The stable homotopy category, much studied by algebraic topologists, is a closed symmetric monoidal category. For many years, however, there has been no well-behaved closed symmetric monoidal category of spectra whose homotopy category is the stable homotopy category. In this paper, we present such a category of spectra; the category of symmetric spectra. Our method can be used more generally to invert a monoidal functor, up to homotopy, in a way that preserves monoidal structure. Symmetric spectra were discovered at about the same time as the category of $S$-modules of Elmendorf, Kriz, Mandell, and May, a completely different symmetric monoidal category of spectra.
Introduction
Stable homotopy theory studies spectra as the linear approximation to spaces. Here, “stable” refers to the consideration of spaces after inverting the suspension functor. This approach is a general one: one can often create a simpler category by inverting an operation such as suspension. In this paper we study a particularly simple model for inverting such operations which preserves product structures. The combinatorial nature of this model means that it is easily transported, and hence may be useful in extending the methods of stable homotopy theory to other settings.
The idea of a spectrum is a relatively simple one: Freudenthal’s suspension theorem implies that the sequence of homotopy classes of maps
is eventually constant for finite-dimensional pointed CW-complexes $X$ and $Y$, where $\Sigma X=S^{1}\wedge X$ is the reduced suspension of $X$. This suggests forming a stable category where the suspension functor is an isomorphism. The standard way to do this is to define a spectrum to be a sequence of pointed spaces $X_{n}$ together with structure maps $S^{1}\wedge X_{n}\xrightarrow {}X_{n+1}$. This was first done by Lima Reference Lim59 and later generalized by Whitehead Reference Whi62. The suspension functor is not an isomorphism in the category of spectra, but becomes an isomorphism when we invert the stable homotopy equivalences. The resulting homotopy category of spectra is often called the stable homotopy category and has been extensively studied, beginning with the work of Boardman Reference Vog70 and Adams Reference Ada74 and continuing to this day. Notice that this definition of a spectrum can be applied to any situation where one has an operation on a category that one would like to invert; however, this simplest construction does not preserve the smash product structure coming from spaces.
One of the stable homotopy category’s basic features is that it is symmetric monoidal. There is a smash product, built from the smash product of pointed spaces and analogous to the tensor product of modules, that is associative, commutative, and unital, up to coherent natural isomorphism. However, the category of spectra defined above is not symmetric monoidal. This has been a sticking point for almost forty years now. Indeed, it was long thought that there could be no symmetric monoidal category of spectra; see Reference Lew91, where it is shown that a symmetric monoidal category of spectra cannot have all the properties one might like.
Any good symmetric monoidal category of spectra allows one to perform algebraic constructions on spectra that are impossible without such a category. This is extremely important, for example, in the algebraic $K$-theory of spectra. In particular, given a good symmetric monoidal category of spectra, it is possible to construct a homotopy category of monoids (ring spectra) and of modules over a given monoid.
In this paper, we describe a symmetric monoidal category of spectra, called the category of symmetric spectra. The ordinary category of spectra as described above is the category of modules over the sphere spectrum. The sphere spectrum is a monoid in the category of sequences of spaces, but it is not a commutative monoid, because the twist map on $S^{1}\wedge S^{1}$ is not the identity. This explains why the ordinary category of spectra is not symmetric monoidal, just as in algebra where the usual internal tensor product of modules is defined only over a commutative ring. To make the sphere spectrum a commutative monoid, we need to keep track of the twist map, and, more generally, of permutations of coordinates. We therefore define a symmetric spectrum to be a sequence of pointed simplicial sets $X_{n}$ together with a pointed action of the permutation group $\Sigma _{n}$ on $X_{n}$ and equivariant structure maps $S^{1}\wedge X_{n}\xrightarrow {}X_{n+1}$. We must also require that the iterated structure maps $S^{p}\wedge X_{n}\xrightarrow {}X_{n+p}$ be $\Sigma _{p}\times \Sigma _{n}$-equivariant. This idea is due to the third author; the first and second authors joined the project later.
At approximately the same time as the third author discovered symmetric spectra, the team of Elmendorf, Kriz, Mandell, and May Reference EKMM97 also constructed a symmetric monoidal category of spectra, called $S$-modules. Some generalizations of symmetric spectra appear in Reference MMSS98a. These many new symmetric monoidal categories of spectra, including $S$-modules and symmetric spectra, are shown to be equivalent in an appropriate sense in Reference MMSS98b and Reference Sch98. Another symmetric monoidal category of spectra sitting between the approaches of Reference EKMM97 and of this paper is developed in Reference DS. We also point out that symmetric spectra are part of a more general theory of localization of model categories Reference Hir99; we have not adopted this approach, but both Reference Hir99 and Reference DHK have influenced us considerably.
Symmetric spectra have already proved useful. In Reference GH97, symmetric spectra are used to extend the definition of topological cyclic homology from rings to schemes. Similarly, in Reference Shi, Bökstedt’s approach to topological Hochschild homology Reference Bök85 is extended to symmetric ring spectra, without connectivity conditions. And in Reference SS, it is shown that any linear model category is Quillen equivalent to a model category of modules over a symmetric ring spectrum.
As mentioned above, since the construction of symmetric spectra is combinatorial in nature it may be applied in many different situations. Given any well-behaved symmetric monoidal model category, such as chain complexes, simplicial sets, or topological spaces, and an endofunctor on it that respects the monoidal structure, one can define symmetric spectra. This more general approach is explored in Reference Hov98b. In particular, symmetric spectra may be the logical way to construct a model structure for Voevodsky’s stable homotopy of schemes Reference Voe97.
In this paper, we can only begin the study of symmetric spectra. The most significant loose end is the construction of a model category of commutative symmetric ring spectra; such a model category has been constructed by the third author in work in progress. It would also be useful to have a stable fibrant replacement functor, as the usual construction $QX$ does not work in general. A good approximation to such a functor is constructed in Reference Shi.
At present the theory of $S$-modules of Reference EKMM97 is considerably more developed than the theory of symmetric spectra. Their construction appears to be significantly different from symmetric spectra; however, Reference Sch98 shows that the two approaches define equivalent stable homotopy categories and equivalent homotopy categories of monoids and modules, as would be expected. Each approach has its own advantages. The category of symmetric spectra is technically much simpler than the $S$-modules of Reference EKMM97; this paper is almost entirely self-contained, depending only on some standard results about simplicial sets. As discussed above, symmetric spectra can be built in many different circumstances, whereas $S$-modules appear to be tied to the category of topological spaces. There are also technical differences reflecting the result of Reference Lew91 that there are limitations on any symmetric monoidal category of spectra. For example, the sphere spectrum $S$ is cofibrant in the category of symmetric spectra, but is not in the category of $S$-modules. On the other hand, every $S$-module is fibrant, a considerable technical advantage. Also, the $S$-modules of Reference EKMM97 are very well suited to the varying universes that arise in equivariant stable homotopy theory, whereas we do not yet know how to realize universes in symmetric spectra. For a first step in this direction see Reference SS.
Organization
The paper is organized as follows. We choose to work in the category of simplicial sets. In the first section, we define symmetric spectra, give some examples, and establish some basic properties. In Section 2 we describe the closed symmetric monoidal structure on the category of symmetric spectra, and explain why such a structure cannot exist in the ordinary category of spectra. In Section 3 we study the stable homotopy theory of symmetric spectra. This section is where the main subtlety of the theory of symmetric spectra arises: we cannot define stable equivalence by using stable homotopy isomorphisms. Instead, we define a map to be a stable equivalence if it is a cohomology isomorphism for all cohomology theories. The main result of this section is that symmetric spectra, together with stable equivalences and suitably defined classes of stable fibrations and stable cofibrations, form a model category. As expected, the fibrant objects are the $\Omega$-spectra;i.e., symmetric spectra $X$ such that each $X_{n}$ is a Kan complex and the adjoint $X_{n}\xrightarrow {}X_{n+1}^{S^{1}}$ of the structure map is a weak equivalence. In Section 4, we prove that the stable homotopy theories of symmetric spectra and ordinary spectra are equivalent. More precisely, we construct a Quillen equivalence of model categories between symmetric spectra and the model category of ordinary spectra described in Reference BF78.
In Section 5 we discuss some of the properties of symmetric spectra. In particular, in Section 5.1, we tie up a loose end from Section 3 by establishing two different model categories of symmetric spectra where the weak equivalences are the level equivalences. We characterize the stable cofibrations of symmetric spectra in Section 5.2. In Section 5.3, we show that the smash product of symmetric spectra interacts with the model structure in the expected way. This section is crucial for the applications of symmetric spectra, and, in particular, is necessary to be sure that the smash product of symmetric spectra does define a symmetric monoidal structure on the stable homotopy category. We establish that symmetric spectra are a proper model category in Section 5.5, and use this to verify the monoid axiom in Section 5.4. The monoid axiom is required to construct model categories of monoids and of modules over a given monoid; see Reference SS97. In Section 5.6, we define semistable spectra, which are helpful for understanding the difference between stable equivalences and stable homotopy equivalences.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dan Christensen, Bill Dwyer, Phil Hirschhorn, Dan Kan, Haynes Miller, John Palmieri, Charles Rezk, and Stefan Schwede for many helpful conversations about symmetric spectra.
1. Symmetric spectra
In this section we construct the category of symmetric spectra over simplicial sets. We begin this section by recalling the basic facts about simplicial sets in Section 1.1, then we define symmetric spectra in Section 1.2. We describe the simplicial structure on the category of symmetric spectra in Section 1.3. The homotopy category of symmetric $\Omega$-spectra is described in Section 1.4.
The category $\Delta$ has the ordered sets $[n]=\{0,1,\dots ,n\}$ for $n\ge 0$ as its objects and the order preserving functions $[n]\to [m]$ as its maps. The category of simplicial sets, denoted $\mathcal{S}$, is the category of functors from $\Delta ^{\text{op}}$ to the category of sets. The set of $n$-simplices of the simplicial set $X$, denoted $X_n$, is the value of the functor $X$ at $[n]$. The standard $n$-simplex$\Delta [n]$ is the contravariant functor $\Delta (-,[n])$. Varying $n$ gives a covariant functor $\Delta [-]\colon \,\Delta \to \mathcal{S}$. By the Yoneda lemma, $\mathcal{S}(\Delta [n],X)=X_n$ and the contravariant functor $\mathcal{S}(\Delta [-],X)$ is naturally isomorphic to $X$.
Let $G$ be a discrete group. The category of $G$-simplicial sets is the category $\mathcal{S}^G$ of functors from $G$ to $\mathcal{S}$, where $G$ is regarded as a category with one object. A $G$-simplicial set is therefore a simplicial set $X$ with a left simplicial $G$-action,i.e., a homomorphism $G\to \mathcal{S}(X,X)$.
A basepoint of a simplicial set $X$ is a distinguished $0$-simplex$*\in X_0$. The category of pointed simplicial sets and basepoint preserving maps is denoted $\mathcal{S}_{*}$. The simplicial set $\Delta [0]=\Delta (-,[0])$ has a single simplex in each degree and is the terminal object in $\mathcal{S}$. A basepoint of $X$ is the same as a map $\Delta [0]\to X$. The disjoint union $X_+=X\amalg \Delta [0]$ adds a disjoint basepoint to the simplicial set $X$. For example, the $0$-sphere is $S^0=\Delta [0]_+$. A basepoint of a $G$-simplicial set $X$ is a $G$-invariant$0$-simplex of $X$. The category of pointed $G$-simplicial sets is denoted $\mathcal{S}_{*}^G$.
The smash product $X\wedge Y$ of the pointed simplicial sets $X$ and $Y$ is the quotient $(X\times Y)/(X\vee Y)$ that collapses the simplicial subset $X\vee Y=X\times *\cup *\times Y$ to a point. For pointed $G$-simplicial sets $X$ and $Y$, let $X\wedge _G Y$ be the quotient of $X\wedge Y$ by the diagonal action of $G$. For pointed simplicial sets $X$,$Y$, and $Z$, there are natural isomorphisms $(X\wedge Y)\wedge Z\cong X\wedge (Y\wedge Z)$,$X\wedge Y\cong Y\wedge X$ and $X\wedge S^0 \cong X$. In the language of monoidal categories, the smash product is a symmetric monoidal product on the category of pointed simplicial sets. We recall the definition of symmetric monoidal product, but for more details see Reference ML71, VII or Reference Bor94, 6.1.
Coherence of the natural isomorphisms means that all reasonable diagrams built from the natural isomorphisms also commute Reference ML71. When the product is closed, the pairing $\operatorname {Hom}(X,Y)\colon \,\mathcal{C}^{\text{op}}\times \mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{C}$ is an internal Hom. For example, the smash product on the category $\mathcal{S}_{*}$ of pointed simplicial sets is closed. For $X,Y\in \mathcal{S}_{*}$, the pointed simplicial set of maps from $X$ to $Y$ is $\operatorname {Map}_{\mathcal{S}_{*}}(X,Y)=\mathcal{S}_{*}(X\wedge \Delta [-]_+,Y)$. For pointed $G$-simplicial sets $X$ and $Y$, the simplicial subset of $G$-equivariant pointed maps is $\operatorname {Map}_G(X,Y)=\mathcal{S}_{*}^G(X\wedge \Delta [-]_+,Y)$.
1.2. Symmetric spectra
Let $S^1$ be the simplicial circle $\Delta [1]/\partial \Delta [1]$, obtained by identifying the two vertices of $\Delta [1]$.
Replacing the sequence of pointed simplicial sets by a sequence of pointed topological spaces in 1.2.1 gives the original definition of a spectrum (due to Whitehead and Lima). The categories of simplicial spectra and of topological spectra are discussed in the work of Bousfield and Friedlander Reference BF78.
A symmetric spectrum is a spectrum to which symmetric group actions have been added. Let $\Sigma _p$ be the group of permutations of the set $\overline{p}=\{1,2,\dots ,p\}$, with $\overline{0}=\emptyset$. As usual, embed $\Sigma _p\times \Sigma _q$ as the subgroup of $\Sigma _{p+q}$ with $\Sigma _p$ acting on the first $p$ elements of $\overline{p+q}$ and $\Sigma _q$ acting on the last $q$ elements of $\overline{p+q}$. Let $S^p=(S^{1})^{\wedge p}$ be the $p$-fold smash power of the simplicial circle with the left permutation action of $\Sigma _p$.
A symmetric spectrum with values in a simplicial category $\mathcal{C}$ is obtained by replacing the sequence of pointed simplicial sets by a sequence of pointed objects in $\mathcal{C}$. In particular, a topological symmetric spectrum is a symmetric spectrum with values in the simplicial category of topological spaces.
By ignoring group actions, a symmetric spectrum is a spectrum and a map of symmetric spectra is a map of spectra. When no confusion can arise, the adjective “symmetric” may be dropped.
Since the action of $\Sigma _n$ on $S^n$ is non-trivial for $n\ge 2$, it is usually impossible to obtain a symmetric spectrum from a spectrum by letting $\Sigma _n$ act trivially on $X_n$. However, many of the usual functors to the category of spectra lift to the category of symmetric spectra. For example, the suspension spectrum of a pointed simplicial set $K$ is the underlying spectrum of the symmetric suspension spectrum of $K$.
Many examples of symmetric spectra and of functors on the category of symmetric spectra are constructed by prolongation of simplicial functors.
In particular, the underlying sequence of the limit is $(\lim D)_n=\lim D_n$ and the underlying sequence of the colimit is $(\operatorname {colim}D)_n=\operatorname {colim}D_n$.
1.3. Simplicial structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$
For a pointed simplicial set $K$ and a symmetric spectrum $X$, prolongation of the $\mathcal{S}_{*}$-functor$(-)\wedge K \colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}\to \mathcal{S}_{*}$ defines the smash product$X\wedge K$ and prolongation of the $\mathcal{S}_{*}$-functor$(-)^K\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}\to \mathcal{S}_{*}$ defines the power spectrum$X^K$. For symmetric spectra $X$ and $Y$, the pointed simplicial set of maps from $X$ to $Y$ is $\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,Y)=Sp^{\Sigma }(X\wedge \Delta [-]_+, Y)$.
In the language of enriched category theory, the following proposition says that the smash product $X \wedge K$ is a closed action of $\mathcal{S}_{*}$ on $Sp^{\Sigma }$. We leave the straightforward proof to the reader.
The evaluation map$X\wedge \operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }} (X,Y)\to Y$ is the adjoint of the identity map on $\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,Y)$. The composition pairing
of two evaluation maps. In the language of enriched category theory, a category with a closed action of $\mathcal{S}_{*}$ is the same as a tensored and cotensored $\mathcal{S}_{*}$-category. The following proposition, whose proof we also leave to the reader, expresses this fact.
Proposition 1.3.1 says that certain functors are adjoints, whereas Proposition 1.3.2 says more; they are simplicial adjoints.
The category of symmetric spectra satisfies Quillen’s axiom SM7 for simplicial model categories.
Recall that a map of simplicial sets is a weak equivalence if its geometric realization is a homotopy equivalence of CW-complexes. One of the basic properties of simplicial sets, proved in Reference Qui67, II.3, is:
Prolongation gives a corollary for symmetric spectra. A map $f$ of symmetric spectra is a monomorphism if $f_n$ is a monomorphism of simplicial sets for each $n\ge 0$.
By definition, a $0$-simplex of $\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,Y)$ is a map $X\wedge \Delta [0]_+\to Y$, but $X\wedge \Delta [0]_+\cong X$ and so a $0$-simplex of $\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,Y)$ is a map $X\to Y$. A $1$-simplex of $\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,Y)$ is a simplicial homotopy$H\colon \,X\wedge \Delta [1]_+\to Y$ from $H\circ (X\wedge i_0)$ to $H\circ (X\wedge i_1)$ where $i_0$ and $i_1$ are the two inclusions $\Delta [0]\to \Delta [1]$. Simplicial homotopy generates an equivalence relation on $Sp^{\Sigma }(X,Y)$ and the quotient is $\pi _0\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,Y)$. A map $f\colon \,X \to Y$ is a simplicial homotopy equivalence if it has a simplicial homotopy inverse, i.e., a map $g\colon \,Y\to X$ such that $gf$ is simplicially homotopic to the identity map on $X$ and $fg$ is simplicially homotopic to the identity map on $Y$. If $f$ is a simplicial homotopy equivalence of symmetric spectra, then each of the maps $f_n$ is a simplicial homotopy equivalence, and so each of the maps $f_n$ is a weak equivalence. Every simplicial homotopy equivalence is therefore a level equivalence. The converse is false; a map can be a level equivalence and NOT a simplicial homotopy equivalence.
1.4. Symmetric $\Omega$-spectra
The stable homotopy category can be defined using $\Omega$-spectra and level equivalences.
Let $\Omega Sp^{\mathbb{N}}\subseteq Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ be the full subcategory of $\Omega$-spectra. The homotopy category $\operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\mathbb{N}})$ is obtained from $\Omega Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ by formally inverting the level equivalences. By the results in Reference BF78, the category $\operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\mathbb{N}})$ is naturally equivalent to Boardman’s stable homotopy category (or any other). Likewise, let $\Omega Sp^{\Sigma }\subseteq Sp^{\Sigma }$ be the full subcategory of symmetric $\Omega$-spectra (i.e., symmetric spectra $X$ for which $UX$ is an $\Omega$-spectrum). The homotopy category $\operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\Sigma })$ is obtained from $\Omega Sp^{\Sigma }$ by formally inverting the level equivalences. Since the forgetful functor $U\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\to Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ preserves $\Omega$-spectra and level equivalences, it induces a functor $\operatorname {Ho}(U)\colon \,\operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\Sigma })\to \operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\mathbb{N}})$. As a corollary of Theorem 4.2.5, the functor $\operatorname {Ho}(U)$ is a natural equivalence of categories. Thus the category $\operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\Sigma })$ is naturally equivalent to Boardman’s stable homotopy category. To describe an inverse of $\operatorname {Ho}(U)$, let $\Omega ^\infty \colon \,Sp^{\mathbb{N}}\to \mathcal{S}_{*}$ be the functor that takes a spectrum to the $0$-space of its associated $\Omega$-spectrum. For any spectrum $E\in Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$, the symmetric spectrum $VE=\Omega ^\infty (E\wedge S)$ is the value of the prolongation of the $\mathcal{S}_{*}$-functor$\Omega ^\infty (E\wedge -)$ at the symmetric sphere spectrum $S$; the underlying sequence is $VE_n=\Omega ^\infty (E\wedge S^n)$. The functor $V$ preserves $\Omega$-spectra, preserves level equivalences, and induces a functor $\operatorname {Ho}(V)\colon \,\operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\mathbb{N}})\to \operatorname {Ho}(\Omega Sp^{\Sigma })$ which is a natural inverse of $\operatorname {Ho}(U)$.
The category of symmetric $\Omega$-spectra has major defects. It is not closed under limits and colimits, or even under pushouts and pullbacks. The smash product, defined in Section 2, of symmetric $\Omega$-spectra is a symmetric spectrum but not an $\Omega$-spectrum, except in trivial cases. For these reasons it is better to work with the category of all symmetric spectra. But then the notion of level equivalence is no longer adequate; the stable homotopy category is a retract of the homotopy category obtained from $Sp^{\Sigma }$ by formally inverting the level equivalences but many symmetric spectra are not level equivalent to an $\Omega$-spectrum. One must enlarge the class of equivalences. The stable equivalences of symmetric spectra are defined in Section 3.1. By Theorem 4.2.5, the homotopy category obtained from $Sp^{\Sigma }$ by inverting the stable equivalences is naturally equivalent to the stable homotopy category.
2. The smash product of symmetric spectra
In this section we construct the closed symmetric monoidal product on the category of symmetric spectra. A symmetric spectrum can be viewed as a module over the symmetric sphere spectrum $S$, and the symmetric sphere spectrum (unlike the ordinary sphere spectrum) is a commutative monoid in an appropriate category. The smash product of symmetric spectra is the tensor product over $S$.
The closed symmetric monoidal category of symmetric sequences is constructed in Section 2.1. A reformulation of the definition of a symmetric spectrum is given in Section 2.2 where we recall the definition of monoids and modules in a symmetric monoidal category. In Section 2.3 we see that there is no closed symmetric monoidal smash product on the category of (non-symmetric) spectra.
2.1. Symmetric sequences
Every symmetric spectrum has an underlying sequence $X_0,X_1,\dots ,X_{n},\dots$ of pointed simplicial sets with a basepoint preserving left action of $\Sigma _n$ on $X_n$; these are called symmetric sequences. In this section we define the closed symmetric monoidal category of symmetric sequences of pointed simplicial sets.
A symmetric sequence $X\in \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$ is a sequence $X_0,X_1,\dots ,X_{n},\dots$ of pointed simplicial sets with a basepoint preserving left action of $\Sigma _n$ on $X_n$. The category $\mathcal{C}^\Sigma$ is a product category. In particular, $\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }(X,Y)=\prod _p\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma _{p}}(X_p,Y_p)$.
The tensor product of symmetric sequences has the universal property for “bilinear maps”:
The twist isomorphism$\tau \colon \,X \otimes Y \to Y \otimes X$ for $X,Y\in \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$ is the natural map given by $\tau (\alpha ,x,y)=(\alpha \rho _{q,p},y,x)$ for $\alpha \in \Sigma _{p+q}$,$x\in X_p$, and $y\in Y_q$, where $\rho _{q,p}\in \Sigma _{p+q}$ is the $(q,p)$-shuffle given by $\rho _{q,p}(i)=i+p$ for $1\le i\le q$ and $\rho _{q,p}(i)=i-q$ for $q<i\le p+q$. The map defined without the shuffle permutation is not a map of symmetric sequences.
We now introduce several functors on the category of symmetric sequences.
For each $n\ge 0$, the free symmetric sequence is $\Sigma [n]=\Sigma (\overline{n},-)$ and the free functor is $G_n=\Sigma [n]_+ \wedge -\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}\to \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$. So, for a pointed simplicial set $K$,$(G_nK)_n=(\Sigma _n)_+\wedge K$ and $(G_nK)_k=*$ for $k\neq n$. In particular, $G_nS^0=\Sigma [n]_+$,$G_0K=(K,*,*,\dots )$ and $G_0S^0$ is the unit of the tensor product $\otimes$.
We leave the proof of the following basic proposition to the reader.
A map $f$ of symmetric sequences is a level equivalence if each of the maps $f_n$ is a weak equivalence. Since $\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$ is a product category, a map $f$ of symmetric sequences is a monomorphism if and only if each of the maps $f_n$ is a monomorphism.
By part three of Proposition 2.1.8, $\operatorname {Map}(\Sigma [n]_+,X)\cong X_n$. As $n$ varies, $\Sigma [-]_+$ is a functor $\Sigma ^{\text{op}}\to \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$, and for $X\in \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$, the symmetric sequence $\operatorname {Map}_{\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }}(\Sigma [-]_+,X)$ is naturally isomorphic to $X$.
2.2. Symmetric spectra
In this section we apply the language of “monoids” and “modules” in a symmetric monoidal category to the category of symmetric sequences. See Reference ML71Reference Bor94 for background on monoidal categories. In this language, the symmetric sequence of spheres $S=(S^0,S^1,\dots ,S^n,\dots )$ is a commutative monoid in the category of symmetric sequences and a symmetric spectrum is a (left) $S$-module.
Consider the symmetric sphere spectrum $S$. By Proposition 2.1.4, the natural $\Sigma _p\times \Sigma _q$-equivariant maps $m_{p,q}\colon \,S^p\wedge S^q\to S^{p+q}$ give a pairing $m\colon \,S\otimes S\to S$. The adjoint $G_0S^0\to S$ of the identity map $S^0\to \operatorname {Ev}_0S=S^0$ is a two-sided unit of the pairing. The diagram of natural isomorphisms
commutes, showing that $m$ is an associative pairing of symmetric sequences.
In the language of monoidal categories, $S$ is a monoid in the category of symmetric sequences and a symmetric spectrum is a left $S$-module.
Moreover, $S$ is a commutative monoid, i.e., $m=m \circ \tau$, where $\tau$ is the twist isomorphism. To see this, one can use either the definition of the twist isomorphism or the description given in Remark 2.1.5. Then, as is the case for commutative monoids in the category of sets and for commutative monoids in the category of abelian groups (i.e., commutative rings), there is a tensor product $\otimes _S$, having $S$ as the unit. This gives a symmetric monoidal product on the category of $S$-modules. The smash product $X\wedge Y$ of $X,Y\in Sp^{\Sigma }$ is the symmetric spectrum $X\otimes _S Y$.
The smash product on the category of symmetric spectra is a special case of the following lemma.
We leave the proof of this lemma to the reader; the main point is the following definition.
Apply Lemma 2.2.2 to the commutative monoid $S$ in the bicomplete category of symmetric sequences $\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$ to obtain the following corollary.
Next, some important functors on the category of symmetric spectra.
The functor $S\otimes (-)$ is left adjoint to the forgetful functor $Sp^{\Sigma }\to \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$. The free functor $F_n$ is the composition $S\otimes G_n$ of the left adjoints $G_n\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}\to \mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$ (Definition 2.1.7) and $S\otimes (-)\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }\to Sp^{\Sigma }$. Thus, for $X\in Sp^{\Sigma }$ and $K\in \mathcal{S}_{*}$, the left $S$-module$X\wedge F_nK$ is naturally isomorphic to the left $S$-module$X\otimes G_nK$. In particular, $X\wedge F_0K$ is naturally isomorphic to the symmetric spectrum $X\wedge K$ defined by prolongation in Section 1.3. Furthermore $F_0K=S\wedge K$ is the symmetric suspension spectrum $\Sigma ^\infty K$ of $K$, and $F_0S^0$ is the symmetric sphere spectrum $S$. For a pointed simplicial set $K$,$R_nK$ is the symmetric sequence $\operatorname {Hom}_{\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }}(S,K^{\Sigma (-,\overline{n})_+})$, which is a left $S$-module since $S$ is a right $S$-module.
We leave the proof of the following proposition to the reader.
The internal Hom on the category of symmetric spectra is a special case of the following lemma.
Again, we leave the proof of this lemma to the reader, but the main definition follows.
The adjunction is also a simplicial adjunction and an internal adjunction.
2.3. The ordinary category of spectra
An approach similar to the last two sections can be used to describe (non-symmetric) spectra as modules over the sphere spectrum in a symmetric monoidal category. But in this case the sphere spectrum is not a commutative monoid, which is why there is no closed symmetric monoidal smash product of spectra.
The twist map on $S^1\wedge S^1$ is not the identity map and thus $S$ is not a commutative monoid in $\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\mathbb{N}}$. In fact, $S$ is a free monoid (Section 4.3). Therefore the approach taken in Section 2.2 does not provide a closed symmetric monoidal smash product on the ordinary category of spectra.
3. Stable homotopy theory of symmetric spectra
To use symmetric spectra for the study of stable homotopy theory, one should have a stable model category of symmetric spectra such that the category obtained by inverting the stable equivalences is naturally equivalent to Boardman’s stable homotopy category of spectra (or to any other known to be equivalent to Boardman’s). In this section we define the stable model category of symmetric spectra. In Section 4 we show that it is Quillen equivalent to the stable model category of spectra discussed in Reference BF78.
In Section 3.1 we define the class of stable equivalences of symmetric spectra and discuss its non-trivial relationship to the class of stable equivalences of (non-symmetric) spectra. In Section 3.2 we recall the axioms and basic theory of model categories. In Section 3.3 we discuss the level structure in $Sp^{\Sigma }$, and in Section 3.4 we define the stable model structure on the category of symmetric spectra which has the stable equivalences as the class of weak equivalences. The rest of the section is devoted to checking that the stable model structure satisfies the axioms of a model category.
3.1. Stable equivalence
One’s first inclination is to define stable equivalence using the forgetful functor $U\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\to Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$; one would like a map $f$ of symmetric spectra to be a stable equivalence if the underlying map $Uf$ of spectra is a stable equivalence, i.e., if $Uf$ induces an isomorphism of stable homotopy groups. The reader is warned: THIS WILL NOT WORK. Instead, stable equivalence is defined using cohomology; a map $f$ of symmetric spectra is a stable equivalence if the induced map $E^*f$ of cohomology groups is an isomorphism for every generalized cohomology theory $E$. The two alternatives, using stable homotopy groups or using cohomology groups, give equivalent definitions on the category of (non-symmetric) spectra but not on the category of symmetric spectra.
It would be nice if the $0$th cohomology group of the symmetric spectrum $X$ with coefficients in the symmetric $\Omega$-spectrum$E$ could be defined as $\pi _0\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(X,E)$, the set of simplicial homotopy classes of maps from $X$ to $E$. But, even though the contravariant functor $E^0=\pi _0\operatorname {Map}_{Sp^{\Sigma }}(-,E)$ takes simplicial homotopy equivalences to isomorphisms, $E^0$ may not take level equivalences to isomorphisms. This is a common occurrence in simplicial categories, but is a problem as every level equivalence should induce an isomorphism of cohomology groups; a level equivalence certainly induces an isomorphism of stable homotopy groups. We introduce injective spectra as a class of spectra $E$ for which the functor $E^0$ behaves correctly.
Some examples of injective spectra follow. Recall that $R_n\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}\to Sp^{\Sigma }$ is the right adjoint of the evaluation functor $\operatorname {Ev}_n\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\to \mathcal{S}_{*}$. Also recall that a Kan complex has the extension property with respect to every map of pointed simplicial sets that is a monomorphism and a weak equivalence.
In fact, injective spectra are the fibrant objects of a model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ for which every object is cofibrant (Section 5.1). In particular, as we will see in Corollary 5.1.3, there are enough injectives; every symmetric spectrum embeds in an injective spectrum by a map that is a level equivalence.
There are two other ways to define stable equivalence.
The basic properties of injective spectra which are needed in the rest of this section are stated in the following lemma.
The proof uses the following construction.
Restricting part one of Lemma 3.1.6 to injective $\Omega$-spectra gives:
Next recall the definition of stable homotopy equivalence in the category of (non-symmetric) spectra $Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$.
A map of spectra $f\in Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ is a stable homotopy equivalence if $\pi _*f$ is an isomorphism. For example, every level equivalence in $Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ is a stable homotopy equivalence as it induces an isomorphism of homotopy groups. We do not define stable equivalence of symmetric spectra in this way; as the following example shows, a stable equivalence of symmetric spectra need not induce an isomorphism of homotopy groups.
The forgetful functor $U\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\to Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ does not preserve stable equivalences. On the other hand, the functor $U$ does reflect stable equivalences.
As a corollary some of the standard results about spectra translate into results about symmetric spectra.
Once we have the stable model category of symmetric spectra, part three of this theorem tells us that it really is stable; i.e., that the suspension functor $-\wedge S^1$ is an equivalence of model categories.
3.2. Model categories
In this section we recall the definition and the basic properties of model categories; see Reference DS95, Reference Hov98a, or Reference DHK for a more detailed introduction.
It would be more accurate to say that the pair $(f,g)$ has the lifting-extension property but we prefer the shorter term.
Three classes of maps that satisfy axioms M2, M3, M4 and M5 are a model structure on the category. One should keep in mind that a category can have more than one model structure; there can even be distinct model structures with the same class of weak equivalences.
A bicomplete category has an initial object $\emptyset$ and a terminal object $*$. In a model category, an object $X$ is cofibrant if the unique map $\emptyset \to X$ is a cofibration and an object $X$ is fibrant if the unique map $X\to *$ is a fibration. A model category is pointed if the unique map $\emptyset \to *$ is an isomorphism.
The following proposition is a converse to the lifting axiom.
In particular, any two of the three classes of maps in a model category determine the third. For example, a weak equivalence is a map that factors as a trivial cofibration composed with a trivial fibration.
When constructing a model category, the factorization axiom can be the hardest to verify. After some preliminary definitions, Lemma 3.2.11 constructs functorial factorizations in the category of symmetric spectra.
Injective and projective are dual notions; an $I$-injective map in $\mathcal{C}$ is an $I$-projective map in $\mathcal{C}^{\text{op}}$; an $I$-fibration in $\mathcal{C}$ is an $I$-cofibration in $\mathcal{C}^{\text{op}}$. The class $I\text{-inj}$ and the class $I\text{-proj}$ are analogous to the orthogonal complement of a set of vectors. This analogy helps explain the following proposition, whose proof we leave to the reader.
Another useful elementary lemma about the lifting property is the following.
The next lemma is used repeatedly to construct factorizations.
The factorization lemma is proved using the transfinite small object argument. We begin by showing that every symmetric spectrum is suitably small.
Recall that an ordinal is, by recursive definition, the well-ordered set of all smaller ordinals. In particular, we can regard an ordinal as a category. A cardinal is an ordinal of larger cardinality than all smaller ordinals.
Every $\gamma$-filtered ordinal is a limit ordinal. In fact, since $\gamma$ is infinite, every $\gamma$-filtered ordinal is a limit ordinal $\alpha$ for which there is no countable set $A$ of ordinals less than $\alpha$ such that $\sup A=\alpha$. The smallest $\gamma$-filtered ordinal is the first ordinal of cardinality greater than $\gamma$. For example, $\omega _1$ is the smallest $\aleph _0$-filtered ordinal. If $\gamma <\overline{\gamma }$ and $\alpha$ is $\overline{\gamma }$-filtered, then $\alpha$ is $\gamma$-filtered.
Define the cardinality of a spectrum $X$ to be the cardinality of its underlying set $\amalg _n\amalg _k (\operatorname {Ev}_nX)_k$. Then the cardinality of $X$ is always infinite, which is convenient for the following lemma.
3.3. Level structure
Prolongation of the model structure on $\mathcal{S}_{*}$ (see 3.2.6) gives the level structure on the category of symmetric spectra. It is not a model structure but it is a basic tool in the construction of the stable model structure. Its use is already implicit in Sections 1.3 and 3.1.
The level cofibrations are the monomorphisms of symmetric spectra. Next, we characterize the level fibrations and trivial fibrations.
The level structure is not a model structure; it satisfies the two-out-of-three axiom, the retract axiom, and the factorization axiom but not the lifting axiom. A model structure is determined by any two of its three classes and so the level structure is overdetermined. In Section 5.1 we prove there are two “level” model structures with the level equivalences as the weak equivalences: one that is generated by the level equivalences and the level cofibrations and one that is generated by the level equivalences and the level fibrations. In any case, the level homotopy category obtained by inverting the level equivalences is not the stable homotopy category of spectra.
The pushout smash product (Definition 1.3.3) has an adjoint construction.
A pair $(f,g)$ has the lifting property if and only if $\mathcal{C}_\square (f,g)$ is surjective.
In fact this proposition holds in any simplicial model category.
3.4. Stable model category
In this section we define the stable cofibrations and the stable fibrations of symmetric spectra. The main result is that the class of stable equivalences, the class of stable cofibrations, and the class of stable fibrations are a model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$.
Recall that $f$ is a level trivial fibration if $f_n$ is a trivial Kan fibration for each $n\ge 0$.
The basic properties of the class of stable cofibrations are next.
The next definition is natural in view of the closure properties in a model category; see Proposition 3.2.5.
The following lemma will finish the proof of Theorem 3.4.4.
To prove the lemma we need a set of maps $J$ such that a $J$-cofibration is a stable trivial cofibration and a $J$-injective map is a stable fibration. Using the Factorization Lemma with the set $J$ will prove Lemma 3.4.8. The set $J$ is defined in 3.4.9 and Corollary 3.4.16 verifies its properties. This takes up the rest of the section.
The maps $\lambda \wedge F_nS^0$ used in the definition below appeared in the description of the function spectrum in Remark 2.2.12. They are stable equivalences (see Example 3.1.10) but are not stable cofibrations or even level cofibrations. We modify them to get the set $J$.
Next we characterize the $J$-injective maps.
We also get the following corollary, which is not needed in the sequel. Its proof uses properness (see Section 5.5).
The next corollary finishes the proof of Lemma 3.4.8.
In particular, Lemma 3.4.12 characterizes the stable fibrations. The stably fibrant objects are the $\Omega$-spectra by Corollary 3.4.13. Corollary 3.4.16 finishes the proof of Lemma 3.4.8 and the verification of the axioms for the stable model category of symmetric spectra.
4. Comparison with the Bousfield-Friedlander category
The goal of this section is to show that the stable homotopy theory of symmetric spectra and the stable homotopy theory of spectra are equivalent. We begin in Section 4.1 by recalling the general theory of Quillen equivalences of model categories. In Section 4.2 we provide a brief recap of the stable homotopy theory of (non-symmetric) spectra and we show that the forgetful functor $U$ from symmetric spectra to spectra is part of a Quillen equivalence. The left adjoint $V$ of $U$ plays very little role in this proof, beyond its existence, so we postpone its construction to Section 4.3.
4.1. Quillen equivalences
In this section, we briefly recall Quillen functors and Quillen equivalences between model categories.
The definition of a Quillen adjoint pair can be reformulated.
This lemma is an immediate corollary of Lemma 3.2.10; see also Reference DS95, 9.8. A useful lemma associated to these questions is Ken Brown’s lemma.
In particular, a left Quillen functor $L$ preserves weak equivalences between cofibrant objects, and a right Quillen functor $R$ preserves weak equivalences between fibrant objects.
The following proposition is the reason Quillen equivalences are important.
We now describe a useful sufficient condition for a Quillen adjoint pair to be a Quillen equivalence.
In practice, very few functors detect and preserve weak equivalences on the whole category. However, many functors detect and preserve weak equivalences between cofibrant objects or fibrant objects, so the next lemma is often useful. Before stating it, we need a definition.
There is a dual notion of a cofibrant replacement functor, but we do not use it. Fibrant replacement functors are usually obtained by using a version of the Factorization Lemma 3.2.11 appropriate for $\mathcal{C}$ to functorially factor the map $X\xrightarrow {}1$ into a trivial cofibration followed by a fibration. We have already used fibrant replacement functors in $\mathcal{S}_{*}$ in the proof of Theorem 3.1.11.
There is also a dual statement, but this is the criterion we use.
4.2. The Quillen equivalence
In this section we first recall from Reference BF78 the stable homotopy theory of (non-symmetric) spectra. The goal of this section is to show that the forgetful functor $U$ from symmetric spectra to spectra is part of a Quillen equivalence. Obviously this requires that $U$ have a left adjoint $V\colon \,Sp^{\mathbb{N}}\xrightarrow {}Sp^{\Sigma }$. We will assume the existence of $V$ in this section, and construct $V$ in Section 4.3.
Before turning to the Quillen equivalence we need the following proposition.
The most elegant way to prove this proposition is to follow the development of Section 3 for spectra. Theorem 3.1.11 becomes stronger in this situation; we find that stable equivalences coincide with stable homotopy isomorphisms. The above proposition is then the analogue of Lemma 3.4.12.
We prove this theorem by using Lemma 4.1.7. In particular, we need to understand stable equivalences between stably fibrant objects.
Let $L$ denote a fibrant replacement functor in $Sp^{\Sigma }$, obtained by factoring $X\xrightarrow {}*$ into a stable trivial cofibration followed by a stable fibration. By Lemma 4.1.7 and Corollary 4.2.7, to prove Theorem 4.2.5 it suffices to show that $X \to ULVX$ is a stable equivalence for all cofibrant (non-symmetric) spectra $X$. We prove this in several steps.
Note that $\widetilde{F}_{0}X=\Sigma ^{\infty }X$. Also, since $U\circ \operatorname {Ev}_{n}=\operatorname {Ev}_{n}$, the left adjoints satisfy $V\circ \widetilde{F}_{n}=F_{n}$.
Because both $Sp^{\Sigma }$ and $Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ are stable model categories, the following lemma is expected.
Using the preceding three lemmas we can extend Lemma 4.2.9 to any cofibrant strictly bounded below spectrum.
We now extend this lemma to all cofibrant objects, completing the proof of Theorem 4.2.5. First, we need to recall a basic fact about simplicial sets. Recall that the homotopy group $\pi _{n}X$ of a pointed simplicial set $X$ is defined to be $\pi _{0}\operatorname {Map}_{\mathcal{S}_{*}}(S^{n},KX)$, where $K$ is a fibrant replacement functor. This ensures that weak equivalences are homotopy isomorphisms. If $X$ is already a Kan complex, $X$ is simplicially homotopy equivalent to $KX$, and so $\pi _{n}X\cong \pi _{0}\operatorname {Map}_{\mathcal{S}_{*}}(S^{n},X)$. Since the simplicial sets $\partial \Delta [n]_{+}$ and $\Delta [n]_{+}$ are finite, the colimit of a sequence of Kan complexes is again a Kan complex. Since the simplicial sets $S^{n}$ and $S^{n}\wedge \Delta [1]_{+}$ are finite, homotopy commutes with filtered colimits of Kan complexes, and in particular with transfinite compositions of maps of Kan complexes.
In fact, homotopy commutes with transfinite compositions of arbitrary monomorphisms of simplicial sets. To see this, apply the geometric realization to get a sequence of cofibrations of CW complexes. Since homotopy commutes with such transfinite compositions, the result follows.
4.3. Description of $V$
This short section is devoted to the construction of the left adjoint $V\colon \,Sp^{\mathbb{N}}\xrightarrow {}Sp^{\Sigma }$ to the forgetful functor $U\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\xrightarrow {}Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$.
Recall that, in any cocomplete symmetric monoidal category $\mathcal{C}$, the free monoid or tensor algebra generated by an object $X$ is $T(X)= e \vee X \vee X^{\otimes 2} \vee \cdots \vee X^{\otimes n} \vee \cdots$, where $e$ is the unit and $\vee$ is the coproduct. The multiplication on $T(X)$ is the concatenation $X^{\otimes n} \otimes X^{\otimes m} \to X^{\otimes (n+m)}$. Similarly, the free commutative monoid on an object $X$ is $\operatorname {Sym}(X)= e \vee X \vee (X^{\otimes 2}/ \Sigma _2) \vee \cdots \vee (X^{\otimes n}/\Sigma _n) \vee \cdots$.
Recall that the evaluation functor $\operatorname {Ev}_{n}\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }\xrightarrow {}\mathcal{S}_{*}$ has a left adjoint $G_{n}$, where $G_{n}X$ is $(\Sigma _{n})_{+}\wedge X$ at level $n$ and the basepoint everywhere else. Similarly, the evaluation functor $\operatorname {Ev}_{n}\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\mathbb{N}}\xrightarrow {}\mathcal{S}_{*}$ has a left adjoint $\widetilde{G}_{n}$, where $\widetilde{G}_{n}$ is $X$ at level $n$ and the basepoint everywhere else.
This lemma explains why left $S$-modules and right $S$-modules are equivalent in the category of sequences, since this is true for any tensor algebra. This lemma also explains why Remark 1.2.3 holds, since an analogous statement holds for any free commutative monoid.
Now, the forgetful functor $U\colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }\xrightarrow {}\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\mathbb{N}}$ has a left adjoint $G$, defined by $GX=\bigvee G_{n}X_{n}$, so that the $n$th level of $GX$ is just $(\Sigma _{n})_{+}\wedge X_{n}$. The functor $G$ is monoidal; that is, there is a natural isomorphism $G(X)\otimes G(Y)\xrightarrow {}G(X\otimes Y)$ compatible with the associativity and unit isomorphisms. However, $G$ is definitely not a symmetric monoidal functor; this natural isomorphism is not compatible with the commutativity isomorphisms. This explains how $S$ can be commutative in $\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\Sigma }$ yet $US=S$ is not commutative in $\mathcal{S}_{*}^{\mathbb{N}}$.
Since $G$ is a monoidal functor, $G$ preserves monoids and modules, and so defines a functor $G\colon \,Sp^{\mathbb{N}}\xrightarrow {}T(G_{1}S^{1})$-mod, left adjoint to the forgetful functor $T(G_{1}S^{1})\text{-mod}\xrightarrow {}Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$. On the other hand, the map of monoids $T(G_{1}S^{1})\xrightarrow {p}\operatorname {Sym}(G_{1}S^{1})=S$ defines the usual adjoint pair of induction and restriction. Induction takes a (left) $T(G_{1}S^{1})$-module$X$ to $S\otimes _{T(G_{1}S^{1})}X$, where the tensor product uses the right action of $T(G_{1}S^{1})$ on $S$ determined by $p$. It follows that the left adjoint $V\colon \,Sp^{\mathbb{N}}\xrightarrow {}Sp^{\Sigma }$ of the forgetful functor $U\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\xrightarrow {}Sp^{\mathbb{N}}$ is $V(X)=S\otimes _{T(G_{1}S^{1})} GX$.
5. Additional properties of symmetric spectra
In this section we discuss some properties of the category of symmetric spectra. In Section 5.1, we consider the level model structures on $Sp^{\Sigma }$. In particular, we show that every symmetric spectrum embeds in an injective spectrum by a level equivalence, completing the proof that the stable structures define a model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$. In Section 5.2 we characterize the stable cofibrations. In Sections 5.3 and 5.4, we study the relationship between the stable model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ and the smash product. This is necessary for constructing model categories of monoids, algebras, and modules, as is done in Reference SS97. In Section 5.5, we show that the stable model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ is proper. Finally, in Section 5.6 we define semistable spectra and investigate their relationship to stable homotopy equivalences.
5.1. Level model structure
In this section we construct the two level model structures on the category of symmetric spectra.
Some parts of the next lemma have already been proved. They are repeated for easy reference. Recall that $R_n \colon \,\mathcal{S}_{*}\to Sp^{\Sigma }$ is the right adjoint of the evaluation functor $\operatorname {Ev}_n\colon \,Sp^{\Sigma }\to \mathcal{S}_{*}$.
The following lemmas are used in the proof of Lemma 5.1.4.
It follows in similar fashion that the smallest subspectrum of a spectrum $X$ containing any countable collection of simplices of $X$ is countable.
We need a similar lemma for inclusions which are level equivalences. To prove such a lemma, we need to recall from the comments before Lemma 4.2.14 that homotopy of simplicial sets commutes with transfinite compositions of monomorphisms. The same methods imply that relative homotopy commutes with transfinite compositions of monomorphisms.
5.2. Stable cofibrations
The object of this section is to give a characterization of stable cofibrations in $Sp^{\Sigma }$. To this end, we introduce the latching space.
There is a map of symmetric spectra $i\colon \,\overline{S}\to S$ which is the identity on positive levels. This induces a natural transformation $L_{n}X\to X_{n}$ of pointed $\Sigma _{n}$ simplicial sets.
The following proposition uses a model structure on the category of pointed $\Sigma _{n}$ simplicial sets. A map $f\colon \,X\to Y$ of pointed $\Sigma _{n}$ simplicial sets is a $\Sigma _{n}$-fibration if it is a Kan fibration of the underlying simplicial sets. Similarly, $f$ is a weak equivalence if it is a weak equivalence of the underlying simplicial sets. The map $f$ is a $\Sigma _{n}$-cofibration if it is a monomorphism such that $\Sigma _{n}$ acts freely on the simplices of $Y$ not in the image of $f$. It is well-known, and easy to check, that the $\Sigma _{n}$-cofibrations, the $\Sigma _{n}$-fibrations, and the weak equivalences define a model structure on the category of pointed $\Sigma _{n}$-simplicial sets.
5.3. Pushout smash product
In this section we consider the pushout smash product in an arbitrary symmetric monoidal category and apply our results to $Sp^{\Sigma }$. We show that the projective level structure and the stable model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ are both compatible with the symmetric monoidal structure. A monoid $E$ in $Sp^{\Sigma }$ is called a symmetric ring spectrum, and is similar to an $A_{\infty }$-ring spectrum. Thus, there should be a stable model structure on the category of $E$-modules. Similarly, there should be a model structure on the category of symmetric ring spectra and the category of commutative symmetric ring spectra. These issues are dealt with more fully in Reference SS97 and in work in progress of the third author. Their work depends heavily on the results in this section and in Section 5.4. The results of this section alone suffice to construct a stable model structure on the category of modules over a symmetric ring spectrum which is stably cofibrant. This section also contains brief descriptions of two other stable model structures on $Sp^{\Sigma }$.
In our situation, this is the correct condition to require so that the model structure is compatible with the symmetric monoidal structure. Since the unit, $S$, is cofibrant in symmetric spectra this condition also ensures that the symmetric monoidal structure induces a symmetric monoidal structure on the homotopy category. For a more general discussion of monoidal model structures, see Reference Hov98a.
Recall, from Definition 3.3.6, the map of sets $\mathcal{C}_{\square }(f,g)$.
We now examine to what extent the pushout smash product preserves stable cofibrations and stable equivalences. To do so, we introduce a new class of maps in $Sp^{\Sigma }$.
Note that every stable cofibration is an $S$-cofibration, since $FI_{\partial }= S\otimes \bigcup _{n}G_{n}I_{\partial }$. On the other hand, by Proposition 2.1.9, every element of $S\otimes M$ is a monomorphism, and so every $S$-cofibration is a level cofibration. There is a model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$, called the $S$ model structure, where the cofibrations are the $S$-cofibrations and the weak equivalences are the stable equivalences. The fibrations, called $S$-fibrations are those maps with the right lifting property with respect to $S$-cofibrations which are also stable equivalences. Every $S$-fibration is a stable fibration. This model structure will be used in a forthcoming paper by the third author to put a model structure on certain commutative $S$-algebras.
We mention as well that there is a third model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ where the weak equivalences are the stable equivalences, called the injective (stable) model structure. The injective cofibrations are the level cofibrations and the injective stable fibrations are all maps which are both injective fibrations and stable fibrations. In particular, the fibrant objects are the injective $\Omega$-spectra. The interested reader can prove this is a model structure using the methods of Section 3.4, replacing the set $I$ with the union of $I$ and the countable level cofibrations.
It also follows that the $S$ model structure on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ is monoidal, once it is proven to be a model structure. Neither the injective level structure nor the injective stable structure is monoidal.
Adjunction then gives the following corollary.
5.4. The monoid axiom
In Reference SS97, techniques are developed to form model category structures for categories of monoids, algebras, and modules over a monoidal model category. One more axiom is required which is referred to as the monoid axiom. In this section we verify the monoid axiom for symmetric spectra. The results of Reference SS97 then immediately give a model structure on symmetric ring spectra. After proving the monoid axiom, we discuss the homotopy invariance of the resulting model categories of modules and algebras.
Let $K$ denote the class in $Sp^{\Sigma }$ consisting of all maps $f\wedge X$, where $f$ is a stable trivial cofibration and $X$ is some symmetric spectrum. The following theorem implies the monoid axiom for symmetric spectra.
Taking $R=S$ gives a model structure on the category of monoids of symmetric spectra, the symmetric ring spectra.
We now show that the model categories of modules and algebras are homotopy invariant.
Since $S$, the sphere spectrum, is cofibrant in $Sp^{\Sigma }$, Theorems 3.3 and 3.4 of Reference SS97 now apply to give the following theorem.
5.5. Proper model categories
In this section we recall the definition of a proper model category and show that the stable model category of symmetric spectra is proper.
The category of simplicial sets is a proper model category Reference BF78 (see Reference Hir99 for more details). Hence the category of pointed simplicial sets and both level model structures on $Sp^{\Sigma }$ are proper.
5.6. Semistable spectra
In this section we consider a subcategory of symmetric spectra called the semistable spectra. This subcategory sheds light on the difference between stable equivalences and stable homotopy equivalences of symmetric spectra. As in Section 1.4, the stable homotopy category is equivalent to the homotopy category of semistable spectra obtained by inverting the stable homotopy equivalences. Semistable spectra also play a role in Reference Shi.
Because stable equivalences are not always stable homotopy equivalences, the stable homotopy groups are not algebraic invariants of stable homotopy types. So the stable homotopy groups of a spectrum may not be “correct”. For any symmetric spectrum $X$, though, if there is a map from $X$ to an $\Omega$-spectrum which induces an isomorphism in stable homotopy, then the stable homotopy groups of $X$ are the “correct” stable homotopy groups. In other words, these groups are isomorphic to the stable homotopy groups of the stable fibrant replacement of $X$. Spectra with this property are called semistable.
Let $L$ denote a fibrant replacement functor in $Sp^{\Sigma }$, obtained by factoring $X \to *$ into a stable trivial cofibration followed by a stable fibration, as in Section 4.2.
Of course $X \xrightarrow {} LX$ is always a stable equivalence, but not all spectra are semistable. For instance, $F_1S^1$ is not semistable. Certainly any stably fibrant spectrum, i.e., an $\Omega$-spectrum, is semistable. In Section 3.1 we defined the functor $R^{\infty }$ and noted that, although it is similar to the standard $\Omega$-spectrum construction for (non-symmetric) spectra, it is not always an $\Omega$-spectrum and $X \xrightarrow {} R^{\infty }X$ is not always a stable homotopy equivalence, even if $X$ is level fibrant. Let $K$ be a level fibrant replacement functor, the prolongation of a fibrant replacement functor for simplicial sets. The following proposition shows that on semistable spectra $R^{\infty } K$ does have these expected properties.
Before proving this proposition we need the following lemma.
Two classes of semistable spectra are described in the following proposition. The second class includes the connective and convergent spectra.
The next proposition shows that stable equivalences between semistable spectra are particularly easy to understand.
Construction 3.1.7 (Mapping cylinder construction).
Corollary 3.1.8.
Example 3.1.10.
Theorem 3.1.11.
Theorem 3.1.14.
Proposition 3.2.4 (The Retract Argument).
Proposition 3.2.5 (Closure property).
Example 3.2.6.
Proposition 3.2.8.
Lemma 3.2.10.
Lemma 3.2.11 (Factorization Lemma).
Definition 3.3.2.
Proposition 3.3.3.
Proposition 3.3.5.
Definition 3.3.6.
Proposition 3.3.8.
Corollary 3.3.9.
Proposition 3.4.2.
Theorem 3.4.4.
Lemma 3.4.5.
Corollary 3.4.6.
Corollary 3.4.7.
Lemma 3.4.8.
Definition 3.4.9.
Lemma 3.4.12.
Corollary 3.4.13.
Lemma 3.4.15.
Corollary 3.4.16.
Lemma 4.1.3 (Ken Brown’s Lemma).
Lemma 4.1.7.
Proposition 4.2.3.
Proposition 4.2.4.
Theorem 4.2.5.
Lemma 4.2.6.
Corollary 4.2.7.
Lemma 4.2.9.
Lemma 4.2.10.
Lemma 4.2.11.
Lemma 4.2.14.
Lemma 4.2.15.
Corollary 5.1.3.
Lemma 5.1.4.
Lemma 5.1.6.
Lemma 5.1.7.
Proposition 5.3.4.
Corollary 5.3.5.
Theorem 5.3.7.
Corollary 5.3.9.
Corollary 5.3.10.
Theorem 5.4.1.
Lemma 5.5.3.
Proposition 5.6.2.
Lemma 5.6.3.
References
Reference [Ada74]
J. F. Adams, Stable homotopy and generalised homology, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.–London, 1974, x+373 pp. MR 53:6534
Reference [Bök85]
M. Bökstedt, Topological Hochschild homology, preprint, 1985.
Reference [Bor94]
Francis Borceux, Handbook of categorical algebra. 2. Categories and structures, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 51, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. MR 96g:18001b
Reference [BF78]
A. K. Bousfield and E. M. Friedlander, Homotopy theory of $\Gamma$-spaces, spectra, and bisimplicial sets, Geometric applications of homotopy theory (Proc. Conf., Evanston, Ill., 1977), II (M. G. Barratt and M. E. Mahowald, eds.), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 658, Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp. 80–130. MR 80e:55021
Reference [Cur71]
Edward B. Curtis, Simplicial homotopy theory, Advances in Math. 6 (1971), 107–209. MR 43:5529
Reference [DHK]
W. G. Dwyer, P. S. Hirschhorn, and D. M. Kan, Model categories and general abstract homotopy theory, in preparation.
Reference [DS]
W. G. Dwyer and Brooke E. Shipley, Hyper symmetric spectra, in preparation.
Reference [DS95]
W. G. Dwyer and J. Spalinski, Homotopy theories and model categories, Handbook of algebraic topology (Amsterdam), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1995, pp. 73–126. MR 96h:55014
Reference [EKMM97]
A. D. Elmendorf, I. Kriz, M. A. Mandell, and J. P. May, Rings, modules, and algebras in stable homotopy theory. With an appendix by M. Cole, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 47, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1997, xii+249 pp. MR 97h:55006
Reference [GH97]
Thomas Geisser and Lars Hesselholt, Topological cyclic homology of schemes, to appear in K-theory, Seattle, 1996 volume of Proc. Symp. Pure Math.
Reference [Hir99]
P. S. Hirschhorn, Localization of model categories, preprint, 1999.
Reference [Hov98a]
Mark Hovey, Model categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 63, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1998. MR 99h:55031
Reference [Hov98b]
Mark Hovey, Stabilization of model categories, preprint, 1998.
Reference [HPS97]
Mark Hovey, John H. Palmieri, and Neil P. Strickland, Axiomatic stable homotopy theory, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (1997), no. 610. MR 98a:55017
Reference [Lew91]
L. Gaunce Lewis, Jr., Is there a convenient category of spectra?, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 73 (1991), 233–246. MR 92f:55008
Reference [Lim59]
Elon L. Lima, The Spanier-Whitehead duality in new homotopy categories, Summa Brasil. Math. 4 (1959), 91–148. MR 22:7121
Reference [ML71]
S. Mac Lane, Categories for the working mathematician, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 5, Springer-Verlag, 1971. MR 50:7275
Reference [MMSS98a]
M. Mandell, J. P. May, B. Shipley, and S. Schwede, Diagram spaces, diagram spectra and FSPs, preprint, 1998.
Reference [MMSS98b]
M. Mandell, J. P. May, B. Shipley, and S. Schwede, Model categories of diagram spectra, preprint, 1998.
Reference [May67]
J. P. May, Simplicial objects in algebraic topology, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill., 1967, viii+161pp. MR 36:5942
Reference [Qui67]
Daniel G. Quillen, Homotopical algebra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 43, Springer-Verlag, 1967. MR 36:6480
Reference [Sch98]
Stefan Schwede, S-modules and symmetric spectra, preprint, 1998.
Reference [SS]
Stefan Schwede and Brooke Shipley, Classification of stable model categories, in preparation.
Reference [SS97]
Stefan Schwede and Brooke Shipley, Algebras and modules in monoidal model categories, to appear in Proc. London Math. Soc.
Reference [Shi]
B. Shipley, Symmetric spectra and topological Hochschild homology, to appear in K-theory.
Reference [Voe97]
V. Voevodsky, The Milnor conjecture, preprint, 1997.
Note. To explore an equation, focus it (e.g., by clicking on it) and use the arrow keys to navigate its structure. Screenreader users should be advised that enabling speech synthesis will lead to duplicate aural rendering.