Publications Meetings The Profession Membership Programs Math Samplings Policy & Advocacy In the News About the AMS
|
   
Available in electronic format
Available in print format
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
ISSN 1088-6850(e) ISSN 0002-9947(p)

     

Some counterexamples to a generalized Saari's conjecture


Author: Gareth E. Roberts
Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 251-265
MSC (2000): Primary 70F10, 70F15; Secondary 37J45
Posted: January 21, 2005
MathSciNet review: 2171232
Full-text PDF Free Access

Abstract | References | Similar Articles | Additional Information

Abstract: For the Newtonian $n$-body problem, Saari's conjecture states that the only solutions with a constant moment of inertia are relative equilibria, solutions rigidly rotating about their center of mass. We consider the same conjecture applied to Hamiltonian systems with power-law potential functions. A family of counterexamples is given in the five-body problem (including the Newtonian case) where one of the masses is taken to be negative. The conjecture is also shown to be false in the case of the inverse square potential and two kinds of counterexamples are presented. One type includes solutions with collisions, derived analytically, while the other consists of periodic solutions shown to exist using standard variational methods.


References

  • 1. A. Albouy, The symmetric central configurations of four equal masses, Hamiltonian dynamics and celestial mechanics (Seattle, WA, 1995), Contemp. Math., vol. 198, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1996, pp. 131-135. MR 1409157 (97g:70012)
  • 2. A. Chenciner, Action minimizing periodic orbits in the Newtonian $n$-body problem, Celestial mechanics (Evanston, IL, 1999), Contemp. Math., vol. 292, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 71-90. MR 1884893 (2004b:70023)
  • 3. -, Some facts and more questions about the Eight, Topological methods, variational methods and their applications (Taiyuan, 2002), World Sci. Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 2003, pp. 77-88. MR 2010643
  • 4. W. Gordon, Conservative dynamical systems involving strong forces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 204 (1975), 113-135. MR 0377983 (51:14152)
  • 5. C. Jacobi, Vorlesungen über dynamik, Reimer Publisher, Berlin, 1866.
  • 6. C. McCord, Saari's conjecture for the planar three-body problem with equal masses, preprint, October 2002.
  • 7. R. Moeckel, A computer-assisted proof of Saari's conjecture for the planar three-body problem, preprint, July 2003.
  • 8. Richard Moeckel, On central configurations, Math. Z. 205 (1990), no. 4, 499–517. MR 1082871 (92b:70012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02571259
  • 9. Richard Moeckel, Relative equilibria of the four-body problem, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 5 (1985), no. 3, 417–435. MR 805839 (87b:70011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143385700003047
  • 10. R. Montgomery, Action spectrum and collisions in the planar three-body problem, Celestial mechanics (Evanston, IL, 1999), Contemp. Math., vol. 292, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 173-184. MR 1884899 (2003a:70012)
  • 11. Richard Montgomery, The 𝑁-body problem, the braid group, and action-minimizing periodic solutions, Nonlinearity 11 (1998), no. 2, 363–376. MR 1610784 (99a:70019), http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/11/2/011
  • 12. H. Poincaré, Sur les solutions périodiques et le principe de moindre action, Comptes Rendus 123 (1896), 915-918.
  • 13. Gareth E. Roberts, A continuum of relative equilibria in the five-body problem, Phys. D 127 (1999), no. 3-4, 141–145. MR 1669486 (2000c:70010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00315-7
  • 14. D. Saari, On bounded solutions of the $n$-body problem, Periodic Orbits, Stability and Resonances, G. Giacaglia ed., D. Riedel, Dordrecht (1970), 76-81.
  • 15. -, On the role and the properties of $n$-body central configurations, Celestial Mech. 21 (1980), no. 1, 9-20. MR 0564603 (81a:70016)
  • 16. Steve Smale, Mathematical problems for the next century, Math. Intelligencer 20 (1998), no. 2, 7–15. MR 1631413 (99h:01033), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03025291
  • 17. A. Wintner, The Analytical Foundations of Celestial Mechanics, Princeton Math. Series 5, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1941.MR 0005824 (3:215b)

Similar Articles

Retrieve articles in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society with MSC (2000): 70F10, 70F15, 37J45

Retrieve articles in all journals with MSC (2000): 70F10, 70F15, 37J45


Additional Information

Gareth E. Roberts
Affiliation: Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, 1 College Street, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610
Email: groberts@radius.holycross.edu

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03697-4
PII: S 0002-9947(05)03697-4
Keywords: Saari's conjecture, $n$-body problems, relative equilibria, Hamiltonian systems
Received by editor(s): September 12, 2003
Received by editor(s) in revised form: February 9, 2004.
Posted: January 21, 2005
Article copyright: © Copyright 2005 American Mathematical Society
The copyright for this article reverts to public domain after 28 years from publication.




AMS and Social Media LinkedIn Facebook Podcasts Twitter YouTube RSS Feeds Blogs Wikipedia