𝑄-sets do not necessarily have strong measure zero

$Q$-sets do not necessarily have strong measure zero
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Jaime Ihoda and Saharon Shelah PDF

Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 102 (1988), 681-683 Request permission

The purpose of this paper is to give a negative answer to the following question (see Miller [4]): Do all $Q$-sets have strong measure zero?

References

James E. Baumgartner, Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 87, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983, pp. 1–59. MR 823775, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511758867.002
W. G. Fleissner, Current research on $Q$ sets, Topology, Vol. I (Proc. Fourth Colloq., Budapest, 1978) Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai, vol. 23, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1980, pp. 413–431. MR 588793
William G. Fleissner and Arnold W. Miller, On $Q$ sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 78 (1980), no. 2, 280–284. MR 550513, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9939-1980-0550513-4
Arnold W. Miller, Special subsets of the real line, Handbook of set-theoretic topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 201–233. MR 776624
A. R. D. Mathias, Happy families, Ann. Math. Logic 12 (1977), no. 1, 59–111. MR 491197, DOI 10.1016/0003-4843(77)90006-7
Fritz Rothberger, On some problems of Hausdorff and of Sierpiński, Fund. Math. 35 (1948), 29–46. MR 29958, DOI 10.4064/fm-35-1-29-46