Skip to Main Content

Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society

The Bulletin publishes expository articles on contemporary mathematical research, written in a way that gives insight to mathematicians who may not be experts in the particular topic. The Bulletin also publishes reviews of selected books in mathematics and short articles in the Mathematical Perspectives section, both by invitation only.

ISSN 1088-9485 (online) ISSN 0273-0979 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society is 0.84.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

New applications of the polynomial method: The cap set conjecture and beyond
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Joshua A. Grochow PDF
Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 56 (2019), 29-64

Abstract:

The cap set problem asks how large can a subset of $(\mathbb {Z}/3\mathbb {Z})^n$ be and contain no lines or, more generally, how can large a subset of $(\mathbb {Z}/p\mathbb {Z})^n$ be and contain no arithmetic progressions. This problem was motivated by deep questions about structure in the prime numbers, the geometry of lattice points, and the design of statistical experiments. In 2016, Croot, Lev, and Pach solved the analogous problem in $(\mathbb {Z}/4\mathbb {Z})^n$, showing that the largest set without arithmetic progressions had size at most $c^n$ for some $c < 4$. Their proof was as elegant as it was unexpected, being a departure from the tried and true methods of Fourier analysis that had dominated the field for half a century. Shortly thereafter, Ellenberg and Gijswijt leveraged their method to resolve the original cap set problem. This expository article covers the history and motivation for the cap set problem and some of the many applications of the technique: from removing triangles from graphs, to rigidity of matrices, and to algorithms for matrix multiplication. The latter application turns out to give back to the original problem, sharpening our understanding of the techniques involved and of what is needed for showing that the current bounds are tight. Most of our exposition assumes only familiarity with basic linear algebra, polynomials, and the integers modulo $N$.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2010): 11B25, 51E22
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 11B25, 51E22
Additional Information
  • Joshua A. Grochow
  • Affiliation: Department of Computer Science and Department of Mathematics, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado
  • MR Author ID: 930146
  • Email: jgrochow@colorado.edu
  • Received by editor(s): April 22, 2018
  • Published electronically: October 1, 2018
  • © Copyright 2018 Joshua A. Grochow
  • Journal: Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 56 (2019), 29-64
  • MSC (2010): Primary 11B25, 51E22
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/bull/1648
  • MathSciNet review: 3886143