Abstract
We continue our research on the relative strength ofL-like combinatorial principles for successors of singular cardinals. In [3] we have shown that the existence of a λ+-special Aronszajn tree does not follow from that of a λ+-Souslin tree. It follows from [5], [4] and [6] that under G.C.H. □λ does imply the existence of a λ+-Souslin tree. In [2] we show that □λ does not follow from the existence of a λ+-special Aronszajn tree. Here we show that the existence of such a tree implies that of an ‘almost Souslin’ λ+-tree. It follows that the statement “All λ+-Aronszajn trees are special” implies that there are no λ+-Aronszajn trees.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U. Avraham, S. Shelah and R. Solovay,Squares with diamonds and Souslin trees with special squares, Fund. Math., to appear.
S. Ben-David and M. Magidor,The weak □*is really weaker than the full □, J. Symbolic Logic, to appear.
S. Ben-David and S. Shelah,Souslin trees on successors of singular cardinals, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, to appear.
J. Gregory,Higher Souslin trees and the G.C.H. J. Symbolic Logic41 (1976), 663–671.
R. Jensen,The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy. Ann. Math. Logic4 (1972), 229–308.
S. Shelah,On successors of singular cardinals, inLogic Colloquium 1978 (N. Boffa, D. Van Dallon, K. Malloon eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 357–380.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ben-David, S., Shelah, S. Non-special Aronszajn trees on ℵω+1 . Israel J. Math. 53, 93–96 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772672
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772672