Skip to main content
Log in

Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems

  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using the theory of random point processes, a method is presented whereby functional relationships between neurons can be detected and modeled. The method is based on a point process characterization involving stochastic intensities and an additive rate function model. Estimates are based on the maximum likelihood (ML) principle and asymptotic properties are examined in the absence of a stationarity assumption. An iterative algorithm that computes the ML estimates is presented. It is based on the expectation/maximization (EM) procedure of Dempster et al. (1977) and makes ML identification accessible to models requiring many parameters. Examples illustrating the use of the method are also presented. These examples are derived from simulations of simple neural systems that cannot be identified using correlation techniques. It is shown that the ML method correctly identifies each of these systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aalen O (1978) Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Ann Stat 6:701–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aertsen Ad MHJ, Gerstein GL (1985) Evaluation of neuronal connectivity: sensitivity of cross-correlation. Brain Res 340:341–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley P (1961) Statistical inference for Markov processes. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Boogaard H van den (1986) Maximum likelihood estimations in a nonlinear self-exciting point process model. Biol Cybern 55:219–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borisyuk GN, Borisyuk RM, Kirillov AB, Kovalenko EI, Kryukov VI (1985) A new statistical method for identifying interconnections between neuronal network elements. Biol Cybern 52:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breŕnaud P (1981) Point processes and queues: martingale dynamics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brillinger DR (1975) The identification of point process systems. Ann Probab 3:909–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chornoboy ES (1986) Maximum likelihood techniques for the identification of neural point processes, Ph.D. Thesis. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md

  • Cover TM (1984) An algorithm for maximizing expected log investment return. IEEE Trans IT-30:369–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1972) The statistical analysis of dependencies in point processes. In: Lewis PA (ed) Stochastic point processes. Wiley, New York, pp 55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Csiszár I, Tusnády G (1984) Information geometry and alternating minimization procedures. Statistics and decisions. [Suppl.] 1:205–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc, Ser B 39:1–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib MH, Sen PK (1985) Non-stationary stochastic point-process models in neurophysiology with applications to learning, In: Sen PK (ed) Biostatistics: statistics in biomedical. Public health and environmental sciences. Elsevier, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes AG (1971) Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika 58:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr AF (1986) Point processes and their statistical inference. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr AF (1987) Maximum likelihood estimation in the multiplicative intensity model. Ann Stat 15:473–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood PA (1979) On the use and interpretation of cross-correlation measurements in the mammalian central nervous system. J Neurosci Methods 1:107–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luenberger DG (1984) Linear and nonlinear programming. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeague IW (1986) Nonparametric inference in additive risk models for counting processes, Florida State University Technical Report No. M741

  • Marmarelis PZ, Marmarelis VZ (1978) Analysis of physiological systems: the white-noise approach. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ogata Y (1978) The asymptotic behavior of maximum likelihood estimators for stationary point processes, Ann Inst Stat Math Part A 30:243–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters C, Coberly WA (1976) The numerical evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of mixture proportions, Commun Statist Theor Methods A 5:1127–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatigorskii B Ya, Kastyukov AI, Chinarov VA, Cherkasskii VL (1984) Deterministic and stochastic identification of neurophysiological systems. Neirofiziologiya 16:419–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepp LA, Vardi Y (1982) Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans MI-1:113–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi Y, Shepp LA, Kaufman L (1983) A statistical model for positron emission tomography. J Am Stat Assoc 80:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chornoboy, E.S., Schramm, L.P. & Karr, A.F. Maximum likelihood identification of neural point process systems. Biol. Cybern. 59, 265–275 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332915

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332915

Keywords

Navigation