Constructive projective extension of an incidence plane
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer
- by Mark Mandelkern PDF
- Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 691-706 Request permission
Abstract:
A standard procedure in classical projective geometry, using pencils of lines to extend an incidence plane to a projective plane, is examined from a constructive viewpoint. Brouwerian counterexamples reveal the limitations of traditional pencils. Generalized definitions are adopted to construct a projective extension. The main axioms of projective geometry are verified. The methods used are in accordance with Bishop-type modern constructivism.References
- Errett Bishop, Book Review: The foundations of intuitionistic mathematics, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1965), no. 6, 850–852. MR 1566375, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9904-1965-11412-4
- Errett Bishop, Foundations of constructive analysis, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-Toronto, Ont.-London, 1967. MR 0221878
- Errett Bishop and Douglas Bridges, Constructive analysis, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 279, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985. MR 804042, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-61667-9
- Douglas Bridges and Fred Richman, Varieties of constructive mathematics, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 97, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987. MR 890955, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511565663
- L. E. J. Brouwer, De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes. Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 2 (1908), 152-158. English translation, “The Unreliability of the Logical Principles”, pp. 107–111, in Heyting, A. (ed.), L. E. J. Brouwer: Collected Works 1: Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics. Amsterdam-New York, Elsevier, 1975.
- D. van Dalen, Extension problems in intuitionistic plane projective geometry. I, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A 66=Indag. Math. 25 (1963), 349–368. MR 0153567, DOI 10.1016/S1385-7258(63)50035-3
- A. Heyting, Axioms for intuitionistic plane affine geometry, Proceedings of an International Symposium held at the Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, Dec. 26, 1957-Jan. 4, 1958, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1959, pp. 160–173. The axiomatic method; With special reference to geometry and Physics; Edited by L. Henkin, P. Suppes and A. Tarski. MR 0120154
- Mark Mandelkern, Constructive continuity, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 42 (1983), no. 277, v+117. MR 690901, DOI 10.1090/memo/0277
- Mark Mandelkern, Constructive mathematics, Math. Mag. 58 (1985), no. 5, 272–280. MR 810148, DOI 10.2307/1163031
- Mark Mandelkern, Limited omniscience and the Bolzano-Weierstrass principle, Bull. London Math. Soc. 20 (1988), no. 4, 319–320. MR 940284, DOI 10.1112/blms/20.4.319
- —, Brouwerian counterexamples, Math. Mag. 62 (1989), 3-27.
- —, Constructive coordinatization of Desarguesian planes, Beiträge Algebra Geom. 48 (2007), 547-589.
- Mark Mandelkern, The common point problem in constructive projective geometry, Indag. Math. (N.S.) 24 (2013), no. 1, 111–114. MR 2997755, DOI 10.1016/j.indag.2012.07.001
- Fred Richman, Meaning and information in constructive mathematics, Amer. Math. Monthly 89 (1982), no. 6, 385–388. MR 660918, DOI 10.2307/2321650
- Fred Richman, Omniscience principles and functions of bounded variation, MLQ Math. Log. Q. 48 (2002), no. 1, 111–116. MR 1874208, DOI 10.1002/1521-3870(200201)48:1<111::AID-MALQ111>3.3.CO;2-Y
- Gabriel Stolzenberg, Review: Foundations of constructive analysis by Errett Bishop, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1970), 301–323. MR 257687, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9904-1970-12455-7
Additional Information
- Mark Mandelkern
- Affiliation: Department of Mathematics, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003
- Email: mandelkern@member.ams.org
- Received by editor(s): February 2, 2012
- Published electronically: August 8, 2013
- © Copyright 2013
American Mathematical Society
The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication. - Journal: Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), 691-706
- MSC (2010): Primary 51A45; Secondary 03F65
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-2013-05880-1
- MathSciNet review: 3130314