Skip to main content
Log in

Can Two Wrongs Make a Right? Coin-Tossing Games and Parrondo’s Paradox

  • Article
  • Published:
The Mathematical Intelligencer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Doering, C.R. Randomly rattled ratchets,Nuovo Cim. D17 (1995), 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harmer, G.P., Abbot, D. Losing strategies can win by Parrondo’s paradox,Nature 402 (1999), 864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harmer, G.P., Abbot, D. Parrondo’s paradox.Statistical Science,14(1999), 206–213.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Harmer, G.P., Abbot, D., and Taylor, P.G. The paradox of Parrondo’s games.Proc. Ft. Soc. Lond. A 456 (2000), 247–259.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Klarreich, E. Playing Both Sides,The Sciences (2001), 25–29.

  6. Parrondo, J.M.R., Harmer, G.P., Abbot, D. New paradoxical games based on Brownian ratchets,Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 5226–5229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saari, D.Decisions and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2001).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Simpson, E.H. The Interpretation of Interaction in Contingency Tables,J. Roy. Stat Soc. B13 (1951), 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Takàcs, L.Stochastic processes. Methuen’s Monographs on Applied Probability and Statistics (1960).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Percus, O.E., Percus, J.K. Can Two Wrongs Make a Right? Coin-Tossing Games and Parrondo’s Paradox. The Mathematical Intelligencer 24, 68–72 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024736

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03024736

Keywords

Navigation