Skip to main content
Log in

Valuation of power plants by utility indifference and numerical computation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a real option valuation model of a power plant, which accounts for physical constraints and market incompleteness. Switching costs, minimum on-off times, ramp rates, or non-constant heat rates are important characteristics that can lead, if neglected, to overestimated values. The existence of non-hedgeable uncertainties is also a feature of energy markets that can impact assets value. We use the utility indifference approach to define the value of the physical asset. We derive the associated mixed optimal switching-control problem and provide a characterization of its solution by means of a coupled system of reflected Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (BSDE). We relate this system to a system of variational inequalities, and we provide a numerical comparative study by implementing BSDE simulation algorithms, and PDE finite differences schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bally V, Pagès G, Printemps J (2005) A quantization tree method for pricing and hedging multidimensional american options. Math Finan 15(1): 119–168

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard B, Touzi N (2005) Discrete time approximation and monte-carlo simulation of backward stochastic differential equations. Stoch Process Appl 111:175–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Briand P, Hu Y (2005) BSDE with quadratic growth and unbounded terminal value. Preprint

  • Carmona R, Ludkovski M (2006) Optimal switching with applications to energy tolling agreements. Preprint

  • Carrière J (1996) Valuation of early-exercise price of options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Math Econ 19(1): 19–30

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chaumont S, Imkeller P, Müller M (2005) Equilibrium trading of climate and weather risk and numerical simulation in a markovian framework. Preprint

  • Clewlow L, Strickland C (1999) Valuing energy options in a one factor model fitted to forward prices. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=160608

  • Clewlow L, Strickland C (2000) Energy derivatives: pricing and risk managemen. Lacima Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Delarue F, Menozzi S (2006) A forward-backward stochastic algorithm for quasi-linear PDEs. Ann Appl Probab 16: 140–184

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deng S, Oren S (2003) Incorporating operational characteristics and startup costs in option-based valuation of power generation capacity. Probab Eng Inform Sci 17(2): 155–181

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Djehiche B, Hamadène S, Popier A (2007) A finite horizon optimal multiple switching problem. Preprint

  • El Karoui N, Kapoudjian C, Pardoux E, Peng S, Quenez M (1997) Reflected solutions of backward sde’s and related obstacle problems for PDE’s. Ann Probab 25(2): 558–602

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • El Karoui N, Peng S, Quenez M (1997) Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math Finan 7(1): 1–71

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • El Karoui N, Rouge R (2000) Pricing via utility maximization and entropy. Math Finan 10(2): 259–276

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner D, Zhuang Y (2000) Valuation of power generation assets: a real options approach. Algo Res Q 3(3): 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman H (2005) Commodities and commodity derivatives: modelling and pricing for agriculturals, metals and energy. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobet E, Lemor J, Warin X (2004) A regression-based monte-carlo method to solve backward stochastic differential equations. Ann Appl Probab 15(3): 2172–2202

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hamadène S, Jeanblanc M (2007) On the starting and stopping problem: application in reversible investments. Math Oper Res 32(1): 182–192

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hamadène S, Hdhiri I (2005) On the stopping and starting problem with a Brownian and an independent Poisson noise. Preprint, Université du Maine

  • Hdhiri I (2006) Equations différentielles stochastiques rétrogrades et applications. Ph.D. thesis, Université du Maine

  • Henderson V, Hobson D: Utility indifference pricing—an overview (2004). Preprint. http://www.orfe.princeton.edu/~vhenders/Indifference_survey.pdf

  • Hobson D: Real options, non-traded assets and utility indifference prices. citeseer.ist.psu.edu/hobson03real.html

  • Hu Y, Imkeller P, Müller M (2005) Utility maximization in incomplete markets. Ann Appl Probab 15(3): 1691–1712

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kobylanski M (2000) Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth. Ann Probab 28: 558–602

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kobylanski M, Lepeltier J, Quenez M, Torres S (2002) Reflected backward SDE with super-linear quadratic coefficient. Probab Math Stat 22(1): 51–83

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff F, Schwartz E (2001) Valuing american options by simulation: a simple least squares approach. Rev Finan Stud 14: 113–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludkovski M (2005) Optimal switching with applications to energy tolling agreements. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University

  • Mania M, Schweizer M (2005) Dynamic exponential utility indifference valuation. Ann Appl Probab 15(3): 2113–2143

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peng S (1997) Backward sde and related g-expectation. Pitman Res Notes Math 364: 141–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng S (2004) Nonlinear expectations, nonlinear evaluations and risk measures. Stoch Methods Finan 1856: 165–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng S, Xu M (2005) The numerical algorithms and simulations for BSDEs. Preprint

  • Pham H, Vath V, Zhou X (2007) Optimal stopping over multiple regimes. Preprint

  • Schwartz E, Trigeorgis L (2004) Real options and investment under uncertainty: classical readings and recent contributions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Skantze P, Ilic M (2000) The joint dynamics of electricity spot and forward markets: implications on formulating dynamic hedging strategies. Energy Laboratory Publication, ♯ MIT EL 00-005. MIT, Cambridge

  • Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng C, Barz G (2002) Short-term generation asset valuation. Oper Res 50(2): 297–310

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnaud Porchet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porchet, A., Touzi, N. & Warin, X. Valuation of power plants by utility indifference and numerical computation. Math Meth Oper Res 70, 47–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0231-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0231-z

Keywords

Navigation