The range of a vector measure determines its total variation
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Luis Rodríguez-Piazza PDF
- Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 111 (1991), 205-214 Request permission
Abstract:
We prove that if the ranges of two finitely additive measures with values in a normed space have the same closed convex hull, then the measures have the same total variation. We also study the monotonicity of this variation with respect to the range, proving that a normed space $X$ is $C$-isomorphic to a subspace of an ${L^1}$ space if and only if, for every pair $\mu ,\nu$ of $X$-valued measures such that the range of $\mu$ lies inside the closed convex hull of the range of $\nu$, the total variation of $\mu$ is less than or equal to $C$ times the total variation of $\nu$. This allows us to answer two questions raised by R. Anantharaman and J. Diestel.References
- R. Anantharaman and J. Diestel, Sequences in the range of a vector measure, Comment. Math. Prace Mat. 30 (1991), no. 2, 221–235. MR 1122692
- Ethan D. Bolker, A class of convex bodies, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (1969), 323–345. MR 256265, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-1969-0256265-X
- K. P. S. Bhaskara Rao and M. Bhaskara Rao, Theory of charges, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 109, Academic Press, Inc. [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers], New York, 1983. A study of finitely additive measures; With a foreword by D. M. Stone. MR 751777 G. Choquet, Lectures on analysis, vol. 3, Benjamin, New York, 1969.
- J. Diestel and J. J. Uhl Jr., Vector measures, Mathematical Surveys, No. 15, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1977. With a foreword by B. J. Pettis. MR 0453964, DOI 10.1090/surv/015
- J. Lindenstrauss and A. Pełczyński, Absolutely summing operators in $L_{p}$-spaces and their applications, Studia Math. 29 (1968), 275–326. MR 231188, DOI 10.4064/sm-29-3-275-326
Additional Information
- © Copyright 1991 American Mathematical Society
- Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 111 (1991), 205-214
- MSC: Primary 46G10; Secondary 28B05
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-1991-1025281-X
- MathSciNet review: 1025281