Skip to main content
Log in

Amenability, Kazhdan’s property and percolation for trees, groups and equivalence relations

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove amenability for a broad class of equivalence relations which have trees associated to the equivalence classes. The proof makes crucial use of percolation on trees. We also discuss related concepts and results, including amenability of automorphism groups. A second main result is that no discrete subgroup of the automorphism group of a tree is isomorphic to the fundamental group of any closed manifoldM admitting a nontrivial connection-preserving, volume-preserving action of a noncompact, simply connected, almost simple Lie group having Kazhdan’s property (T). The technique of proof also shows that M does not admit a hyperbolic structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scot Adams,Trees and amenable equivalence relations, Ergodic Theory & Dynamical Systems10 (1990), 1–14.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Scot Adams and R. Spatzier,Kazhdan groups, cocycles and trees, Am. J. Math.112 (1990), 271–287.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Connes, J. Feldman and B. Weiss,An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation, Ergodic Theory & Dynamical Systems1 (1981), 431–450.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Claude Dellacherie and Paul-André Meyer,Probabilities and Potential, Vol. C, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Randall Dougherty and Alexander S. Kechris,Some remarks on trees and amenable equivalence relations, unpublished notes, 1988.

  6. J. Faraut and K. Harzallah,Distances Hilbertiennes invariantes sur un espace homogène, Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble24 (1974), 171–217.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacob Feldman and Calvin C. Moore,Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology, and von Neumann algebras, I, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.234 (1977), 289–324.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. F.P. Greenleaf,Amenable actions of locally compact groups, J. Functional Analysis4 (1969), 295–315.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Geoffrey Grimmett,Percolation, Springer, New York, 1989.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gromov,Rigid transformation groups, inGéometrie Differentielle (D. Bernard and Y. Choquet-Bruhat, eds.), Hermann, Paris, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander S. Kechris,Amenable equivalence relations and Turing degrees, J. Symb. Logic56 (1991), 182–194.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Harry Kesten,Full Banach mean-values on countable groups, Math. Scand.7 (1959), 146–156.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Harry Kesten,Symmetric random walks on groups, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.92 (1959), 336–354.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell Lyons,Random walks and percolation on trees, Ann. Prob.18 (1990), 931–958.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Russell LyonsThe Ising model and percolation on trees and tree-like graphs, Commun. Math. Phys.125 (1989), 337–353.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell Lyons,Random walks, capacity, and percolation on trees, Ann. Prob., to appear.

  17. Russell Lyons and Robin Pemantle,Random walk in a random environment and first-passage percolation on trees, Ann. Prob., to appear.

  18. Paul-André Meyer,Limites médiales, d’après Mokobodzki, Séminaire de Probabilités VII, Université de Strasbourg, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 321, Springer, Berlin, 1973, pp. 198–204.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yiannis N. Moschovakis,Descriptive Set Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Claudio Nebbia,Amenability and Kunze-Stein property for groups acting on a tree, Pacific J. Math.135 (1988), 371–380.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Alan L.T. Paterson,Amenability, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Halsey L. Royden,Real Analysis, third ed., Macmillan, New York, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. J.-P. Serre,Trees, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Spatzier and R. Zimmer,Fundamental groups of negatively curved manifolds and actions of semisimple groups, Topology, to appear.

  25. Y. Watatani,Property (T) of Kazhdan implies property (FA) of Serre, Math. Japon.27 (1981), 97–103.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolfgang Woess,Amenable group actions on infinite graphs, Math. Ann.284 (1989), 251–265.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Robert J. Zimmer,Hyperfinite factors and amenable ergodic actions, Invent. Math.41 (1977), 23–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Robert J. Zimmer,Amenable ergodic groups actions and an application to Poisson boundaries of random walks, J. Functional Analysis27 (1978), 350–372.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Robert J. Zimmer,Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Robert J. Zimmer,Representations of fundamental groups of manifolds with a semisimple transformation group, J. Am. Math. Soc.2 (1989), 201–213.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Robert J. Zimmer,Kazhdan groups acting on compact manifolds, Invent. Math.75 (1984), 425–436.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research of both authors was supported by NSF Postdoctoral Fellowships. The second author was also supported by an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, S., Lyons, R. Amenability, Kazhdan’s property and percolation for trees, groups and equivalence relations. Israel J. Math. 75, 341–370 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02776032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02776032

Keywords

Navigation