Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS
|
   
Available in electronic format
Available in print format
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
ISSN 1088-6850(e) ISSN 0002-9947(p)

     

Cycling in proofs and feasibility

Author(s): A. Carbone
Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000), 2049-2075.
MSC (1991): Primary 03F07, 03F20, 03F05, 03H15, 68R10
Posted: September 8, 1999
MathSciNet review: 1603882
Retrieve article in: PDF
This article is available free of charge

Abstract | References | Similar articles | Additional information

Abstract: There is a common perception by which small numbers are considered more concrete and large numbers more abstract. A mathematical formalization of this idea was introduced by Parikh (1971) through an inconsistent theory of feasible numbers in which addition and multiplication are as usual but for which some very large number is defined to be not feasible. Parikh shows that sufficiently short proofs in this theory can only prove true statements of arithmetic. We pursue these topics in light of logical flow graphs of proofs (Buss, 1991) and show that Parikh's lower bound for concrete consistency reflects the presence of cycles in the logical graphs of short proofs of feasibility of large numbers. We discuss two concrete constructions which show the bound to be optimal and bring out the dynamical aspect of formal proofs. For this paper the concept of feasible numbers has two roles, as an idea with its own life and as a vehicle for exploring general principles on the dynamics and geometry of proofs. Cycles can be seen as a measure of how complicated a proof can be. We prove that short proofs must have cycles.


References:

1.
P. Bernays. Sur le platonisme dans les mathématiques. L'Enseignement Mathématique, 34:52-69, 1935.

2.
G. Boolos. Don't eliminate cut. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 13:373-378, 1984. MR 85i:03029

3.
S. Buss. The undecidability of $k$-provability. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 53:72-102, 1991. MR 92g:03071

4.
A. Carbone. On Logical Flow Graphs. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of The City University of New York, May 1993.

5.
A. Carbone. Interpolants, Cut Elimination and Flow Graphs for the Propositional Calculus. In Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 83:249-299, 1997. MR 98i:03073

6.
A. Carbone. Turning cycles into spirals. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 96:57-73, 1997.

7.
A. Carbone. Proofs and Groups with distorted Length Function. Manuscript, 1996.

8.
A. Carbone and S. Semmes. Looking from the inside and from the outside. I.H.E.S. preprint M/96/44, 1996 (Bures-sur-Yvette, France).

9.
A. Carbone and S. Semmes. Making proofs without Modus Ponens: An introduction to the combinatorics and complexity of cut elimination. In Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 34:131-159, 1997. MR 98c:03112

10.
A. Carbone and S. Semmes. Geometry, Symmetry and Implicit Representations of Combinatorial Structures. Book in preparation, 1997.

11.
A.G. Dragalin. Correctness of inconsistent theories with notion of feasibility. In LNCS 208, pages 58-79. Springer Verlag, 1985. MR 87e:03150

12.
M.E. Dummett. Wang's paradox. In Truth and Other Enigmas, pages 248-268. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978. Also appeared in Synthèse 30:301-324, 1975.

13.
M.E. Dummett. Wittgenstein's philosophy of mathematics. In Truth and Other Enigmas, pages 166-185. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1978. Also appeared in The Philosophical Review, Cornell University, 1959.

14.
A.S. Esenin-Volpin. Le programme ultra-intuitionniste des fondements des mathématiques. In Infinitistic Methods, Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Mathematics, pages 201-223. PWN. Warsaw, 1961. MR 26:4905

15.
A.S. Esenin-Volpin. The ultra-intuitionistic criticism and the antitraditional program for foundations of mathematics. In A. Kino, J. Myhill, and R.E. Vesley, editors, Intuitionism and Proof Theory, pages 3-45. North-Holland, 1970. MR 45:4938

16.
R.O. Gandy. Limitation to mathematical knowledge. In D. van Dalen, D. Lascar, and J. Smiley, editors, Logic Colloquium 80, pages 129-146. North-Holland Publishing Company, 1982. MR 84d:00010

17.
J.Y. Girard. Proof Theory and Logical Complexity, volume 1 of Studies in Proof Theory, Monographs. Bibliopolis, 1987. MR 89a:03113

18.
J.Y. Girard. Linear Logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 50:1-102, 1987. MR 89m:03057

19.
S.C. Kleene. Introduction to Metamathematics, volume 1 of Bibliotheca Mathematica, Monographs on Pure and Applied Mathematics. Groningen, Walters-Noordhoff, 1988.

20.
G. Kreisel. Axiomatizations of nonstandard analysis that are conservative extensions of formal systems for classical standard analysis. In Application of Model Theory, W.A.J. Luxemburg, editor, pages 93-106. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1969. MR 39:50

21.
G. Mannoury. Methodologisches und Philosophisches zur Elementar-Mathematik. Visser, Haarlem, 1909.

22.
E. Nelson. Predicative Arithmetic. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1986. MR 88c:03061

23.
R. Parikh. A conservation result. In W.A.J. Luxemburg, editor, Application of Model Theory, pages 107-108. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1969. MR 38:3145

24.
V. P. Orevkov. Lower Bounds for increasing complexity of derivations after cut elimination. Journal of Soviet Mathematics, 20(4), 1982.

25.
R. Parikh. Existence and feasibility in arithmetic. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 36:494-508, 1971. MR 46:3287

26.
R. Parikh. The problem of vague predicates. In Language, Logic and Method, R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, editors, pages 241-261. 1983.

27.
H. Poincaré. The Foundations of Science. Science Press, 1913.

28.
V.Yu. Sazonov. On feasible numbers. In Proceedings of The Kleene's Conference on Mathematical Logic, Varna, 1990.

29.
R. Statman. Bounds for proof-search and speed-up in predicate calculus. In Annals of Mathematical Logic, 15:225-287. 1978. MR 81c:03049

30.
G. Takeuti. Proof Theory, volume 81 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North Holland, 1975. MR 58:27366a

31.
A.S. Troelstra. Remarks on intuitionism and the philosophy of mathematics (revised version). In Proceedings of the Congresso Internazionale ``Nuovi Problemi della Logica e della Filosofia della Scienza'', Viareggio 8-13 January, 1990.

32.
G.S. Tseitin. The complexity of a deduction in the propositional predicate calculus. In Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad Otd. Mat. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 8:234-259. 1968. MR 43:6098

33.
P. Vopenka. Mathematics in the Alternative Set Theory. Teubner, Leipzig, 1979. MR 83f:03051

34.
L. Wittgenstein. In Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. R. Rhees, G.H. von Wright and G.E.M. Anscombe, editors, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1978. Revised Version. MR 80f:00009


Similar Articles:

Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (1991): 03F07, 03F20, 03F05, 03H15, 68R10

Retrieve articles in all Journals with MSC (1991): 03F07, 03F20, 03F05, 03H15, 68R10


Additional Information:

A. Carbone
Affiliation: Math\a'{e}matiques/Informatique, Universit\a'{e} de Paris XII, 61 Avenue du G\a'{e}n\a'{e}ral de Gaulle, 94010 Cr\a'{e}teil Cedex, France
Email: ale@gauss.math.jussieu.fr, ale@univ-paris12.fr

DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-99-02300-4
PII: S 0002-9947(99)02300-4
Keywords: Feasible numbers, cut elimination, cycles in proofs, structure of proofs, complexity of proofs.
Received by editor(s): June 13, 1997
Received by editor(s) in revised form: January 21, 1998
Posted: September 8, 1999
Additional Notes: Partially supported by the Lise-Meitner Stipendium # M00187-MAT (Austrian FWF)
Copyright of article: Copyright 2000, American Mathematical Society




AMS and Social Media LinkedIn Facebook Podcasts Twitter YouTube RSS Feeds Blogs Wikipedia