Skip to Main Content

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1900, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to longer research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6850 (online) ISSN 0002-9947 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Transactions of the American Mathematical Society is 1.48.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

On the consistency of the combinatorial codifferential
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Douglas N. Arnold, Richard S. Falk, Johnny Guzmán and Gantumur Tsogtgerel PDF
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 5487-5502 Request permission

Abstract:

In 1976, Dodziuk and Patodi employed Whitney forms to define a combinatorial codifferential operator on cochains, and they raised the question whether it is consistent in the sense that for a smooth enough differential form the combinatorial codifferential of the associated cochain converges to the exterior codifferential of the form as the triangulation is refined. In 1991, Smits proved this to be the case for the combinatorial codifferential applied to $1$-forms in two dimensions under the additional assumption that the initial triangulation is refined in a completely regular fashion, by dividing each triangle into four similar triangles. In this paper we extend the result of Smits to arbitrary dimensions, showing that the combinatorial codifferential on $1$-forms is consistent if the triangulations are uniform or piecewise uniform in a certain precise sense. We also show that this restriction on the triangulations is needed, giving a counterexample in which a different regular refinement procedure, namely Whitney’s standard subdivision, is used. Further, we show by numerical example that for $2$-forms in three dimensions, the combinatorial codifferential is not consistent, even for the most regular subdivision process.
References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Douglas N. Arnold
  • Affiliation: School of Mathematics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
  • MR Author ID: 27240
  • Email: arnold@umn.edu
  • Richard S. Falk
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
  • Email: falk@math.rutgers.edu
  • Johnny Guzmán
  • Affiliation: Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
  • MR Author ID: 775211
  • Email: johnny_guzman@brown.edu
  • Gantumur Tsogtgerel
  • Affiliation: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 0B9
  • Email: gantumur@math.mcgill.ca
  • Received by editor(s): December 18, 2012
  • Published electronically: February 26, 2014
  • Additional Notes: The work of the first author was supported by NSF grant DMS-1115291.
    The work of the second author was supported by NSF grant DMS-0910540.
    The work of the fourth author was supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant and an FQRNT Nouveaux Chercheurs Grant.
  • © Copyright 2014 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 5487-5502
  • MSC (2010): Primary 58A10, 65N30; Secondary 39A12, 57Q55, 58A14
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2014-06134-5
  • MathSciNet review: 3240931