Remote Access Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
Green Open Access

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

ISSN 1088-6826(online) ISSN 0002-9939(print)

 

 

On a converse to Banach's Fixed Point Theorem


Author: Márton Elekes
Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 3139-3146
MSC (2000): Primary 54H25, 47H10, 55M20, 03E15, 54H05; Secondary 26A16
Published electronically: April 30, 2009
MathSciNet review: 2506473
Full-text PDF Free Access

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: We say that a metric space $ (X,d)$ possesses the Banach Fixed Point Property (BFPP) if every contraction $ f:X\to X$ has a fixed point. The Banach Fixed Point Theorem states that every complete metric space has the BFPP. However, E. Behrends pointed out in 2006 that the converse implication does not hold; that is, the BFPP does not imply completeness; in particular, there is a nonclosed subset of $ \mathbb{R}^2$ possessing the BFPP. He also asked if there is even an open example in $ \mathbb{R}^n$, and whether there is a `nice' example in $ \mathbb{R}$. In this note we answer the first question in the negative, the second one in the affirmative, and determine the simplest such examples in the sense of descriptive set theoretic complexity.

Specifically, first we prove that if $ X\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ is open or $ X\subset\mathbb{R}$ is simultaneously $ F_\sigma$ and $ G_\delta$ and $ X$ has the BFPP, then $ X$ is closed. Then we show that these results are optimal, as we give an $ F_\sigma $ and also a $ G_\delta$ nonclosed example in $ \mathbb{R}$ with the BFPP.

We also show that a nonmeasurable set can have the BFPP. Our non-$ G_\delta$ examples provide metric spaces with the BFPP that cannot be remetrized by any compatible complete metric. All examples are in addition bounded.


References [Enhancements On Off] (What's this?)

  • 1. A. C. Babu, A converse to a generalized Banach contraction principle, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.) 32(46) (1982), 5–6. MR 710962
  • 2. E. Behrends, Problem Session of the 34th Winter School in Abstract Analysis, 2006.
  • 3. E. Behrends, private communication, 2006.
  • 4. C. Bessaga, On the converse of the Banach “fixed-point principle“, Colloq. Math. 7 (1959), 41–43. MR 0111015
  • 5. Ljubomir B. Ćirić, On some mappings in metric spaces and fixed points, Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci. (6) 6 (1995), no. 1-6, 81–89. MR 1385507
  • 6. Herbert Federer, Geometric measure theory, Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 153, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, 1969. MR 0257325
  • 7. A. A. Ivanov, Fixed points of mappings of metric spaces, Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 66 (1976), 5–102, 207 (Russian, with English summary). Studies in topology, II. MR 0467711
  • 8. Jacek Jachymski, General solutions of two functional inequalities and converses to contraction theorems, Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Math. 51 (2003), no. 2, 147–156. MR 1990804
  • 9. Ludvík Janoš, A converse of Banach’s contraction theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (1967), 287–289. MR 0208589, 10.1090/S0002-9939-1967-0208589-3
  • 10. Ludvík Janoš, A converse of the generalized Banach’s contraction theorem, Arch. Math. (Basel) 21 (1970), 69–71. MR 0264628
  • 11. Alexander S. Kechris, Classical descriptive set theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 156, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. MR 1321597
  • 12. W. A. Kirk, Contraction mappings and extensions, Handbook of metric fixed point theory, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 2001, pp. 1–34. MR 1904272
  • 13. K. Kuratowski, Topology. Vol. I, New edition, revised and augmented. Translated from the French by J. Jaworowski, Academic Press, New York-London; Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, 1966. MR 0217751
  • 14. Philip R. Meyers, A converse to Banach’s contraction theorem, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards Sect. B 71B (1967), 73–76. MR 0221469
  • 15. A. Mukherjea and K. Pothoven, Real and functional analysis, Plenum Press, New York-London, 1978. Mathematical Concepts and Methods in Science and Engineering, Vol. 6. MR 0492145
  • 16. V. I. Opoĭcev, A converse of the contraction mapping principle, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 31 (1976), no. 4 (190), 169–198 (Russian). MR 0420591
  • 17. John C. Oxtoby, Measure and category, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1980. A survey of the analogies between topological and measure spaces. MR 584443
  • 18. Ioan A. Rus, Generalized contractions and applications, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2001. MR 1947742

Similar Articles

Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2000): 54H25, 47H10, 55M20, 03E15, 54H05, 26A16

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2000): 54H25, 47H10, 55M20, 03E15, 54H05, 26A16


Additional Information

Márton Elekes
Affiliation: Rényi Alfréd Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 127, H-1364 Budapest, Hungary – and – Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Email: emarci@renyi.hu

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-09-09904-3
Received by editor(s): February 2, 2007
Received by editor(s) in revised form: March 26, 2007
Published electronically: April 30, 2009
Additional Notes: The author was partially supported by Hungarian Scientific Foundation grants no. 43620, 49786, 61600, 72655, and the János Bolyai Fellowship.
Communicated by: Andreas Seeger
Article copyright: © Copyright 2009 American Mathematical Society
The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.