Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

Borel canonization of analytic sets with Borel sections
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Ohad Drucker PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (2018), 3073-3084 Request permission

Abstract:

Kanovei, Sabok and Zapletal asked whether every proper $\sigma$-ideal satisfies the following property: given $E$ an analytic equivalence relation with Borel classes, there exists a set $B$ which is Borel and $I$-positive such that $E\restriction _{B}$ is Borel. We propose a related problem – does every proper $\sigma$-ideal satisfy: given $A$ an analytic subset of the plane with Borel sections, there exists a set $B$ which is Borel and $I$-positive such that $A\cap (B\times \omega ^{\omega })$ is Borel. We answer positively when a measurable cardinal exists, and negatively in $L$, where no proper $\sigma$ ideal has that property. We show that a positive answer for all ccc $\sigma$-ideals implies that $\omega _{1}$ is inaccessible to the reals and Mahlo in $L$.
References
  • Joan Bagaria and Sy D. Friedman, Generic absoluteness, Proceedings of the XIth Latin American Symposium on Mathematical Logic (Mérida, 1998), 2001, pp. 3–13. MR 1819046, DOI 10.1016/S0168-0072(00)00038-5
  • Jörg Brendle and Benedikt Löwe, Solovay-type characterizations for forcing-algebras, J. Symbolic Logic 64 (1999), no. 3, 1307–1323. MR 1779764, DOI 10.2307/2586632
  • W. Chan, Equivalence Relations Which Are Borel Somewhere, http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1511.07981v2, 2015.
  • O. Drucker, Hjorth Analysis of General Polish Group Actions, http://arxiv.org/pdf/ 1512.06369v1.pdf, 2015.
  • Hirosh Fujita, Coanalytic sets with Borel sections, Axiomatic set theory (Japanese), 1686 (2010), 59-62.
  • Su Gao, Invariant descriptive set theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics (Boca Raton), vol. 293, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009. MR 2455198
  • G. Hjorth, Variations on Scott, Preliminary report, www.math.ucla.edu/ ~greg/variations.ps, 1998.
  • G. Hjorth, The fine structure and Borel complexity of orbits, http:// www.math.ucla.edu/~greg/fineorbits.pdf, 2010.
  • Daisuke Ikegami, Forcing absoluteness and regularity properties, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 161 (2010), no. 7, 879–894. MR 2601017, DOI 10.1016/j.apal.2009.10.005
  • Daisuke Ikegami, Borel approximation of coanalytic sets with Borel sections and the regularity properties for $\mathbf {\Sigma }_{2}^{1}$ sets of reals, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, 1754 (2011), 21-31.
  • Akihiro Kanamori, The higher infinite, 2nd ed., Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009. Large cardinals in set theory from their beginnings; Paperback reprint of the 2003 edition. MR 2731169
  • Vladimir Kanovei, Marcin Sabok, and Jindřich Zapletal, Canonical Ramsey theory on Polish spaces, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 202, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. MR 3135065, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139208666
  • Dana Scott, Logic with denumerably long formulas and finite strings of quantifiers, Theory of Models (Proc. 1963 Internat. Sympos. Berkeley), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 329–341. MR 0200133
  • A. Lévy and R. M. Solovay, Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, Israel J. Math. 5 (1967), 234–248. MR 224458, DOI 10.1007/BF02771612
  • Jacques Stern, On Lusin’s restricted continuum problem, Ann. of Math. (2) 120 (1984), no. 1, 7–37. MR 750715, DOI 10.2307/2007070
  • Jindřich Zapletal, Forcing idealized, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 174, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008. MR 2391923, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511542732
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Ohad Drucker
  • Affiliation: Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram. Jerusalem, 9190401, Israel
  • Received by editor(s): January 4, 2017
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: May 7, 2017, and May 31, 2017
  • Published electronically: March 30, 2018
  • Additional Notes: This paper is part of the author’s PhD thesis written at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem under the supervision of Professor Menachem Magidor.
  • Communicated by: Mirna Džamonja
  • © Copyright 2018 American Mathematical Society
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 146 (2018), 3073-3084
  • MSC (2010): Primary 03E15, 03E35, 03E55, 28A05, 54H05
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/13837
  • MathSciNet review: 3787368