Skip to main content
Log in

Absence of phase transition for antiferromagnetic Potts models via the Dobrushin uniqueness theorem

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove that theq-state Potts antiferromagnet on a lattice of maximum coordination numberr exhibits exponential decay of correlations uniformly at all temperatures (including zero temperature) wheneverq>2r. We also prove slightly better bounds for several two-dimensional lattices: square lattice (exponential decay forq≥7), triangular lattice (q≥11), hexagonal lattice (q≥4), and Kagomé lattice (q≥6). The proofs are based on the Dobrushin uniqueness theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. L. Dobrushin,Theor. Prob. Appl. 13:197 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. L. Dobrushin,Theor. Prob. Appl. 15:458 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.-O. Georgii,Gibbs Measures and Phase Transitions (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Simon,The Statistical Mechanics of Lattice Gases (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. B. Potts,Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 48:106 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Y. Wu,Rev. Mod. Phys. 54:235 (1982);55:315 (E) (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Y. Wu,J. Appl. Phys. 55:2421 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Stephenson,J. Math. Phys. 5:1009 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. I. Syozi, InPhase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 1, C. Domb and M. S. Green, eds. (Academic Press, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. J. Baxter,Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics (Academic Press, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. J. Baxter,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 383:43 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Onsager,Phys. Rev. 65:117 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Lenard, Cited in E. H. Lieb,Phys. Rev. 162:162 (1967), pp. 169–170.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. Baxter,J. Math. Phys. 11:3116 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. T. Truong and K. D. Schotte,J. Phys. A 19:1477 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. A. Pearce and K. A. Seaton,Ann. Phys. 193:326 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Kim and P. A. Pearce,J. Phys. A 22:1439 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. L. Henley, In preparation; J. K. Burton and C. L. Henley, In preparation.

  19. S. J. Ferreira and A. D. Sokal,Phys. Rev. B 51:6727 (1995); and in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Saleur,Commun. Math. Phys. 132:657 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Saleur,Nucl. Phys. B 360:219 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. J. Baxter, H. N. V. Temperley and S. E. Ashley,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 358:535 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. J. Baxter,J. Phys. A 19:2821 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Baxter,J. Phys. A 20:5241 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. J. Baxter,J. Math. Phys. 11:784 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. van Enter, R. Fernández, and A. D. Sokal, Unpublished.

  27. J. Adler, A. Brandt, W. Janke, and S. Shmulyan,J. Phys. A 28:5117 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. W. Kasteleyn and C. M. Fortuin,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 26 (Suppl.):11 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. M. Fortuin and P. W. Kasteleyn,Physica 57:536 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. M. Fortuin,Physica 58:393 (1972);59:545 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. Baxter, S. B. Kelland, and F. Y. Wu,J. Phys. A 9:397 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Takano, T. Shinjo, and T. Takada,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 30:1049 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Broholm, G. Aeppli, G. Espinosa, and A. S. Cooper,J. Appl. Phys. 69: 4968 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Huse and A. D. Rutemberg,Phys. Rev. B 45:7536 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Kondev and C. L. Henley,Nucl. Phys. B 464:540 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. C. D. van Enter, R. Fernández, and A. D. Sokal,J. Stat. Phys. 72:879 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. Preston,Random Fields (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. L. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman, Constructive criterion for the uniqueness of the Gibbs field, inStatistical Physics and Dynamical Systems, J. Fritz, A. Jaffe, and D. Szász, eds. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. L. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman, Completely analytical Gibbs fields, inStatistical Physics and Dynamical Systems, J. Fritz, A. Jaffe, and D. Szász, eds. (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  40. R. L. Dobrushin and S. B. Shlosman,J. Stat. Phys. 46:983 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. C. Radulescu and D. F. Styer,J. Stat. Phys. 49:281 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  42. K. Haller and T. Kennedy, Absence of renormalization group pathologies near the critical temperature—Two examples, University of Arizona preprint [mp-arc/95-505].

  43. M. R. Jerrum,Random Structures and Algorithms 7:157 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salas, J., Sokal, A.D. Absence of phase transition for antiferromagnetic Potts models via the Dobrushin uniqueness theorem. J Stat Phys 86, 551–579 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199113

Key Words

Navigation