|
Small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals
Author(s):
Joel
David
Hamkins;
W.
Hugh
Woodin
Journal:
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
128
(2000),
3025-3029.
MSC (1991):
Primary 03E55, 03E40
Posted:
April 28, 2000
MathSciNet review:
1664390
Retrieve article in:
PDF
This article is available free of charge
Abstract |
References |
Similar articles |
Additional information
Abstract:
After small forcing, almost every strongness embedding is the lift of a strongness embedding in the ground model. Consequently, small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals.
References:
-
- [LevSol67]
- Azriel Levy, Robert M. Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the Continuum Hypothesis, IJM 5 (1967), 234-248. MR 37:57
Similar Articles:
Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical
Society
with
MSC (1991):
03E55, 03E40
Retrieve articles in all Journals with
MSC (1991):
03E55, 03E40
Additional Information:
Joel
David
Hamkins
Affiliation:
Mathematics Program, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10016
Email:
jhamkins@gc.cuny.edu
W.
Hugh
Woodin
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Email:
woodin@math.berkeley.edu
DOI:
10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05347-8
PII:
S 0002-9939(00)05347-8
Keywords:
Small forcing,
large cardinals,
strong cardinal,
Woodin cardinal.
Received by editor(s):
September 1, 1998
Received by editor(s) in revised form:
November 9, 1998
Posted:
April 28, 2000
Additional Notes:
The research of the first author has been supported in part by grants from the PSC-CUNY Research Foundation, and of the second author, by grants from the NSF
Communicated by:
Carl G. Jockusch, Jr.
Copyright of article:
Copyright
2000,
American Mathematical Society
|