Comments to 1998-002-09
**Comments on article:**

G. Lusztig; *Errata to Bases in equivariant **K*-theory Represent. Theory **2** (1998), pp. 298-369.

*Added September 29, 1999 17:01:45 EDT*

### Comments by the author

### Errata

These errata are available in the following formats:

Return to abstract:

2.18, line 2: delete ``the equality "

3.8(b): replace by

p.314, line 4: replace by

3.14(b): replace by

3.14(c): replace by

p.315, line -2,-1: replace by

p.315, line -1: replace last by

p.316, line 3: replace last by

p.316, line 7: insert after

5.2(a): replace by

5.17: replace ``We apply the identity 5.15(a) with" by ``Let"

5.17: replace ``as in the proof of 5.15" by ``as in the proof of 5.14"

7.9, line 5: replace by

7.9(a): replace by

7.14, line 2: replace by

7.16, line 4: replace ``line bundle" by ``vector bundle"

7.18(a): replace by

7.19, last line: replace by

7.23, 7.24, 7.25: replace by

8.3,8.4: replace by

8.4, line 1,2: replace by

p.337, line 1: delete and replace by ``We have"

p.337, line 2: replace by

8.7, line 2: replace by

8.7(b): replace the last by

8.11: line 4 of proof; replace by

8.11: last line of proof; replace 10.1 by 8.10

9.7, line 1: replace by

p.343, line -3: replace by

10.6, line -5: the last arrow should have a on top

10.8, 10.10, 10.11, 10.12: replace by

10.10, line 2: replace by

11.3, line 3: replace by

11.3: replace by

11.3: replace by

11.4(a): replace by

11.4(b): replace by

11.10: replace by

11.10 (last line): replace by (twice)

12.1-12.4 replace by: Let be as in 11.1. We can find an
opposition of such that and
on . We fix such a .

12.9: replace first two sentences by: ``Let ."

12.18 (beginning) add: Let be the centralizer of in . In the
remainder of this paper we assume that the centralizer of in is
equal to the centre of . Then is uniquely defined by up
to
conjugation by where .

14.2-14.5: replace by the revision in [L7, 2.4] or by 17.2 in this paper.