Skip to main content
Log in

Algebraic independence of elementary functions and its application to Masser's vanishing theorem

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
aequationes mathematicae Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Here is an improvement on Masser's Refined Identity (D. W. Masser:A vanishing theorem for power series. Invent. Math.67 (1982), 275–296). The present method depends on a result from differential algebra andp-adic analysis. The investigation from the viewpoint ofp-adic analysis makes the proof clearer and, in particular, it is possible to exclude the concept of “density” which is necessary in Masser's treatment. That is to say, the theorem will be stated as follows: Let Ω = (ω ij ) be a nonsingular matrix inM n (ℤ) with no roots of unity as eigenvalue. LetP(z) be a nonzero polynomial inC[z],z = (z 1,⋯,z n ). Letx = (x 1,⋯,x n ) be an element ofC n withx i ≠ 0 for eachi. Define

$$\Omega x = \left( {\prod\limits_{i = 1}^n {x_i^{\omega 1_i } ,...,} \prod\limits_{i = 1}^n {x_i^{\omega _{ni} } } } \right)$$

. IfPk x) = 0 for infinitely many positive integersk, thenx 1,⋯,x n are multiplicatively dependent.

To prove this, the following fact on elementary functions will be needed: LetK be an ordinary differential field andC be its field of constants. LetR be a differential field extension ofK andu 1,⋯,u m be elements ofR such that the field of constants ofR is the same asC and for eachi the field extensionK i =K(u 1,⋯,u i ) ofK is a differential one such thatu i =t i−1 u i for somet i−1K i−1 oru i is algebraic overK i−1. Letf 1,⋯,f n R be distinct elements moduloC and suppose that for eachi there is a nonzeroe i R withe′ i =f′ i e i . Thene 1,⋯,e n are linearly independent overK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ax, J.,On Schanuel's conjectures. Annals of Math.93 (1971), 252–268.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cassels, J. W. S.,An embedding theorem for fields. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc.14 (1976), 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koblitz, N.,p-adic numbers, p-adic analysis and zeta-functions (2nd ed. (Graduate Texts in Math. Vol. 58). Springer, New York and Berlin, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kolchin, E. R.,Algebraic groups and algebraic dependence. Amer. J. Math.90 (1968), 1151–1164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Masser, D. W.,A vanishing theorem for power series. Invent. Math.67 (1982), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenlicht, M.,On Liouville's theory of elementary functions. Pacific J. Math.65 (1976), 485–492.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenlicht, M. andSinger, M.,On elementary, generalized elementary and Liouvillian extension fields. InContributions to Algebra, Bass, Cassidy, Kovacic eds., Academic Press, New York, 1977, pp. 329–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nishioka, K., Nishioka, K. Algebraic independence of elementary functions and its application to Masser's vanishing theorem. Aeq. Math. 40, 67–77 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02112281

AMS (1980) subject classification

Navigation