Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS
|
   
Available in electronic format
Available in print format
Mathematics of Computation
Mathematics of Computation
ISSN 1088-6842(e) ISSN 0025-5718(p)

     

Nitsche's method for general boundary conditions

Author(s): Mika Juntunen; Rolf Stenberg.
Journal: Math. Comp. 78 (2009), 1353-1374.
MSC (2000): Primary 65N30
Posted: September 25, 2008
MathSciNet review: 2501054
Retrieve article in: PDF

Abstract | References | Similar articles | Additional information

Abstract: We introduce a method for treating general boundary conditions in the finite element method generalizing an approach, due to Nitsche (1971), for approximating Dirichlet boundary conditions. We use Poisson's equations as a model problem and prove a priori and a posteriori error estimates. The method is also compared with the traditional Galerkin method. The theoretical results are verified numerically.


References:

1.
Douglas N. Arnold, Franco Brezzi, Bernardo Cockburn, and L. Donatella Marini, Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39 (2001/02), no. 5, 1749-1779 (electronic). MR 1885715 (2002k:65183)

2.
Ivo Babuška, Uday Banerjee, and John E. Osborn, Survey of meshless and generalized finite element methods: a unified approach, Acta Numer. 12 (2003), 1-125. MR 2249154

3.
Roland Becker, Peter Hansbo, and Rolf Stenberg, A finite element methods for domain decomposition with non-matching grids, Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 37 (2003), no. 2, 209-225. MR 1991197 (2004e:65129)

4.
D. Braess and R. Verfürth, A posteriori error estimator for the Raviart-Thomas element, SIAM J. Numer. Anal 33 (1996), 2431-2444. MR 1427472 (97m:65201)

5.
Philippe G. Ciarlet, The finite element methods for elliptic problems, second ed., North-Holland, 1987. MR 0520174 (58:25001)

6.
J.A. Nitsche, Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Verwendung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind, Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg 36 (1970/71), 9-15. MR 0341903 (49:6649)

7.
Rolf Stenberg, Mortaring by a method of J.A. Nitsche, Computational Mechanics; New Trends and Applications, S. Idelsohn, E. Oñate and E. Dvorkin (Eds.) (CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, 1998). MR 1839048

8.
Rüdiger Verfürth, A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement techniques, Wiley, 1996.


Similar Articles:

Retrieve articles in Mathematics of Computation with MSC (2000): 65N30

Retrieve articles in all Journals with MSC (2000): 65N30


Additional Information:

Mika Juntunen
Affiliation: Institute of Mathematics, Helsinki University of Technology, P. O. Box 1100, 02015 TKK, Finland
Email: mika.juntunen@tkk.fi

Rolf Stenberg
Affiliation: Institute of Mathematics, Helsinki University of Technology, P. O. Box 1100, 02015 TKK, Finland

DOI: 10.1090/S0025-5718-08-02183-2
PII: S 0025-5718(08)02183-2
Received by editor(s): October 17, 2007,
Received by editor(s) in revised form: May 21, 2008
Posted: September 25, 2008
Additional Notes: This work was supported by the Finnish National Graduate School in Engineering Mechanics, by the Academy of Finland, and TEKES, the National Technology Agency of Finland.
Copyright of article: Copyright 2008, American Mathematical Society




AMS and Social Media LinkedIn Facebook Podcasts Twitter YouTube RSS Feeds Blogs Wikipedia