|
Separable Banach space theory needs strong set existence axioms
Author(s):
A.
James
Humphreys;
Stephen
G.
Simpson
Journal:
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
348
(1996),
4231-4255.
MSC (1991):
Primary 03F35;
Secondary 46B10, 46B45
MathSciNet review:
1373639
Retrieve article in:
PDF
This article is available free of charge
Abstract |
Similar articles |
Additional information
Abstract:
We investigate the strength of set existence axioms needed for separable Banach space theory. We show that a very strong axiom, comprehension, is needed to prove such basic facts as the existence of the weak- closure of any norm-closed subspace of . This is in contrast to earlier work in which theorems of separable Banach space theory were proved in very weak subsystems of second order arithmetic, subsystems which are conservative over Primitive Recursive Arithmetic for sentences. En route to our main results, we prove the Krein-\v{S}mulian theorem in , and we give a new, elementary proof of a result of McGehee on weak- sequential closure ordinals.
Similar Articles:
Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical
Society
with
MSC (1991):
03F35,
46B10, 46B45
Retrieve articles in all Journals with
MSC (1991):
03F35,
46B10, 46B45
Additional Information:
A.
James
Humphreys
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvannia 16802
Email:
jimbo@math.psu.edu
Stephen
G.
Simpson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvannia 16802
Email:
simpson@math.psu.edu
DOI:
10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01725-4
PII:
S 0002-9947(96)01725-4
Keywords:
Reverse mathematics,
separable Banach space theory,
weak-$*$ topology,
closure ordinals,
Krein-\v Smulian theorem
Received by editor(s):
July 10, 1995
Additional Notes:
This research was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-9303478. We would also like to thank our colleague Robert E. Huff for showing us his unpublished notes on the Krein-Smulian theorem, and the referee for helpful comments which improved the exposition of this paper.
Copyright of article:
Copyright
1996,
American Mathematical Society
|