Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Nash equilibria in quantum games
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Steven E. Landsburg
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 4423-4434
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-10838-4
Published electronically: April 19, 2011

Abstract:

For any two-by-two game $\mathbf {G}$, we define a new two-player game $\mathbf {G}^Q$. The definition is motivated by a vision of players in game $\mathbf {G}$ communicating via quantum technology according to the protocol introduced by J. Eisert and M. Wilkins.

In the game $\mathbf {G}^Q$, each player’s (mixed) strategy set consists of the set of all probability distributions on the 3-sphere $\mathbf {S}^3$. Nash equilibria in the game can be difficult to compute.

Our main theorems classify all possible mixed-strategy equilibria. First, we show that up to a suitable definition of equivalence, any strategy that arises in equilibrium is supported on at most four points; then we show that those four points must lie in one of a small number of allowable geometric configurations.

References
  • R. Cleve, P. Hoyer, B. Toner and J. Watrous, “Consequences and Limits of Nonlocal Strategies”, Proc. of the 19th Annual Conference on Computational Complexity (2004), 236-249.
  • G. Dahl and S. Landsburg, “Quantum Strategies”, preprint, available at http://www. landsburg.com/dahlcurrent.pdf.
  • Jens Eisert and Martin Wilkens, Quantum games, J. Modern Opt. 47 (2000), no. 14-15, 2543–2556. Seminar on Fundamentals of Quantum Optics, V (Kühtai, 2000). MR 1801549, DOI 10.1080/095003400750039537
  • Jens Eisert, Martin Wilkens, and Maciej Lewenstein, Quantum games and quantum strategies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999), no. 15, 3077–3080. MR 1720182, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3077
  • S. Landsburg, “Intertwining”, working paper available at http://www.landsburg.com/ twining4.pdf.
  • S. Landsburg, “Nash Equilibrium in Quantum Games”, RCER Working Paper #524, Rochester Center for Economic Research, February 2006.
Similar Articles
  • Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2010): 91A05, 81P45
  • Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 91A05, 81P45
Bibliographic Information
  • Steven E. Landsburg
  • Affiliation: Department of Economics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627
  • Received by editor(s): October 24, 2009
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: October 17, 2010
  • Published electronically: April 19, 2011
  • Communicated by: Richard C. Bradley
  • © Copyright 2011 Steven E. Landsburg
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 139 (2011), 4423-4434
  • MSC (2010): Primary 91A05, 81P45
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-10838-4
  • MathSciNet review: 2823088