Abstract.
The Deligne—Simpson problem (DSP) (respectively, the weak DSP) is formulated as follows: give necessary and sufficient conditions for the choice of the conjugacy classes C j ⊂ GL(n, ℂ) or c j ⊂ gl(n, ℂ) so that there exist irreducible (respectively, with trivial centralizer) (p + 1)-tuples of matrices M j ∈ C j or A j ∈ c j satisfying the equality M1 ... Mp+1 = I or A1 + ... + Ap+1 = 0. The matrices M j and A j are interpreted as monodromy operators of regular linear systems and as matrices-residua of Fuchsian ones on the Riemann sphere. For ((p + 1))-tuples of conjugacy classes one of which is with distinct eigenvalues we prove that the variety {(M1, ..., Mp+1) | M j ∈ C j , M1 ... Mp+1 = I} or {(A1, ..., Ap+1) | A j ∈ c j , A1 + ... + Ap+1 = 0| is connected if the DSP is positively solved for the given conjugacy classes and give necessary and sufficient conditions for the positive solvability of the weak DSP.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. V. I. Arnold and V. I. Ilyashenko, Ordinary differential equations. In Dynamical Systems I, Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences 1, Springer-Verlag (1988).
2. A. A. Bolibrukh, Hilbert’s twenty-first problem for linear Fuchsian systems. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 206 (1995), No. 5.
3. A. A. Bolibrukh, The Riemann—Hilbert problem. Russ. Math. Surv. 45 (1990), No. 2, 1–49.
4. W. Crawley-Boevey, On matrices in prescribed conjugacy classes with no common invariant subspace and sum zero. Preprint arXiv:math.LA/0103101 (2001); to appear in Duke Math. J. 118 (2003).
5. F. R. Gantmacher, The theory of matrices. Vol. 1, 2. Chelsea Publ., New York (1959).
6. W. Hesselink, Singularities in the nilpotent scheme of a classical group. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 222 (1976), 1–32.
7. N. M. Katz, Rigid local systems. Ann. Math. Stud. Ser. 139 (1995).
8. V. P. Kostov, The Deligne—Simpson problem. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 329 (1999), 657–662.
9. V. P. Kostov, On the Deligne—Simpson problem. Electronic preprint math.AG/0011013; to appear in Proc. Steklov Math. Inst. 238 (2002).
10. V. P. Kostov, On some aspects of the Deligne—Simpson problem. J. Dynam. Control Systems 9 (2003), No. 3, 393–436; Preprint math.AG/0005016.
11. V. P. Kostov, Monodromy groups of regular systems on Riemann’s sphere. Preprint No. 401, Univ. de Nice (1994).
12. V. P. Kostov, Some examples of rigid representations. Serdica Math. J. 26 (2000), 253–276.
13. V. P. Kostov, Quantum states of monodromy group. J. Dynam. Control Systems 5 (1999), No. 1, 51–100.
14. V. P. Kostov, Some examples related to the Deligne—Simpson problem. Preprint math.AG/0011015.
15. V. P. Kostov, Examples illustrating some aspects of the Deligne—Simpson problem. Serdica Math. J. 27 (2001), No. 2, 143–158; Preprint math.AG0101141.
16. H. Kraft, Parametrisierung von Konjugationsklassen in sl. Math. Ann. 234 (1978), 209–220.
17. C. T. Simpson, Products of matrices. In: Differential Geometry, Global Analysis, and Topology, Canad. Math. Soc. Conference Proceedings 12, AMS, Providence (1992), 157–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 15A30, 15A24, 20G05.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kostov, V. The Connectedness of Some Varieties and the Deligne—Simpson Problem. J Dyn Control Syst 11, 125–155 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-005-0004-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-005-0004-4