Abstract
From the analysis of all available radiometric measurements of distances between the Earth and the major planets (including observations of martian landers and orbiters over 1971–2003 with the errors of few meters) the positive secular trend in the Astronomical Unit AU is estimated as \({{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} {\rm AU} = 15 \pm 4 {\rm m/cy}\) . The given uncertainty is the 10 times enlarged formal error of the least-squares estimate and so accounts for possible systematic errors of measurements and deficiencies of the mathematical model. The reliability of this estimate as well as its physical meaning are discussed. A priori most plausible attribution of this effect to the cosmological expansion of the Universe turns out inadequate. A model of the observables developed in the frame of the relativistic background metric of the uniform isotropic Universe shows that the corresponding dynamical perturbations in the major planet motions are completely canceled out by the Einstein effect of dependence of the rate of the observer’s clock (that keeps the proper time) on the gravitational field, though separately values of these two effects are quite large and attainable with the accuracy achieved. Another tentative source of the secular rate of AU is the loss of the solar mass due to the solar wind and electromagnetic radiation but it amounts in \({{\rm d} \over {{\rm d} t}} {\rm AU}\) only to 0.3 m/cy. Excluding other explanations that seem exotic (such as secular decrease of the gravitational constant) at present there is no satisfactory explanation of the detected secular increase of AU, at least in the frame of the considered uniform models of the Universe.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. A. Brumberg (1991) Essential Relativistic Celestial Mechanics Hilger Bristol
Fock, V. A.: 1955, Theory of Space, Time and Gravitation, Moscow (in Russian).
L. Infeld J. Plebanski (1960) Motion and Relativity Pergamon Press New York
G. Järnefelt (1940) Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae, A 45 3
G. Järnefelt (1942) Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae, A 45 12
G. A. Krasinsky (1999) Celes. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 75 39 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008381000993
Krasinsky, G. A. and Vasilyev, M. V.: 1997, In: I. M.Wytrzyszczak, J. H. Lieske and R. A. Feldman (eds.), Dynamics and Astrometry of Natural and Artificial Celestial Bodies, Kluwer, 239 p.
G. A. Krasinsky E. V. Pitjeva M. V. Vasilyev E. I. Yagudina (2001) Communications of IAA RAS, 139 IAA Saint-Petersburg
G. A. Krasinsky E. V. Pitjeva M. V. Vasilyev E. I. Yagudina (2002) Icarus 158 98 Occurrence Handle10.1006/icar.2002.6837
G. A. Krasinsky (2002) Communications of IAA RAS, 148 IAA Saint-Petersburg
Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M.: 1967, Theoretical Physics, Vol. 2, Field Theory, Moscow (in Russian).
A. P. Lightman W. H. Press R. H. Price S. A. Teukolsky (1975) Problem Book in Relativity and Gravitation Princeton New Jersey
C. J. Masreliez (1999) ApSS 266 399
G. C. McVittie (1933) MNRAS 93 325
Newhall XX, Standish E. M. and Williams J. G.: 1983, AA, 150.
E. V. Pitjeva (2001) Celes. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 80 249
E. V. Pitjeva (2003) Communications of IAA RAS, 157, 3 IAA Saint-Petersburg
Spergel, D. N., Verde L., et al. in press, ApJ.
Standish, E. M.: 1998, JPL Interoffice Memorandum, 312.F-98-048, JPL.
Suniaev, R. A. (ed.): 1986, Physics of Cosmos. Sovetskaya Enziklopedia, Moscow (in Russian).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krasinsky, G.A., Brumberg, V.A. Secular increase of astronomical unit from analysis of the major planet motions, and its interpretation. Celestial Mech Dyn Astr 90, 267–288 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-0633-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-0633-z