrieve articles in all Journals with MSC
(1980):
68C25, 90C05
Additional Information:
DOI:
10.1090/S0273-0979-1984-15317-5
PII:
S 0273-0979(1984)15317-5
|