Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS

   
Remote Access
Green Open Access
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
ISSN 1088-6826(online) ISSN 0002-9939(print)

   

 

On a result of Brezis and Mawhin


Authors: R. Manásevich and J. R. Ward
Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 531-539
MSC (2010): Primary 34C25, 49J40, 58Exx
Published electronically: September 15, 2011
MathSciNet review: 2846321
Full-text PDF

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: Brezis and Mawhin proved the existence of at least one $ T$ periodic solution for differential equations of the form

$\displaystyle \notag (\phi(u^{\prime}))^{\prime}-g(t,u)=h(t)$ (0.1)

when $ \phi:(-a,a)\rightarrow \mathbb{R},$ $ 0<a<\infty$, is an increasing homeomorphism with $ \phi(0)=0$, $ g$ is a Carathéodory function $ T$ periodic with respect to $ t$, $ 2\pi$ periodic with respect to $ u$, of mean value zero with respect to $ u$, and $ h\in L_{loc}^{1}(\mathbb{R})$ is $ T$ periodic and has mean value zero. Their proof was partly variational. First it was shown that the corresponding action integral had a minimum at some point $ u_{0}$ in a closed convex subset $ \mathcal{K}$ of the space of $ T$ periodic Lipschitz functions. However, $ u_{0}$ may not be an interior point of $ \mathcal{K}$, so it may not be a critical point of the action integral. The authors used an ingenious argument based on variational inequalities and uniqueness of a $ T$ periodic solution to (0.1) when $ g(t,u)=u$ to show that $ u_{0}$ is indeed a $ T$ periodic solution of (0.1). Here we make full use of the variational structure of the problem to obtain Brezis and Mawhin's result.


References [Enhancements On Off] (What's this?)

  • [1] Haïm Brezis and Jean Mawhin, Periodic solutions of the forced relativistic pendulum, Differential Integral Equations 23 (2010), no. 9-10, 801–810. MR 2675583 (2011h:34084)
  • [2] Jean Mawhin and Michel Willem, Critical point theory and Hamiltonian systems, Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 74, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. MR 982267 (90e:58016)
  • [3] Paul H. Rabinowitz, Some minimax theorems and applications to nonlinear partial differential equations, Nonlinear analysis (collection of papers in honor of Erich H. Rothe), Academic Press, New York, 1978, pp. 161–177. MR 0501092 (58 #18545)
  • [4] Paul H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 65, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1986. MR 845785 (87j:58024)

Similar Articles

Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2010): 34C25, 49J40, 58Exx

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2010): 34C25, 49J40, 58Exx


Additional Information

R. Manásevich
Affiliation: Centro de Modelamiento Matemático and Departamento de Ingeniería Matemática, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 170, Correo 3, Santiago, Chile
Email: manasevi@dim.uchile.cl

J. R. Ward
Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Email: jrward@uab.edu

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-11311-X
Received by editor(s): October 17, 2010
Published electronically: September 15, 2011
Additional Notes: The first author was partially supported by Fondap and Basal-CMM grants and Milenio grant P05-004F
Communicated by: Yingfei Yi
Article copyright: © Copyright 2011 American Mathematical Society



Comments: Email Webmaster

© Copyright , American Mathematical Society
Contact Us · Sitemap · Privacy Statement

Connect with us Facebook Twitter Google+ LinkedIn Instagram RSS feeds Blogs YouTube Podcasts Wikipedia