Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
V. Bafna and P. Pevzner. Sorting by reversals: Genome rearrangement in plant organelles and evolutionary history of X chromosome. Mol. Biol. Evol, 12:239–246, 1995.
B. Bollobás. Random Graphs. Academic Press, New York, 1985.
G. Bourque and P. A. Pevzner. Genome-scale evolution: Reconstructing gene orders in ancestral species. Genome Res., 12:26–36, 2002.
B. P. Chowdhary, L. Fronicke, I. Gustavsson, and H. Scherthan. Comparative analysis of cattle and human genomes: Detection of ZOO-FISH and gene mapping-based chromosomal homologies. Mammalian Genome, 7:297–302, 1996.
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature, 420:520–562, 2002.
S. Doganlar, A. Frary, M. C. Daunay, R. N. Lester, and S. D. Tanksley. A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongea) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 162:1697–1711, 2002.
R. Durrett. Probability Models for DNA Sequence Evolution. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
R. Durrett. Shuffling chromosomes. J. Theor. Prob., 16:725–750, 2003.
R. Durrett, R. Nielsen, and T. L. York. Bayesian estimation of genomic distance. 2004.
M. J. Band et al. An ordered comparative map of the cattle and human genomes. Genome Res., 10:1359–1368, 2000.
S. Hannenhalli and P. A. Pevzner. Transforming cabbage into turnip (polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals). In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pages 178–189. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1995.
S. Hannenhalli and P. A. Pevzner. Transforming men into mice (polynomial algorithm for the genomic distance problem). In Proceedings of the 36th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 581–592. IEEE, New York, 1995.
D. L. Hartl and E. W. Jones. Genetics: The Analysis of Genes and Genomes. Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury, MA, 2000.
H. Hayes. Chromosome painting with human chromosome-specific DNA libraries reveals the extent and distribution of conserved segments in bovine chromosomes. Cytogenet. Cell. Genetics, 71:168–174, 1995.
T. Luczak, B. Pittel, and J. C. Weirman. The structure of the random graph at the point of phase transition. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 341:721–748, 1994.
J. H. Nadeau and D. Sankoff. The lengths of undiscovered conserved segments in comparative maps. Mammalian Genome, 9:491–495, 1998.
J. H. Nadeau and B. A. Taylor. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81:814–818, 1984.
P. A. Pevzner. Computational Molecular Biology: An Algorithmic Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000.
P. A. Pevzner and G. Tesler. Genome rearrangement in mammalian evolution: Lessons from human and mouse genomes. Genome Research., 13:37–45, 2003.
J. M. Ranz, F. Casals, and A. Ruiz. How malleable is the eukaryotic genome? Extreme rate of chromosomal rearrangement in the genus Drosophila. Genome Res., 11:230–239, 2001.
J. M. Ranz, S. Segarra, and A. Ruiz. Chromosomal homology and molecular organization of Muller’s element D and E in the Drosophila repleta species group. Genetics, 145:281–295, 1997.
T. L. York, R. Durrett, and R. Nielsen. Bayesian estimation of the number of inversions in the history of two chromosomes. J. Comp. Biol., 9:805–818, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Durrett, R. (2005). Genome Rearrangement. In: Statistical Methods in Molecular Evolution. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27733-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27733-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-22333-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27733-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)