Abstract
We present an ordinal rank, δ3, which refines the standard classification of non-convexity among closed planar sets. The class of closed planar sets falls into a hierarchy of order type ω1 + 1 when ordered by δ-rank.
The rank δ3 (S) of a setS is defined by means of topological complexity of 3-cliques in the set. A 3-clique in a setS is a subset ofS all of whose unordered 3-tuples fail to have their convex hull inS. Similarly, δn (S) is defined for alln>1.
The classification cannot be done using δ2, which considers only 2-cliques (known in the literature also as “visually independent subsets”), and in dimension 3 or higher the analogous classification is not valid.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Breen,An R d analogue of Valentine’s theorem on 3-convex sets, Israel Journal of Mathematics24 (1976), 206–210.
M. Breen,A decomposition theorem for m-convex sets, Israel Journal of Mathematics24 (1976), 211–216.
M. Breen and D. C. Kay,General decomposition theorems for m-convex sets in the plane, Israel Journal of Mathematics24 (1976), 217–233.
H. G. Eggleston,A condition for a compact plane set to be a union of finitely many convex sets, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society76 (1974), 61–66.
M. Kojman,Classifying non-convexity in higher dimensions, Fundamenta Mathematicae, in press.
M. Kojman, M. A. Perles, and S. Shelah,Sets in a Euclidean space which are not a countable union of convex subsets, Israel Journal of Mathematics70 (1990), 313–342.
J. Matoušek and P. Valtr,On visibility and covering by convex sets, Israel Journal of Mathematics113 (1999), 341–379.
M. A. Perles and S. Shelah,A closed (n+1)-convex set in R 2 is the union of n 6 convex sets, Israel Journal of Mathematics70 (1990), 305–312.
F. A. Valentine,A three point convexity property, Pacific Journal of Mathematics7 (1957), 1227–1235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kojman, M. Cantor-Bendixson degrees and convexity in ℝ2 . Isr. J. Math. 121, 85–91 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802497
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802497