Skip to main content
Log in

Chapter 13 Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints

  • Part IV Statistical And Stochastic Characterizations
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) models and concepts are formulated here in terms of the “P-Models” of Chance Constrained Programming, which are then modified to contact the “satisficing concepts” of H.A. Simon. Satisficing is thereby added as a third category to the efficiency/inefficiency dichotomies that have heretofore prevailed in DEA. Formulations include cases in which inputs and outputs are stochastic, as well as cases in which only the outputs are stochastic. Attention is also devoted to situations in which variations in inputs and outputs are related through a common random variable. Extensions include new developments in goal programming with deterministic equivalents for the corresponding satisficing models under chance constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banker, R.D., Maximum likelihood, consistency and DEA: Statistical foundations, Management Science 39, 1993, 1265–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., Stochastic data envelopment analysis, Working Paper, Carnegie-Mellon University School of Urban and Public Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D. and W.W. Cooper, Validation and generalization of DEA and its uses, TOP 2, 1994, 249–296.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., A. Charnes and W.W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 30, 1984, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, J. Swarts and D.A. Thomas, An introduction to data envelopment analysis with some of its models and their uses, Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting 5, 1989, 125–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints, Operations Research 11, 1963, 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper,Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming, Wiley, New York, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, Goal programming and multiple objective optimizations, European Journal of Operational Research 1, 1977, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper, Preface to topics in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operations Research 2, 1985, 59–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 9, 1962, 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, J.K. DeVoe and D.B. Learner, Demon, Mark II: An extremal equation approach to new product marketing, Management Science 14, 1968, 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and J. Hsu, A chance constrained programming approach to multiple-objective sample designs in auditing, Working Paper, University of Texas Graduate School of Business, Austin, TX, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis to program follow through, Management Science 27, 1981, 668–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 1978, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper and G.H. Symonds, Cost horizons and certainty equivalents: An approach to stochastic programming of heating oil, Management Science 4, 1958, 235–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W.W., Z.M. Huang and S.X. Li, Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA, Journal of Productivity Analysis (submitted, 1996).

  • Cooper, W.W. and Y. Ijiri (eds.),Kohler's Dictionary for Accountants, 6th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, A.A. and A.P. Schinnar, Stochastic data envelopment analysis, Working Paper, The Ohio State University, 1987.

  • Jagannathan, R., Use of sample information in stochastic recourse and chance constrained programming, Management Science 31, 1985, 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, Y., Determination of the product mix and the business policy of an insurance company — a portfolio approach, Management Science 23, 1977, 1060–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K.C., C.A.K. Lovell and S. Thore, Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis, Managerial and Decision Economics 14, 1993, 541–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, K., C.A.K. Lovell and S. Thore, Productive efficiency under capitalism and state socialism: An empirical inquiry using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 46, 1994, 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K., C.A.K. Lovell and S. Thore, Productive efficiency under capitalism and state socialism: The chance-constrained programming approach,Public Finance in a World of Transition, Proceedings of the 47th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance, P. Pestieau, ed., 1992, supplement to Public Finance/Finances Publique 47, 1992, 109–121.

  • Leibenstein, H.,Beyond Economic Man, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, E., Data envelopment analysis and related approaches for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with an spplication to program follow through in U.S. public school education, Ph.D. Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University School of Urban and Public Affairs, Pittsburgh, PA, 1978. Also available from Michigan University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L.M. and R.M. Thrall, Recent developments in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis, Journal of Econometrics 46, 1990, 7–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K., Data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement in the stochastic case, Computers and Operations Research 14, 1987, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K., Data envelopment with maximum correlation, International Journal of Systems Science 20, 1989, 2085–2093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K., Efficiency measurement in stochastic input-output systems, International Journal of Systems Science 13, 1982, 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, J.K., Robust efficiency measures in a stochastic efficiency, International Journal of Systems Science 19, 1988, 779–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F., A simplified model for portfolio analysis, Management Science 9, 1963, 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.,Models of Man, Wiley, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedry, A.C.,Budget Control and Cost Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J., The Xistence of X-efficiency, American Economic Review 66, 1976, 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H.M.,Principles of Operations Research, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z. & Li, S.X. Chapter 13 Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Ann Oper Res 66, 279–295 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02187302

Keywords

Navigation