Skip to main content
Log in

Minimum concave-cost network flow problems: Applications, complexity, and algorithms

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss a wide range of results for minimum concave-cost network flow problems, including related applications, complexity issues, and solution techniques. Applications from production and inventory planning, and transportation and communication network design are discussed. New complexity results are proved which show that this problem is NP-hard for cases with cost functions other than fixed charge. An overview of solution techniques for this problem is presented, with some new results given regarding the implementation of a particular branch-and-bound approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Akinc and B.M. Khumawala, An efficient branch and bound algorithm for the capacitated warehouse location problem, Management Sci. 23 (1977) 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Balakrishnan and S.C. Graves, A composite algorithm for a concave-cost network flow problem, Networks 19 (1989) 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.L. Balinski, Fixed cost transportation problems, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 8 (1961) 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.L. Balinski and R.E. Quandt, On an integer program for a delivery problem. Oper. Res. 12 (1964) 300–304.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.S. Barr, F. Glover and D. Klingman, A new optimization method for large scale fixed charge transportation problems. Oper. Res. 29 (1981) 448–463.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.J. Baumol and P. Wolfe, A warehouse-location problem Oper. Res. 6 (1958) 252–263.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Baybars and R.H. Edahl, A heuristic method for facility planning in telecommunications networks with multiple alternate routes, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 35 (1988) 503–528.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.P. Bertsekas and J.N. Tsitsiklis,Parallel and Distributed Computation (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.L. Bhatia, Indefinite quadratic solid transportation problem, J. Inform. Optimiz. Sci. 2 (1981) 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.T. Bornstein and R. Rust, Minimizing a sum of staircase functions under linear constraints, Optimization 19 (1988) 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V.P. Bulatov, The immersion method for the global minimization of functions on the convex polyhedra,Int. Symp. on Engineering, Mathematics, and Applications, Beijing, PR China (July 1988) pp. 335–338.

  12. A.V. Cabot and S.S. Erenguc, Some branch-and-bound procedures for fixed-cost transportation problems, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 31 (1984) 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Cooper and C. Drebes, An approximate solution method for the fixed-charge problem. Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 14 (1968) 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G. Daeninck and Y. Smeers, Using shortest paths in some transshipment problems with concave costs, Math. Programming (1977) 18–25.

  15. G.B. Dantzig,Linear Programming and Extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.S. Davis and T.L. Ray, A branch-and-bound algorithm for the capacitated facilities locations problem, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 16 (1969) 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D.R. Denzler, An approximate algorithm for the fixed charge problems, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 16 (1969) 411–416.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Driebeek, An algorithm for the solution of mixed integer programming problems. Management Sci. 12 (1966) 576–587.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.A. Efroymson and T.L. Ray, A branch-and-bound algorithm for plant location. Oper. Res. 14 (1966) 361–368.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.G. Eggleston,Convexity, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics No. 47 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.E. Erickson, C.L. Monma and A.F. Veinott, Jr., Send-and-split method for minimum-con-cave-cost network flows, Math. Oper. Res. 12 (1987) 634–664.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Erlenkotter, Two producing areas—dynamic programming solutions, in:Investment for Capacity Expansion: Size, Location and Time Phasing, ed. A.S. Manne (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967) pp. 210–227.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.E. Falk and R.M. Soland, An algorithm for separable nonconvex programming problems. Management Sci. 15 (1969) 550–569.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Florian, An introduction to network models used in transportation planning,Transportation Planning Models (Elsevier, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Florian, Nonlinear cost network models in transportation analysis, Math. Programming Study 26 (1986) 167–196.

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Florian and M. Klein, Deterministic production planning with concave costs and capacity constraints. Management Sci. 18 (1971) 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. Florian, J.K. Lenstra and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan. Deterministic production planning: algorithms and complexity, Management Sci. 26 (1980) 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Florian and P. Robillard, An implicit enumeration algorithm for the concave cost network flow problem, Management Sci. 18 (1971) 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Florian, M. Rossin-Arthiat, and D. de Werra, A property of minimum concave cost flows in capacitated networks, Can. J. Oper. Res. 9 (1971) 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  30. C.O. Fong and M.R. Rao, Capacity expansion with two producing regions and concave costs, Management Sci. 22 (1975) 331–339.

    Google Scholar 

  31. L.R. Ford, jr. and D.R. Fulkerson,Flows in Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Gallo, C. Sandi and C. Sodini, An algorithm for the min concave-cost flow problem, Europ. J. Oper. Res. 4 (1980) 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G. Gallo and C. Sodini, Adjacent extreme flows and application to min concave-cost flow problems. Networks 9 (1979) 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  34. M.R. Garey and D.S. Johnson,Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  35. S.C. Graves and J.B. Orlin, A minimum concave-cost dynamic network flow problem with an application to lot-sizing. Networks, 15 (1985) 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  36. P. Gray, Exact solution of the site selection problem by mixed integer programming, in:Applications of Mathematical Programming Techniques, ed. E.M.L. Beale (The English Universities Press, London, 1970) pp. 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. Gray, Exact solution of the fixed-charge transportation problem. Oper. Res. 19 (1971) 1529–1538.

    Google Scholar 

  38. G.M. Guisewite and P.M. Pardalos, Algorithms for the uncapacitated single-source minimum concave-cost network flow problem, Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Pennsylvania State University (1990).

  39. K.B. Haley, The solid transportation problem, Oper. Res. Quarterly 10 (1962) 448–463.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R.W. Hall, Graphical interpretation of the transportation problem, Transportation Sci. 23 (1988) 37–45.

    Google Scholar 

  41. G.L. Hefley and B.O. Barr, Fixed charge transportation problem: a survey, presented to the 43rd ORSA National Meeting in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (May 1973).

  42. D.S. Hochbaum and A. Segev. Analysis of a flow problem with fixed charges. Networks 19 (1989) 291–312.

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. Horst and H. Tuy,Global Optimization: Deterministic Approaches. (Springer, 1989) to be published.

  44. T. Ibaraki and N. Katoh,Resource Allocation Problems, Algorithmic Approaches (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA., 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  45. J.J. Jarvis, V.E. Unger, R.L. Rardin and R.W. Moore, Optimal design of regional wastewater systems: a fixed charge network flow model. Oper. Res. 26 (1978) 538–550.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. Jogannathan and M.R. Rao, A class of deterministic production planning models, Management Sci. 19 (1973) 1295–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  47. L.A. Johnson and D.C. Montgomery,Operations Research in Production Planning, Scheduling, and Inventory Control. (Wiley, New York, 1974) pp. 212–224.

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. Kennedy, Some branch-and-bound techniques for nonlinear optimization, Math. Programming 42 (1988) 147–169.

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Kennington, The fixed-charge transportation problem: a computational study with a branch-and-bound code. AIIE Trans. 8 (1976) 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Kennington and E. Unger, The group-theoretic structure in the fixed-charge transportation problem. Oper. Res. 21 (1973) 1142–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Kennington and E. Unger, A new branch-and-bound algorithm for the fixed-charge transportation algorithm. Management Sci. 22 (1976) 1116–1126.

    Google Scholar 

  52. B.M. Khumawala, An efficient branch-and-bound algorithm for the warehouse location problem. Management Sci. 18 (1972) B718-B731.

    Google Scholar 

  53. D. Klingman, P.H. Randolph and S.W. Fuller, A cotton ginning problem, Oper. Res. 24 (1976) 700–717.

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Konno, Minimum concave series production system with deterministic demands: a backlogging case. J. Oper. Res. Soc. Jpn. 16 (1973) 246–253.

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Konno, Minimum concave cost production system: multi-echelon model. Math. Programming 41 (1988) 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  56. H.W. Kuhn and W.J. Baumol, An approximate algorithm for the fixed-charge transportation problem, Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 9 (1962) 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  57. B. Lamar, An improved branch-and-bound algorithm for minimum concave cost network flow problems, Working Paper, Graduate School of Management and Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  58. L. LeBlanc, Global solutions for a non-convex, non-concave rail network model, Math. Sci. 23 (1978) 131–139.

    Google Scholar 

  59. S. Lee and P.H. Zipkin, A dynamic lot-size model with make-or-buy decisions. Management Sci. 35 (1989) 447–458.

    Google Scholar 

  60. N. Linial, Hard enumeration problems in geometry and combinatorics, SIAM J. Alg. Discr. Meth. 7 (1986) 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  61. L.S. Linn and J. Allen, Minplex — a compactor that minimizes the bounding rectangle and individual rectangles in a layout,23rd Design Automation Conf. (1986) pp. 123–129.

  62. S.A. Lippman, Optimal inventory policy with multiple setup costs. Management Sci. 16 (1969) 118–138.

    Google Scholar 

  63. S.F. Love, A facilities in series inventory model with nested schedules. Management Sci. 18 (1972) 327–338.

    Google Scholar 

  64. S.F. Love, Bounded production and inventory models with piecewise concave costs, Management Sci. 20 (1973) 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  65. D.D. Lozovanu, Properties of optimal solutions of a grid transport problem with concave function of the flows on the arcs. Engineering Cybernetics 20 (1983) 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  66. T.L. Magnanti and R.T. Wong. Network design and transportation planning: models and algorithms, Transportation Sci. 18 (1984) 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  67. A.S. Manne and A.F. Veinott, Jr., Optimal plant size with arbitrary increasing time paths of demand, in:Investments for Capacity Expansion: Size, Location and Time Phasing, ed. A.S. Manne (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1967) pp. 178–190.

    Google Scholar 

  68. P. McKeown, A vertex ranking procedure for solving the linear fixed-charge problem Oper. Res. 23 (1975) 1183–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  69. K.G. Murty, Solving the fixed charge problem by ranking the extreme points. Oper. Res. 16 (1968) 268–279.

    Google Scholar 

  70. K.G. Murty and S.N. Kabadi, Some NP-complete problems in quadratic and non-linear programming. Math. Programming 39 (1987) 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  71. P.M. Pardalos, Enumerative techniques for solving some nonconvex global optimization problems. OR Spectrum 10 (1988) 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  72. P.M. Pardalos, J.H. Glick and J.B. Rosen, Global minimization of indefinite quadratic problems, Computing 39 (1987) 281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  73. P.M. Pardalos, A.T. Phillips and J.B. Rosen,Parallel Computing in Mathematical Programming, (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990) to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  74. P.M. Pardalos and J.B. Rosen, Global minimization of large-scale constrained concave quadratic problems by separable programming, Math. Programming 34 (1986) 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  75. P.M. Pardalos and J.B. Rosen. Global concave minimization: a bibliographic survey. SIAM Rev. 28 (1986) 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  76. P.M. Pardalos and J.B. Rosen.Constrained Global Optimization: Algorithms and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 268 (Springer, Berlin, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  77. P.M. Pardalos and G. Schnitger, Checking local optimality in constrained quadratic programming is NP-hard, Oper. Res. Lett. 7 (1988) 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  78. A.T. Phillips, Parallel algorithms for constrained optimization, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota (1988).

  79. A.T. Phillips and J.B. Rosen, A parallel algorithm for constrained concave quadratic global minimization. Math. Programming 42 (1988) 421–448.

    Google Scholar 

  80. J. Plasil and P. Chlebnican, A new algorithm for the concave cost flow problem, Working Paper, Technical University of Transport and Communications. Zilina, Czechoslovakia (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  81. R. Polyak, On a nonconvex problem, Sov. Math. Doklady 17a (1968) 786–789.

    Google Scholar 

  82. P. Rech and L.G. Barton, A non-convex transportation algorithm, in:Applications of Mathematical Programming Techniques, ed. E.M.L. Beale (The English Universities Press, London, 1970) pp. 250–260.

    Google Scholar 

  83. C. Revelle, D. Marks and J.C. Liebman, An analysis of private and public sector location models, Management Sci. 16 (1970) 692–707.

    Google Scholar 

  84. J.B. Rosen, Global minimization of a linearly constrained concave function by partition of feasible domain. Math. Oper. Res. 8 (1983) 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  85. M.J. Sobel, Smoothing start-up and shut-down costs: concave case, Management Sci. 17 (1970) 78–91.

    Google Scholar 

  86. R.M. Soland, Optimal facility location with concave costs. Oper. Res. 22 (1974) 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  87. K. Spielberg. An algorithm for the simple plant location problem with some side conditions, Oper. Res. 17 (1969) 85–111.

    Google Scholar 

  88. K. Spielberg, Plant location with generalized search origin. Management Sci. 16 (1969) 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  89. K. Spielberg, On solving plant location problems, in:Applications of Mathematical Programming Techniques, ed. E.M.L. Beale (The English Universities Press, London, 1970) pp. 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  90. J.W. Stroup, Allocation of launch vehicles to space missions: a fixed-cost transportation problem. Oper. Res. 15 (1967) 1157–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  91. C. Swoveland, A deterministic multi-period production planning model with piecewise concave production and holding-backorder costs. Management Sci. 21 (1975) 1007–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  92. H.A. Taha, Concave minimization over a convex polyhedron. Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 20 (1973) 533–548.

    Google Scholar 

  93. P.T. Thach, An efficient method for min concave cost flow problems under circuitless single-source uncapacitated networks, Technical Report. Technical University of Graz. Austria (1989).

  94. N.V. Thoai and H. Tuy. Convergent algorithms for minimizing a concave function. Math. Oper. Res. 5 (1980) 556–566.

    Google Scholar 

  95. J.A. Tomlin, Minimum-cost multicommodity network flows. Oper. Res. 14 (1966) 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  96. H. Tuy, Concave-programming under linear constraints. Sov. Math. Doklady (1964) 1437–1440.

  97. A.F. Veinott, Jr., Minimum concave-cost solution of Leontief substitution models of multifacility inventory systems. Oper. Res. 17 (1969) 262–291.

    Google Scholar 

  98. H.M. Wagner, On a class of capacitated transportation problems, Management. Sci. 5 (1959) 304–318.

    Google Scholar 

  99. H.M. Wagner, A postscript to: Dynamic problems in the theory of the firm. Naval Res. Logistics Quarterly 7 (1960) 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  100. H.M. Wagner and T.M. Whitin, Dynamic version of the economic lot size model, Management Sci. 5 (1958) 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  101. W.E. Walker, A heuristic adjacent extreme point algorithm for the fixed charge problem, Management Sci. 22 (1976) 587–596.

    Google Scholar 

  102. B. Yaged, Jr., Minimum cost routing for static network models, Networks 1 (1971) 139–172.

    Google Scholar 

  103. N. Zadeh, On building minimum cost communication networks. Networks 3 (1973) 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  104. N. Zadeh, On building minimum cost communication networks over time, Networks 4 (1974) 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  105. W.I. Zangwill, A deterministic multi-period production scheduling model with backlogging, Management Sci. 13 (1966) 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  106. W.I. Zangwill, Production smoothing of economic lot sizes with non-decreasing requirements. Management Sci. 13 (1966) 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  107. W.I. Zangwill, Minimum concave-cost flows in certain networks Management Sci. 14 (1968) 429–450.

    Google Scholar 

  108. W.I. Zangwill, A backlogging model and a multi-echelon model of an economic lot size production system — a network approach, Management Sci. 15 (1969) 506–527.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guisewite, G.M., Pardalos, P.M. Minimum concave-cost network flow problems: Applications, complexity, and algorithms. Ann Oper Res 25, 75–99 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283688

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02283688

Keywords

Navigation