Skip to main content

On the Optimality of Stein Factors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Probability Approximations and Beyond

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNSP,volume 205))

Abstract

The application of Stein’s method for distributional approximation often involves so-called Stein factors (also called magic factors) in the bound of the solutions to Stein equations. However, in some cases these factors contain additional (undesirable) logarithmic terms. It has been shown for many Stein factors that the known bounds are sharp and thus that these additional logarithmic terms cannot be avoided in general. However, no probabilistic examples have appeared in the literature that would show that these terms in the Stein factors are not just unavoidable artefacts, but that they are there for a good reason. In this article we close this gap by constructing such examples. This also leads to a new interpretation of the solutions to Stein equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arratia R, Goldstein L, Gordon L (1989) Two moments suffice for Poisson approximations: the Chen–Stein method. Ann Probab 17:9–25

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbour AD (1988) Stein’s method and Poisson process convergence. J Appl Probab 25A:175–184

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbour AD (2005) Multivariate Poisson-binomial approximation using Stein’s method. In: Stein’s method and applications. Lecture notes series, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore, vol 5. Singapore University Press, Singapore, pp 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barbour AD, Brown TC (1992) Stein’s method and point process approximation. Stoch Process Appl 43:9–31

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbour AD, Eagleson GK (1983) Poisson approximation for some statistics based on exchangeable trials. Adv Appl Probab 15:585–600

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Barbour AD, Utev SA (1998) Solving the Stein equation in compound Poisson approximation. Adv Appl Probab 30:449–475

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbour AD, Chen LHY, Loh W-L (1992) Compound Poisson approximation for nonnegative random variables via Stein’s method. Ann Prob 20:1843–1866

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbour AD, Holst L, Janson S (1992) Poisson approximation. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown TC, Xia A (1995) On Stein–Chen factors for Poisson approximation. Statist Probab Lett 23:327–332

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown TC, Weinberg GV, Xia A (2000) Removing logarithms from Poisson process error bounds. Stoch Process Appl 87:149–165

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Cacoullos T, Papathanasiou V, Utev SA (1994) Variational inequalities with examples and an application to the central limit theorem. Ann Probab 22:1607–1618

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen LHY (1998) Stein’s method: some perspectives with applications. In: Probability towards 2000, Lecture notes in statistics, vol 128. Springer, New York, pp 97–122

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen LHY, Röllin A (2010) Stein couplings for normal approximation. Preprint (2010). Available via arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.6039

  14. Chen LHY, Shao Q-M (2004) Normal approximation under local dependence. Ann Probab 32:1985–2028

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Papathanasiou V, Utev SA (1995) Integro-differential inequalities and the Poisson approximation. Siberian Adv Math 5:120–132

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuhmacher D (2005) Upper bounds for spatial point process approximations. Ann Appl Probab 15:615–651

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Schuhmacher D, Xia A (2008) A new metric between distributions of point processes. Adv Appl Probab 40:651–672

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein C (1972) A bound for the error in the normal approximation to the distribution of a sum of dependent random variables. In: Proceedings of the 6th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 2. University California Press, Berkeley, pp 583–602

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stein C (1986) Approximate computation of expectations. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Gesine Reinert and Dominic Schuhmacher for fruitful discussions and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Röllin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Röllin, A. (2012). On the Optimality of Stein Factors. In: Barbour, A., Chan, H., Siegmund, D. (eds) Probability Approximations and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Statistics(), vol 205. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1966-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics