Skip to main content
Log in

Asymmetric Information in Fads Models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Finance and Stochastics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fads models were introduced by Shiller (Am Econ Rev 71:421–436, 1981) and Summers (J Finance 41:591–601, 1986) as plausible alternatives to the efficient markets/constant expected returns assumptions. Under these models, logarithms of asset prices embody both a martingale component, with permanent shocks, and a stationary component, with temporary shocks. We study a continuous-time version of these models both from the point of view of informed agents, who observe both fundamental and market values, and from that of uninformed agents, who only observe market prices. We specify the asset price in the larger filtration of the informed agent, and then derive its decomposition in the smaller filtration of the uninformed agent using the Hitsuda representation of Gaussian processes. For uninformed agents we obtain a non-Markovian dynamics, which justifies the use of technical analysis in optimal trading strategies. For both types of agents, we solve the problem of maximization of expected logarithmic utility from terminal wealth, and obtain an explicit formula for the additional logarithmic utility of informed agents. Finally, we apply the decomposition result to the problem of testing the presence of fads from market data. An application to the NYSE-AMEX indices from the CRSP database shows that, if the fads component prevails, then the mean-reversion speed must be slow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amendinger J., Imkeller P., Schweizer M. (1998) Additional logarithmic utility of an insider. Stoch Proc Appl 75, 263–286

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baudoin F. (2002) Conditioned stochastic differential equations: theory, examples and application to finance. Stoch Proc Appl 100, 109–145

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell J.Y., Cochrane J.H. (1999) By force of habit: a consumption-based explanation of aggregate stock market behavior. J Polit Econ 107, 205–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheridito P. (2001) Mixed fractional Brownian motion. Bernoulli 7, 913–934

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheridito, P. , Representations of Gaussian measures that are equivalent to Wiener measure. In: Séminaire de Probabilités XXXVII, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 1382, pp. 81–89 Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer

  6. Corcuera J.M., Imkeller P., Kohatsu-Higa A., Nualart D. (2004) Additional utility of insiders with imperfect dynamical information. Finance Stoch 8, 437–450

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunford N., Schwartz J.T. (1988) Linear operators. Part II, Wiley Classics Library. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fama E.F. (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25, 383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goll T., Kallsen J. (2003) A complete explicit solution to the log-optimal portfolio problem. Ann Appl Probab 13, 774–799

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hitsuda M. (1968) Representation of Gaussian processes equivalent to Wiener process. Osaka J Math 5, 299–312

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Karatzas, I., Shreve, S.E. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. In: Graduate texts in mathematics, 2nd edn. vol. 113. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1991

  12. Karatzas I., Lehoczky J.P., Shreve S.E., Xu G.-L. (1991) Martingale and duality methods for utility maximization in an incomplete market. SIAM J Control Optim 29, 702–730

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohatsu-Higa A. (2004) Enlargement of filtrations and models for insider trading. In: Akahori J., Ogawa S.,Watanabe S. (eds). Stochastic processes and applications to mathematical finance. World Scientifc, Singapore, pp. 151–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kramkov D., Schachermayer W. (1999) The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann Appl Probab 9, 904–950

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. LeRoy S.F., Porter R.D. (1981) The present-value relation: tests based on implied variance bounds. Econometrica 49, 555–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pikovsky I., Karatzas I. (1996) Anticipative portfolio optimization. Adv App Probab 28, 1095–1122

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Poterba J.M., Summers L.H. (1988) Mean reversion in stock prices: evidence and implications. J Financ Econ 22, 27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Revuz, D., Yor, M. Continuous martingales and Brownian motion, In: Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, 3rd edn. vol. 293. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1999

  19. Shiller R.J. (1981) Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends. Am Econ Rev 71, 421–436

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shiller R.J., Perron P. (1985) Testing the random walk hypothesis: power versus frequency of observation. Econ Lett 18, 381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smithies F. (1958) Integral equations. In: Cambridge tracts in mathematics and mathematical Physics, vol. 49. Cambridge University Press, New York

  22. Summers L. (1986) Does the stock market rationally reflect fundamental values. J Finance 41, 591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Guasoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guasoni, P. Asymmetric Information in Fads Models. Finance Stochast. 10, 159–177 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-006-0006-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00780-006-0006-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

JEL Classifications

Navigation