Abstract
We discuss the admissible parameter space for some state space models, including the models that underly exponential smoothing methods. We find that the usual parameter restrictions (requiring all smoothing parameters to lie between 0 and 1) do not always lead to stable models. We also find that all seasonal exponential smoothing methods are unstable as the underlying state space models are neither reachable nor observable. This instability does not affect the forecasts, but does corrupt the state estimates. The problem can be overcome with a simple normalizing procedure. Finally we show that the admissible parameter space of a seasonal exponential smoothing model is much larger than that for a basic structural model, leading to better forecasts from the exponential smoothing model when there is a rapidly changing seasonal pattern.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archibald B.C. (1984). Invertible region of Holt–Winters’ model, Working paper 31/1984, School of Business Administration. Halifax, Dalhousie University
Archibald B.C. (1990). Parameter space of the Holt-Winters’ model. International Journal of Forecasting 6, 199–229
Archibald B.C. (1991). Invertible region of damped trend, seasonal, exponential smoothing model, Working paper 10/1991, School of Business Administration. Halifax, Dalhousie University
Hannan E.J., Deistler M. (1988). The statistical theory of linear systems. New York, Wiley
Harvey A.C. (1989). Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Hyndman R.J., Koehler A.B., Ord J.K., Snyder R.D. (2005). Prediction intervals for exponential smoothing state space models. Journal of Forecasting 24, 17–37
Hyndman R.J., Koehler A.B., Snyder R.D., Grose S. (2002). A state space framework for automatic forecasting using exponential smoothing methods. International Journal of Forecasting 18(3): 439–454
Lawton R. (1998). How should additive Holt-Winters’ estimates be corrected?. International Journal of Forecasting 14, 393–403
Makridakis S., Wheelwright S.C., Hyndman R.J. (1998). Forecasting: methods and applications (3rd ed.) New York, Wiley
McClain J.O., Thomas L.J. (1973). Response–variance tradeoffs in adaptive forecasting. Operations Research 21, 554–568
Ord J.K., Koehler A.B., Snyder R.D. (1997). Estimation and prediction for a class of dynamic nonlinear statistical models. Journal of American Statistical Association 92, 1621–1629
Ralston A. (1965). A first course in numerical analysis. New York, McGraw-Hill
Roberts S.A. (1982). A general class of Holt-Winters type forecasting models. Management Science 28(8): 808–820
Snyder R.D., Forbes C.S. (2003). Reconstructing the Kalman filter for stationary and non-stationary time series. Studies in nonlinear dynamics and econometrics 7(2): 1–18
Snyder R.D., Ord J.K., Koehler A.B. (2001). Prediction intervals for ARIMA models. Journal of Business and Economics Statists 19(2): 217–225
Sweet A.L. (1985). Computing the variance of the forecast error for the Holt-Winters seasonal models. Journal of Forecasting 4, 235–243
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Hyndman, R.J., Akram, M. & Archibald, B.C. The admissible parameter space for exponential smoothing models. AISM 60, 407–426 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-006-0109-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10463-006-0109-x