Remote Access Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
Green Open Access

Transactions of the American Mathematical Society

ISSN 1088-6850(online) ISSN 0002-9947(print)

 
 

 

Infinitesimally rigid polyhedra. I. Statics of frameworks


Author: Walter Whiteley
Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 285 (1984), 431-465
MSC: Primary 52A25; Secondary 51K99, 70C99, 73K99
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0752486-6
MathSciNet review: 752486
Full-text PDF

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: From the time of Cauchy, mathematicians have studied the motions of convex polyhedra, with the faces held rigid while changes are allowed in the dihedral angles. In the 1940s Alexandrov proved that, even with additional vertices along the natural edges, and with an arbitrary triangulation of the natural faces on these vertices, such polyhedra are infinitesimally rigid. In this paper the dual (and equivalent) concept of static rigidity for frameworks is used to describe the behavior of bar and joint frameworks built around convex (and other) polyhedra. The static techniques introduced provide a new simplified proof of Alexandrov's theorem, as well as an essential extension which characterizes the static properties of frameworks built with more general patterns on the faces, including frameworks with vertices interior to the faces.

The static techniques are presented and employed in a pattern appropriate to the extension of an arbitrary statically rigid framework built around any polyhedron (nonconvex, toroidal, etc.). The techniques are also applied to derive the static rigidity of tensegrity frameworks (with cables and struts in place of bars), and the static rigidity of frameworks projectively equivalent to known polyhedral frameworks. Finally, as an exercise to give an additional perspective to the results in $ 3$-space, detailed analogues of Alexandrov's theorem are presented for convex $ 4$-polytopes built as bar and joint frameworks in $ 4$-space.


References [Enhancements On Off] (What's this?)

  • [1] A. D. Alexandrov, Konvex polyeder, German transl., Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1958.
  • [2] L. Asimow and B. Roth, Rigidity of graphs, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 245 (1978), 279-289. MR 511410 (80i:57004a)
  • [3] -, Rigidity of graphs. II, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 68 (1979), 171-190. MR 531431 (80i:57004b)
  • [4] J. Baracs, Rigidity of articulated panel structures, Bull. Internat. Assoc. for Shell and Spacial Structures 59, Vol. XVI-3, Madrid, 1975.
  • [5] -, Introduction, Structural Topology 1 (1979), 8-12.
  • [6] R. Bricard, Memoire sur la theorie de l'octaedre articulé, J. Math (Liouville) (5) 3 (1897), 113-148.
  • [7] E. D. Bolker and B. Roth, When is a bipartite graph a rigid framework? Pacifie J. Math. 90 (1981), 27-44. MR 599317 (82c:57003)
  • [8] A. Cauchy, Deuxieme memoire sur les polygons et les polyedres, J. Ecole Polytechnique XVIe Cahier (1831), 87-98.
  • [9] R. Connelly, The rigidity of polyhedral surfaces, Math. Mag. 52 (1979), 275-283. MR 551682 (80k:53089)
  • [10] -, The rigidity of certain cabled frameworks and the second order rigidity of arbitrarily triangulated convex surfaces, Adv. in Math. 37 (1980), 272-298. MR 591730 (82a:53059)
  • [11] H. Crapo and W. Whiteley, Statics of frameworks and motions of panel structures: a projective geometric introduction, Structural Topology 6 (1982), 42-82. MR 666680 (84b:51029)
  • [12] H. S. M. Coxeter, Regular polytopes, Dover. New York, 1973. MR 0370327 (51:6554)
  • [13] B. Grünbaum, Convex polytopes, Wiley, New York, 1968.
  • [14] -, Lectures in lost mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 1976, preprint.
  • [15] H. Gluck, Almost all simply connected closed surfaces are rigid, Geometric Topology, Lectures Notes in Math., vol. 438, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1975, pp. 225-239. MR 0400239 (53:4074)
  • [16] L. Henneberg, Die Graphische Statik der Starren Systeme, Liepzig, 1911; Johnson reprint, 1968.
  • [17] N. H. Kuiper, Sphères polyedriques flexible dans $ {E^3}$, d' après Robert Connelly, Sem. Bourbaki 514 (1978), 514-101-514-12. MR 554219 (82a:53060)
  • [18] J. C. Maxwell, On reciprocal figures and diagrams of forces, Philos. Mag. Ser. (4) 27 (1864), 250-261.
  • [19] B. Roth, Rigid and flexible frameworks, Amer. Math. Monthly 88 (1981), 6-20. MR 619413 (83a:57027)
  • [20] B. Roth and W. Whiteley, Rigidity of tensegrity frameorks, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 256 (1981), 419-446. MR 610958 (82m:51018)
  • [21] J. J. Stoker, Geometric problems concerning polyhedra in the large, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 21 (1968), 119-168. MR 0222765 (36:5815)
  • [22] N. White and W. Whiteley, The algebraic geometry of stresses in frameworks, J. Algebraic Discrete Methods 4 (1983), 481-511. MR 721619 (85f:52024)
  • [23] W. Whiteley, Motions, stresses and projected polyhedra, Structural Topology 7 (1983), 13-38. MR 721947 (85h:52010)
  • [24] -, Realizability of polyhedra, Structural Topology 1 (1979), 46-58. MR 621628 (82j:52016)
  • [25] -, Introduction to structural geometry. I. Infinitesimal motions and infinitesimal rigidity, Champlain Reg. Coll., St. Lambert Quebec, preprint 1977.
  • [26] -, Introduction to structural geometry. II. Statics and stresses, Champlain Reg. Coll. St. Lambert, Quebec, preprint 1978.
  • [27] -, Infinitesimally rigid polyhedra. II. Articulated panels (to appear).
  • [28] -, The static and infinitesimal rigidity of sheet structures (to appear).

Similar Articles

Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC: 52A25, 51K99, 70C99, 73K99

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC: 52A25, 51K99, 70C99, 73K99


Additional Information

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1984-0752486-6
Article copyright: © Copyright 1984 American Mathematical Society

American Mathematical Society