Skip to Main Content

Mathematics of Computation

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1960 (published as Mathematical Tables and other Aids to Computation 1943-1959), Mathematics of Computation is devoted to research articles of the highest quality in computational mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6842 (online) ISSN 0025-5718 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Mathematics of Computation is 1.78.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Multiplicative congruential random number generators with modulus $2^ \beta$: an exhaustive analysis for $\beta =32$ and a partial analysis for $\beta =48$
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by George S. Fishman PDF
Math. Comp. 54 (1990), 331-344 Request permission

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of a search to find optimal maximal period multipliers for multiplicative congruential random number generators with moduli ${2^{32}}$ and ${2^{48}}$. Here a multiplier is said to be optimal if the distance between adjacent parallel hyperplanes on which k-tuples lie does not exceed the minimal achievable distance by more than 25 percent for $k = 2, \ldots ,6$. This criterion is considerably more stringent than prevailing standards of acceptability and leads to a total of only 132 multipliers out of the more than 536 million candidate multipliers that exist for modulus ${2^{32}}$ and to only 42 multipliers in a sample of about 67.1 million tested among the more than $351 \times {10^{11}}$ candidate multipliers for modulus ${2^{48}}$. Section 1 reviews the basic properties of multiplicative congruential generators and $\S 2$ describes worst case performance measures. These include the maximal distance between adjacent parallel hyperplanes, the minimal number of parallel hyperplanes, the minimal distance between k-tuples and the discrepancy. For modulus ${2^{32}}$, $\S 3$ presents the ten best multipliers and compares their performances with those of two multipliers that have been recommended in the literature. Comparisons using packing measures in the space of k-tuples and in the dual space are also made. For modulus ${2^{48}}$, $\S 4$ also presents analogous results for the five best multipliers and for two multipliers suggested in the literature.
References
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation with MSC: 65C10, 11K45
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC: 65C10, 11K45
Additional Information
  • © Copyright 1990 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Math. Comp. 54 (1990), 331-344
  • MSC: Primary 65C10; Secondary 11K45
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-0993929-9
  • MathSciNet review: 993929