Skip to main content
Log in

Scope Dominance with Monotone Quantifiers over Finite Domains

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We characterize pairs of monotone generalized quantifiers Q 1 and Q 2 over finite domains that give rise to an entailment relation between their two relative scope construals. This relation between quantifiers, which is referred to as scope dominance, is used for identifying entailment relations between the two scopal interpretations of simple sentences of the form NP1–V–NP2. Simple numerical or set-theoretical considerations that follow from our main result are used for characterizing such relations. The variety of examples in which they hold are shown to go far beyond the familiar existential-universal type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, A. and Winter, Y., 2003, “Computing dominant readings with upward monotone quantifiers,” To appear in Research on Language and Computation, Downloadable at http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~winter/

  • Altman, A., Peterzil, Y., and Winter, Y., 2002, “Scope dominance with upward monotone quantifiers,” Unpublished manuscript, Technion and Haifa University, Downloadable at http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~winter/

  • Eijck, D. J. N. and Jaspars, J. O. M., 1996, “Ambiguity and Reasoning,” Technical report, Computer Science/Department of Software Technology, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica (CWI), CS-R9616.

  • Reyle, U., 1993, “Dealing with ambiguities by underspecification: Construction, representation, and deduction,” Journal of Semantics 10, 123–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U., 1995, “On reasoning with ambiguities,” in Proceedings of the EACL’95.

  • Reyle, U., 1996, “Co-indexing labelled DRSS to represent and reason with ambiguities,” in Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification, K. van Deemter and S. Peters, eds. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vänänen, J. and Westerståhl, D., 2002, “On the expressive power of monotone natural language quantifiers over finite sets,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 31, 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Benthem, J., 1989, “Polyadic quantifiers,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Deemter, K., 1998, “Ambiguity and Idiosyncratic Interpretation,” Journal of Semantics 15, 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Deemter, K., 1996, “Towards a Logic of Ambiguous Expressions,” in Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification, K. van Deemter and S. Peters, eds. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, Sweden, pp. 203–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerståhl, D., 1986, “On the order between quantifiers,” in Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, M. Furberg, eds., Göteborg University, pp. 273–285.

  • Westerståhl, D., 1996, “Self-commuting quantifiers,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 61, 212–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, T. E., 1993, “Scopeless quantifiers and operators,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 22, 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilad Ben-Avi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Avi, G., Winter, Y. Scope Dominance with Monotone Quantifiers over Finite Domains. J Logic Lang Inf 13, 385–402 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-004-2112-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-004-2112-z

Key words

Navigation