Abstract
This paper presents a real option valuation model of a power plant, which accounts for physical constraints and market incompleteness. Switching costs, minimum on-off times, ramp rates, or non-constant heat rates are important characteristics that can lead, if neglected, to overestimated values. The existence of non-hedgeable uncertainties is also a feature of energy markets that can impact assets value. We use the utility indifference approach to define the value of the physical asset. We derive the associated mixed optimal switching-control problem and provide a characterization of its solution by means of a coupled system of reflected Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (BSDE). We relate this system to a system of variational inequalities, and we provide a numerical comparative study by implementing BSDE simulation algorithms, and PDE finite differences schemes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bally V, Pagès G, Printemps J (2005) A quantization tree method for pricing and hedging multidimensional american options. Math Finan 15(1): 119–168
Bouchard B, Touzi N (2005) Discrete time approximation and monte-carlo simulation of backward stochastic differential equations. Stoch Process Appl 111:175–206
Briand P, Hu Y (2005) BSDE with quadratic growth and unbounded terminal value. Preprint
Carmona R, Ludkovski M (2006) Optimal switching with applications to energy tolling agreements. Preprint
Carrière J (1996) Valuation of early-exercise price of options using simulations and nonparametric regression. Math Econ 19(1): 19–30
Chaumont S, Imkeller P, Müller M (2005) Equilibrium trading of climate and weather risk and numerical simulation in a markovian framework. Preprint
Clewlow L, Strickland C (1999) Valuing energy options in a one factor model fitted to forward prices. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=160608
Clewlow L, Strickland C (2000) Energy derivatives: pricing and risk managemen. Lacima Publications, London
Delarue F, Menozzi S (2006) A forward-backward stochastic algorithm for quasi-linear PDEs. Ann Appl Probab 16: 140–184
Deng S, Oren S (2003) Incorporating operational characteristics and startup costs in option-based valuation of power generation capacity. Probab Eng Inform Sci 17(2): 155–181
Dixit A, Pindyck R (1994) Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Djehiche B, Hamadène S, Popier A (2007) A finite horizon optimal multiple switching problem. Preprint
El Karoui N, Kapoudjian C, Pardoux E, Peng S, Quenez M (1997) Reflected solutions of backward sde’s and related obstacle problems for PDE’s. Ann Probab 25(2): 558–602
El Karoui N, Peng S, Quenez M (1997) Backward stochastic differential equations in finance. Math Finan 7(1): 1–71
El Karoui N, Rouge R (2000) Pricing via utility maximization and entropy. Math Finan 10(2): 259–276
Gardner D, Zhuang Y (2000) Valuation of power generation assets: a real options approach. Algo Res Q 3(3): 9–20
Geman H (2005) Commodities and commodity derivatives: modelling and pricing for agriculturals, metals and energy. Wiley, New York
Gobet E, Lemor J, Warin X (2004) A regression-based monte-carlo method to solve backward stochastic differential equations. Ann Appl Probab 15(3): 2172–2202
Hamadène S, Jeanblanc M (2007) On the starting and stopping problem: application in reversible investments. Math Oper Res 32(1): 182–192
Hamadène S, Hdhiri I (2005) On the stopping and starting problem with a Brownian and an independent Poisson noise. Preprint, Université du Maine
Hdhiri I (2006) Equations différentielles stochastiques rétrogrades et applications. Ph.D. thesis, Université du Maine
Henderson V, Hobson D: Utility indifference pricing—an overview (2004). Preprint. http://www.orfe.princeton.edu/~vhenders/Indifference_survey.pdf
Hobson D: Real options, non-traded assets and utility indifference prices. citeseer.ist.psu.edu/hobson03real.html
Hu Y, Imkeller P, Müller M (2005) Utility maximization in incomplete markets. Ann Appl Probab 15(3): 1691–1712
Kobylanski M (2000) Backward stochastic differential equations and partial differential equations with quadratic growth. Ann Probab 28: 558–602
Kobylanski M, Lepeltier J, Quenez M, Torres S (2002) Reflected backward SDE with super-linear quadratic coefficient. Probab Math Stat 22(1): 51–83
Longstaff F, Schwartz E (2001) Valuing american options by simulation: a simple least squares approach. Rev Finan Stud 14: 113–147
Ludkovski M (2005) Optimal switching with applications to energy tolling agreements. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University
Mania M, Schweizer M (2005) Dynamic exponential utility indifference valuation. Ann Appl Probab 15(3): 2113–2143
Peng S (1997) Backward sde and related g-expectation. Pitman Res Notes Math 364: 141–159
Peng S (2004) Nonlinear expectations, nonlinear evaluations and risk measures. Stoch Methods Finan 1856: 165–253
Peng S, Xu M (2005) The numerical algorithms and simulations for BSDEs. Preprint
Pham H, Vath V, Zhou X (2007) Optimal stopping over multiple regimes. Preprint
Schwartz E, Trigeorgis L (2004) Real options and investment under uncertainty: classical readings and recent contributions. MIT Press, Cambridge
Skantze P, Ilic M (2000) The joint dynamics of electricity spot and forward markets: implications on formulating dynamic hedging strategies. Energy Laboratory Publication, ♯ MIT EL 00-005. MIT, Cambridge
Trigeorgis L (1996) Real options. MIT Press, Cambridge
Tseng C, Barz G (2002) Short-term generation asset valuation. Oper Res 50(2): 297–310
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porchet, A., Touzi, N. & Warin, X. Valuation of power plants by utility indifference and numerical computation. Math Meth Oper Res 70, 47–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0231-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-008-0231-z