Skip to main content
Log in

Exact controllability of the wave equation with Neumann boundary control

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics and Optimization Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider the wave equation defined on a smooth bounded domainΩ⊂R n with boundary Γ=Γ0⋃Γ1, with Γ0 possibly empty and Γ1 nonempty and relatively open in Γ. The control action is exercised in the Neumann boundary conditions only on Γ1, while homogeneous boundary conditions of Dirichlet type are imposed on the complementary part Γ0. We study by a direct method (i.e., without passing through “uniform stabilization”) the problem of exact controllability on some finite time interval [0,T] for initial data on some preassigned spaceZ=Z 1 ×Z 2 based on Ω and with control functions in some preassigned space\(V_{\Sigma _1 } \) based on Γ1 and [0,T]. We consider several choices of pairs [Z,\(V_{\Sigma _1 } \)] of spaces, and others may be likewise studied by similar methods. Our main results are exact controllability results in the following cases: (i)\(Z = H_{\Gamma _0 }^1 (\Omega ) \times L^2 (\Omega )\) and\(V_{\Sigma _1 } = L^2 (\Sigma _1 ); (ii) Z = L^2 (\Omega ) \times [H_{\Gamma _0 }^1 (\Omega )]\prime \) and\(V_{\Sigma _1 } = [H^1 (0,T;L^2 (\Gamma _1 ))]\prime \), both under suitable geometrical conditions on the triplet {Ω, Γ0, Γ1} expressed in terms of a general vector field; (iii)Z = L 2 (Ω)×[H 1 (Ω)]′ in the Neumann case Γ0=Ø in the absence of geometrical conditions on Ω, but with a special classV Σ of controls, larger thanL 2 (Σ). The key technical issues are, in all cases, lower bounds on theL 2 1)-norm of appropriate traces of the solution to the corresponding homogeneous problem. These are obtained by multiplier techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Chen, Energy decay estimates and exact boundary value controllability for the wave equation in a bounded domain, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 58 (1979), 249–274.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Chen, A note on the boundary stabilization of the wave equation, SIAM J. Control Optim. 19 (1981), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Flandoli, I. Lasiecka, and R. Triggiani, Algebraic Riccati equations with nonsmoothing observation arising in hyperbolic and Euler-Bernoulli boundary control problems, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., to appear.

  4. K. Graham and D. L. Russell, Boundary value control of the wave equation in a spherical region, SIAM J. Control 13 (1975), 174–196.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. F. Ho, Observabilité frontiere de l'equation des ondes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 302 (1986), 443–446.

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Hörmander, Linear Partial Differential Operators, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1969, Third revised printing.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. John, On linear partial differential equations with analytic coefficients—unique continuation of data. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 2 (1949), 209–253.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Lagnese, Boundary value control of a class of hyperbolic equations in a general region, SIAM J. Control Optim. 13 (1975), 174–186.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Lagnese, Boundary patch control of the wave equation in some non-star complemented regions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 77 (1980), 364–380.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Lagnese, Decay of solutions of wave equations in a bounded region with boundary dissipation, J. Differential Equations 50 (1983), 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. L. Lions, Contrôle des systèmes distribués singuliers, Gauthier Villars, Paris, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. L. Lions, Contrôlabilité exacte de systèmes distribués, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 302 (1986), 471–475.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. L. Lions, Contrôlabilité exacte de systèmes distribués: remarques sur la théorie générale et les applications, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Analysis and Optimization of Systems, Antibes, June 25–27, 1986, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–13.

  14. J. L. Lions, Exact controllability of distributed systems. An introduction, Proceedings of the 25th Conference on Decision and Control, Athens, December, 1986, pp. 731–738.

  15. J. L. Lions, Exact controllability, stabilization and perturbations, J. von Neumann Lecture, SIAM Rev. 30 (1988), 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. L. Lions, Controllability exacte, perturbations et stabilization de systemes distribues, vols. 1 and 2, Masson, Paris, 1988, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Littman, Boundary control theory for hyperbolic and parabolic partial differential equations with constant coefficients, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa, Cl. Sci. (IV) 3 (1978), 567–580.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Littman, Near optimal time boundary controllability for a class of hyperbolic equations, Proceedings of the IFIP WG7.2 Working Conference on Control Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations, Gainesville, Florida, February 3–6, 1986, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 97, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Littman, private communication.

  20. I. Lasiecka, J. L. Lions, and R. Triggiani, Nonhomogeneous boundary value problems for second-order hyperbolic operators, J. Math. Pures Appl. 65 (1986), 149–192.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. L. Lions and E. Magenes, Nonhomogeneous Boundary Value Problems, vol. I, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, A cosine operator approach to modelingL 2 (0, T; L 2 (Γ))-boundary input hyperbolic equations, Appl. Math. Optim. 7 (1981), 35–83.

    Google Scholar 

  23. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, Uniform exponential energy decay of the wave equation in a bounded region withL 2(0, ∞; L 2 (Γ))-feedback control in the Dirichlet boundary conditions, J. Differential Equations 66 (1987), 340–390.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, Sharp regularity results for second-order hyperbolic equations of Neumann type, Preprint, to appear.

  25. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, Regularity of hyperbolic equations underL 2 (0, T; L 2 (Γ))-boundary terms, Appl. Math. Optim. 10 (1983), 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, Riccati equations for hyperbolic partial-differential equations withL 2 (0, T; L 2 (Γ))-Dirichlet boundary terms, SIAM J. Control Optim. 24 (1986), 884–926.

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Lasiecka and R. Triggiani, A direct approach to exact controllability for the wave equation with Neumann boundary control and to a Euler-Bernoulli equation, Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference, Los Angeles, December, 1987, pp. 529–534.

  28. D. L. Russell, Controllability and stabilizability theory for linear partial differential equations. Recent progress and open questions, SIAM Rev. 20 (1978), 639–739.

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. L. Russell, Exact boundary value controllability theorems for wave and heat equations in star-complemented regions, in Differential Games and Control Theory (E. O. Roxin, P. T. Liu, and R. Steinberg, eds), Marcel Dekker, New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. L. Russell, A unified boundary controllability theory for hyperbolic and parabolic partial differential equations, Stud. Appl. Math. 52 (1973), 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Triggiani, Exact boundary controllability onL 2 (Ω)×H −1 (Ω) for the wave equation with Dirichlet control acting on a portion of the boundary, and related problems. Appl. Math. Optim., to appear. Also, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, vol. 102, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 292–332.

  32. R. Triggiani, Wave equation on a bounded domain with boundary dissipation; an operator approach, J. Math. Anal. Appl., to appear. Also in Operator Methods for Optimal Control Problems (Sung J. Lee, ed.), Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 108, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987, pp. 283–310 (Proceedings of a Special Session held at the Annual Meeting of the A.M.S., New Orleans, January, 1986). Also in Recent Advances in Communication and Control Theory (R. E. Kalmanet al. eds), Optimization Software, New York, 1987, pp. 262–286 (volume in honor of A. V. Balakrishnan's 60th birthday).

  33. R. Triggiani, A cosine operator approach to modeling boundary input problems for hyperbolic systems, Proceedings of the 8th IFIP Conference, Würzburg, September, 1977, Lecture Notes on Control and Information Sciences, vol. 6, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 380–390.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Triggiani, Preliminary version of this joint paper presented at the IFIP Conference, Nice, June 10–13, 1986, in Lecture Notes in Control Sciences (J. P. Zolezio, ed.), vol. 100, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 317–371.

  35. R. Triggiani, Exact controllability in the presence of damping, Proceedings of the International Conference on Theory and Applications of Differential Equations, Columbus, Ohio, March 1988, to appear.

  36. A. Taylor and D. Lay, Introduction to Functional Analysis, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lasiecka, I., Triggiani, R. Exact controllability of the wave equation with Neumann boundary control. Appl Math Optim 19, 243–290 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448201

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01448201

Keywords

Navigation