|
The diagonal reflection principle
Author:
Sean Cox
Journal:
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 140 (2012), 2893-2902
MSC (2010):
Primary 03E05, 03E50, 03E57
Posted:
June 2, 2011
Full-text PDF
Abstract |
References |
Similar Articles |
Additional Information
Abstract: We introduce a highly simultaneous version of stationary set reflection, called the Diagonal Reflection Principle (DRP). We prove that implies DRP, and DRP in turn implies that the nonstationary ideal on condenses correctly for many structures. We also prove that MM implies a weaker version of DRP, which in turn implies that the nonstationary ideal on cof condenses correctly for many structures.
References
- [1]
James
E. Baumgartner, A new class of order types, Ann. Math. Logic
9 (1976), no. 3, 187–222. MR 0416925
(54 #4988)
- [2]
James
E. Baumgartner, Applications of the proper forcing axiom,
Handbook of set-theoretic topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984,
pp. 913–959. MR 776640
(86g:03084)
- [3]
Sean
Cox, Covering theorems for the core model, and an application to
stationary set reflection, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 161
(2009), no. 1, 66–93. MR 2567927
(2011c:03112), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2009.06.001
- [4]
Qi
Feng and Thomas
Jech, Projective stationary sets and a strong reflection
principle, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 58 (1998),
no. 2, 271–283. MR 1668171
(2000b:03166), http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0024610798006462
- [5]
Matthew Foreman, Ideals and Generic Elementary Embeddings, Handbook of Set Theory, Springer, 2010.
- [6]
Matthew
Foreman, Smoke and mirrors: combinatorial properties of small
cardinals equiconsistent with huge cardinals, Adv. Math.
222 (2009), no. 2, 565–595. MR 2538021
(2011c:03115), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2009.05.006
- [7]
M.
Foreman, M.
Magidor, and S.
Shelah, Martin’s maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular
ultrafilters. I, Ann. of Math. (2) 127 (1988),
no. 1, 1–47. MR 924672
(89f:03043), http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1971415
- [8]
Leo
Harrington and Saharon
Shelah, Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory,
Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 26 (1985), no. 2,
178–188. MR
783595 (86g:03079), http://dx.doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093870823
- [9]
John Krueger, On the weak reflection principle, to appear in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
- [10]
Paul
Larson, Separating stationary reflection principles, J.
Symbolic Logic 65 (2000), no. 1, 247–258. MR 1782117
(2001k:03094), http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586534
- [11]
Menachem
Magidor, Reflecting stationary sets, J. Symbolic Logic
47 (1982), no. 4, 755–771 (1983). MR 683153
(84f:03046), http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2273097
- [12]
W.
Hugh Woodin, The axiom of determinacy, forcing axioms, and the
nonstationary ideal, de Gruyter Series in Logic and its Applications,
vol. 1, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1999. MR 1713438
(2001e:03001)
Similar Articles
Retrieve articles in Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society
with MSC (2010):
03E05,
03E50,
03E57
Retrieve articles in all journals
with MSC (2010):
03E05,
03E50,
03E57
Additional Information
Sean Cox
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, Universität Münster, Einsteinstrasse 62, 48149 Münster, Germany
Email:
sean.cox@uni-muenster.de
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-2011-11103-1
PII:
S 0002-9939(2011)11103-1
Received by editor(s):
November 11, 2010
Received by editor(s) in revised form:
March 2, 2011
Posted:
June 2, 2011
Additional Notes:
I thank Matt Foreman, Ralf Schindler, and Martin Zeman for helpful conversations on related topics.
Communicated by:
Julia Knight
Article copyright:
© Copyright 2011 American Mathematical Society
|