Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of Intelligent Transportation Systems and the associated technologies has increased the need for complex models and algorithms. Namely, real-time information systems, directly influencing transportation demand, must be supported by detailed behavioral models capturing travel and driving decisions. Discrete choice models methodology provide an appropriate framework to capture such behavior. Recently, the Cross-Nested Logit (CNL) model has received quite a bit of attention in the literature to capture decisions such as mode choice, departure time choice and route choice. %The CNL model is an extension of the Nested Logit model, providing %more flexibility at the cost of some complexity in the model formulation. In this paper, we develop on the general formulation of the Cross Nested Logit model proposed by Ben-Akiva and Bierlaire (1999) and based on the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) model. We show that it is equivalent to the formulations byby Papola (2004) and Wen and Koppelman (2001). We also show that the formulations by Small(1987) and Vovsha(1997) are special cases of this formulation. We formally prove that the Cross-Nested Logit model is indeed a member of the GEV models family. In doing so, we clearly distinguish between conditions that are necessary to prove consistency with the GEV theory, from normalization conditions. Finally, we propose to estimate the model with non-linear programming algorithms, instead of heuristics proposed in the literature. In order to make it operational, we provide the first derivatives of the log-likelihood function, which are necessary to such optimization procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbé, E. (2003). “Behavioral Modeling: Generalized Extreme Value for Choice Models.” Diploma Thesis. Institute of Mathematics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland.

  • Abbé, E., M. Bierlaire, and T. Toledo. (2005). “Normalization and Correlation of Generalized Extreme Value Models.” Technical Report, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL).

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and M. Bierlaire. (1999). “Discrete Choice Methods and their Applications to Short-Term Travel Decisions.” In R. Hall (ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science, Kluwer, pp. 5–34.

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and M. Bierlaire. (2003). “Discrete Choice Models with Applications to Departure Time and Route Choice.” In R. Hall (ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science, 2nd edn., Kluwer, pp. 7–37.

  • Ben-Akiva, M., M. Bierlaire, D. Burton, H.N. Koutsopoulos, and R. Mishalani. (2001). “Network State Estimation and Prediction for Real-Time Transportation Management Applications.” Networks and Spatial Economics 1(3/4), 293–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsekas, D.P. (1999). Nonlinear Programming, 2nd edn., Athena Scientific, Belmont.

  • Bhat, C. (1995). “A Heteroscedastic Extreme Value Model of Intercity Travel Mode Choice.” Transportation Research B 29, 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierlaire, M. (1995). “A Robust Algorithm for the Simultaneous Estimation of Hierarchical Logit Models.” GRT Report 95/3, Department of Mathematics, FUNDP.

  • Bierlaire, M. (2003). “BIOGEME: A Free Package for the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models.” Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.

  • Bierlaire, M., K. Axhausen, and G. Abbay. (2001). “Acceptance of Model Innovation: The Case of the Swissmetro.” Proceedings of the 1st Swiss Transport Research Conference.

  • Bierlaire, M., T. Lotan, and P.L. Toint. (1997). “On the Overspecification of Multinomial and Nested Logit Models Due to Alternative Specific Constants.” Transportation Science, 31(4), 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierlaire, M., R. Mishalani, and M. Ben-Akiva. (2000). “General Framework for Dynamic Demand Simulation.” Technical Report RO-000223, ROSO-DMA-EPFL Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne. http://roso.epfl.ch/mbi/demand-report.pdf.

  • Bierlaire, M. and M. Thémans. (2005). “Algorithmic Developments for the Estimate of Advanced Discrete Choice Models.” Proceedings of the 5th Swiss Transportation Research Conference. www.strc.ch.

  • Chatterjee, K., N. Hounsell, P. Firmin, and P. Bonsall. (2002). “Driver Response to Variable Message Sign Information in London.” Transportation Research C, 10, 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, A.R., N.I.M. Gould, and P.L. Toint. (1992). “LANCELOT: A Fortran Package for Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization (Release A).” Number 17 in Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York.

  • Dennis, J.E. and R.B. Schnabel. (1983). Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, USA.

  • Forinash, C.V. and F.S. Koppelman. (1993). “Application and Interpretation of Nested Logit Models of Intercity Mode Choice.” Transportation Research Record Issue, 1413, 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, F. (1977). “Heuristic for Integer Programming Using Surrogate Constraints.” Decision Sciences, 8, 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. (1986). “The Steepest Ascent Mildest Descent Heuristic for Combinatorial Programming.” Technical Report, Congress on Numerical Methods in Combinatorial Optimization. Capri, Italy.

  • Hansen, P. and B. Jaumard. (1987). “Algorithms for the Maximum Satisfiability Problem.” Technical Report Rutgers University.

  • Hansen, P. and N. Mladenovic. (1997). “An Introduction to Variable Neighborhood Search.” Les Cahiers du GERAD.

  • Kirkpatrick, S., C.D.J. Gelatt, and M.P. Vecchi. (1983). “Optimization by Simulated Annealing.” Science, 220, 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntsevich, A.V. and F. Kappel. (1997). The Solver for Local Nonlinear Optimization Problems. Institute for Mathematics, KarlFranzens University of Graz, Heinrichstr. 36, A-8010 Graz (Austria). www.kfunigraz.ac.at/imawww/kuntsevich/solvopt/content.html.

  • Lawrence, C., J. Zhou, and A. Tits. (1997). “User's Guide for CFSQP Version 2.5: A C Code for Solving (Large Scale) Constrained Nonlinear (Minimax) Optimization Problems, Generating Iterates Satisfying All Inequality Constraints.” Technical Report TR-94-16r1, Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, 1997.

  • McFadden, D. (1978). “Modelling the Choice of Residential Location.” In A. Karlquist et al. (eds.), Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 75–96.

  • Murtagh, B.A. and M.A. Saunders. (1987). MINOS 5.1 USER'S GUIDE, Technical Report SOL83-20R, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, USA.

  • Papola, A. (2004). “Some Developments on the Cross-Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research B, 38(9), 833–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prashker, J. and S. Bekhor. (1999). “Stochastic User-Equilibrium Formulations for Extended-Logit Assignment Models.” Transportation Research Record, 1676, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossier, Y., M. Troyon, and T.M. Liebling. (1986). “Probabilistic Exchange Algorithms and Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problems.” OR Spektrum, 8(3), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, K. (1987). “A Discrete Choice Model for Ordered Alternatives.” Econometrica, 55(2), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellucci, P. (1993). DONLP2 Users Guide, Dept. of Mathematics, Technical University at Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.

  • Swait, J. (2001). “Choice Set Generation Within the Generalized Extreme Value Family of Discrete Choice Models.” Transportation Research B, 35(7), 643–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vovsha, P. (1997). “Cross-Nested Logit Model: An Application to Mode Choice in the Tel-Aviv Metropolitan Area.” Transportation Research Record, 1607, 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vovsha, P. and S. Bekhor. (1998). “The Link-Nested Logit Model of Route Choice: Overcoming the Route Overlapping Problem.” Transportation Research Record, 1645, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen, C.-H. and F.S. Koppelman. (2001). “The Generalized Nested Logit Model.” Transportation Research B, 35(7), 627–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H. (1977). “On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Measures of User Benefit.” Environment and Planning, 9A, 285–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L. C. (2000). “A Heteroscedastic Generalized Extreme Value Discrete Choice Model.” Sociological Methods and Research, 29, 118–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mathematics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Michel Bierlaire

Authors
  1. Michel Bierlaire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Bierlaire.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bierlaire, M. A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model. Ann Oper Res 144, 287–300 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0015-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-0015-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation