Convergence theorems for equilibrium problem, variational inequality problem and countably infinite relatively quasi-nonexpansive mappings

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.02.054Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an iterative process which converges strongly to a common element of set of common fixed points of countably infinite family of closed relatively quasi- nonexpansive mappings, the solution set of generalized equilibrium problem and the solution set of the variational inequality problem for a γ-inverse strongly monotone mapping in Banach spaces. Our theorems improve, generalize, unify and extend several results recently announced.

Introduction

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Banach space E with dual E. We denote by J the normalized duality mapping from E to 2E defined byJx:=fE:x,f=x2=f2,where .,. denotes the generalized duality pairing. It is well known that if Eis strictly convex then J is single-valued and if E is uniformly smooth then J is uniformly continuous on bounded subsets of E. Moreover, if E is a reflexive and strictly convex Banach space with a strictly convex dual, then J-1 is single-valued, one-to-one, surjective, and it is the duality mapping from E into E and thus JJ-1=IE and J-1J=IE (see, [16]). We note that in a Hilbert space, H,J is the identity operator.

A mapping A:D(A)EE is said to be monotone if for each x,yD(A), the following inequality holds:Ax-Ay,x-y0.

A is said to be γ-inverse strongly monotone if there exists positive real number γ such thatAx-Ay,x-yγAx-Ay2,forallx,yD(A).

If A is γ-inverse strongly monotone, then it is Lipschitz continuous with constant 1γ, i.e., Ax-Ay1γx-y, for all x,yD(A), and hence uniformly continuous.

Let A:CE be a monotone map. The variational inequality problem for A is to find xˆC such thatAxˆ,y-xˆ0,yC.

The set of solution of (1.3) is denoted by VI(A,C).

Let f:C×CR be a bifunction, where R is the set of real numbers. The equilibrium problem for f is tofindxCsuchthatf(x,y)0,yC.

The set of solutions of (1.4) is denoted by EP(f).

The equilibrium problem (1.4) is very general in the sense that it includes, as special cases, optimization problems, variational inequalities, the Nash equilibrium problems; (see, for instance, [2]). For solving the equilibrium problem for a bifunction f:C×CR, we assume that f satisfies the following conditions:

  • (A1)

    f(x,x)=0 for all xC,

  • (A2)

    f is monotone, i.e, f(x,y)+f(y,x)0 for all x,yC,

  • (A3)

    for each x,y,zC,limt0f(tz+(1-t)x,y)f(x,y),

  • (A4)

    for each xC, the mapping yf(x,y) is convex and lower semicontinuous.

Let E be a smooth Banach space. The function ϕ:E×ER defined byϕ(x,y)=x2-2x,Jy+y2forx,yE,is studied by Alber [1], Kamimula and Takahashi [5] and Riech [12]. It is obvious from the definition of the function ϕ that(x-y)2ϕ(x,y)(x+y)2forx,yE.

Observe that in a Hilbert space H, (1.5) reduces to ϕ(x,y)=x-y2, for x,yH.

Let E be a reflexive, strictly convex and smooth Banach space and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of E. The generalized projection mapping, introduced by Alber [1], is a mapping ΠC:EC, that assigns to an arbitrary point xE the minimum point of the functional ϕ(y,x), that is, ΠCx=x¯, where x¯ is the solution to the minimization problemϕ(x¯,x)=min{ϕ(y,x),yC}.

In fact, we have the following result.

Lemma 1.1 [1]

Let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a real reflexive, strictly convex, and smooth Banach space E and let xE. Then, there exists a unique element x0C such that ϕ(x0,x)=min{ϕ(z,x):zC}.

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of E, and let T be a mapping from K into itself. We denote by F(T) the set of fixed points of T. A point p in C is said to be an asymptotic fixed point of T (see e.g., [12]) if C contains a sequence {xn} which converges weakly to p such that limnxn-Txn=0. The set of asymptotic fixed points of T will be denoted by F(T). A mapping T from C into itself is said to be nonexpansive if Tx-Tyx-yx,yC and is called relatively nonexpansive (see e.g., [14], [19]) if F(T)=F(T) and ϕ(p,Tx)ϕ(p,x) for all xC and pF(T). The asymptotic behavior of relatively nonexpansive mapping was studied in [3]. T is said to be relatively quasi-nonexpansive if F(T) and ϕ(p,Tx)ϕ(p,x) for xC and pF(T).

Remark 1.2

The class of relatively quasi-nonexpansive mappings is more general than the class of relatively nonexpansive mappings (see [3]) which requires the strong restriction: F(T)=F(T).

If E is smooth, strictly convex and reflexive Banach space, and AE×E is a continuous monotone mapping with A-1(0) then it is proved in [6] that Jr:=(J+rA)-1J, for r>0 is relatively quasi-nonexpansive. Moreover, if T:EE is relatively quasi-nonexpansive then using the definition of ϕ one can show that F(T) is closed and convex (see, [10]).

In 1953, Mann [8] introduced the iteration sequence {xn} defined byxn+1=αnxn+(1-αn)Txn,where the initial guess element x0C is arbitrary and {αn} is a real sequence in [0, 1], for nonexpansive mapping T. One of the fundamental convergence results is proved by Reich [11]. He proved that the sequence (1.7) converges weakly to a fixed point of T, under appropriate conditions on {αn} and Banach space E. In an infinite dimensional Hilbert space, the Mann iteration can conclude only week convergence [4]. Attempts to modify the Mann iteration method (1.7) so that strong convergence is guaranteed have recently been made. Nakajo and Takahashi [9] proposed the following modification of the Mann iteration method (1.7):x0Cchosenarbitrarily,yn=αnxn+(1-αn)Txn,Cn={zC:yn-zxn-z},Qn={zC:xn-z,x0-xn0},xn+1=PCnQn(x0),n0,and proved that {xn} converges strongly to z=PF(T)(x0), where PC is the projection mapping from a Hilbert space H onto a closed convex subset C of H.

For finding an element of FP(f)F(T), Tada and Takahashi [15] introduced the following iterative scheme by the hybrid method in a Hilbert space:x0Cchosenarbitrarily,unCsuchthatf(un,y)+1rny-un,un-xn0,yC,wn=(1-αn)xn+αnTun,Cn={zH:wn-zxn-z},Qn={zC:xn-z,x0-xn0},xn+1=PCnQn(x0),n0,where {αn}[a,b] for some a,b(0,1) and {rn}(0,) satisfies liminfnrn>0. Further, they proved that {xn} and {un} converge strongly to zEP(f)F(T), where z=PEP(f)F(T)(x0).

For finding an element of F(T)VI(A,C)EP(f), Kumam [7] introduced the following iterative scheme:x0Cchosenarbitrarily,unCsuchthatf(un,y)+1rny-un,un-xn0,yC,wn=αnxn+(1-αn)TPC(un-λnAun),Cn={zH:wn-zxn-z},Qn={zC:xn-z,x0-xn0},xn+1=PCnQn(x0),n0.

Under suitable conditions some strong convergence theorems, which extended and improved the result of Nakajo and Takahashi [9] and Tada and Takahashi [15], are proved in fact in the frame work of Hilbert spaces.

Recently, Takahashi and Zembayashi [17], introduced the following iterative scheme which is called the shrinking projection method:x0Cchosenarbitrarily,yn=J-1(αnJxn+(1-αn)JTxn),unCsuchthatf(un,y)+1rny-un,Jun-Jyn0,yC,Cn+1={zCn:ϕ(z,un)ϕ(z,xn)},xn+1=ΠCn+1(x0),n0,for relatively nonexpansive mapping T:CC and bifunction f from C×C to R, where J is the duality mapping on E and ΠC is the generalized projection from E onto C. They proved that the sequence {xn} converges strongly to q=ΠF(T)EP(f)(x0) under appropriate conditions.

Very recently, Qin et al. [10] extended the iteration process (1.11) from a single relatively nonexpansive mapping to two relatively nonexpansive mappings. In fact, they proved that the sequence {xn} generated by:x0C0=Cchosenarbitrarily,yn=J-1(αnJxn+βnJTxn+γnJSxn),unCsuchthatf(un,y)+1rny-un,Jun-Jyn0,yC,Cn+1={zCn:ϕ(z,un)ϕ(z,xn)},xn+1=ΠCn+1(x0),n0,where T and S are relatively nonexpansive and {αn},{βn} and {γn} satisfy appropriate conditions, converges strongly to q=ΠF(T)F(S)EP(f)(x0).

In this paper, inspired and motivated by the works mentioned above, we introduce an iterative process for finding a common element of set of common fixed points of countably infinite family of closed relatively quasi-nonexpansive mappings, the solution set of generalized equilibrium problem and the solution set of the variational inequality problem for a γ-inverse strongly monotone mapping in Banach spaces. The corresponding results of Qin et al. [10], Takahashi and Zembayashi [17], Kumam [7], Nakajo and Takahashi [9] and Tada and Takahashi [15] are extended to the case of countably infinite family of closed quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces more general than Hilbert spaces.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

Let E be a normed linear space with dim(E)2. The modulus of smoothness of E is the function ρE:[0,)[0,) defined byρE(τ):=supx+y+x-y2-1:x=1;y=τ.

The space E is said to be smooth if ρE(τ)>0,τ>0 and E is called uniformly smooth if and only if limt0+ρE(t)t=0.

The modulus of convexity of E is the function δE:(0,2][0,1] defined byδE(ϵ):=inf1-x+y2:x=y=1;ϵ=x-y.

E is called uniformly convex if and only if δE(ϵ)>0 for every ϵ(0,2]. Let p>1, then E is said to be p-uniformly convex if

Main results

Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a 2-uniformly convex and uniformly smooth real Banach space E. Let f:C×CR be a bifunction. Let Tj:CC,j=1,2, be a countably infinite family of closed quasi-relatively nonexpansive mappings and A:CE, be a γ-inverse strongly monotone operator with constants γ(0,1); then in what follows, we shall study the following iteration process:x0C0=Cchosenarbitrarily,zn=ΠCJ-1(Jxn-λnAxn),yn=J-1(βJxn+(1-β)JTzn);un,Cs.t.f(un,y)+1rny-un,Jun-Jyn0,yC,Cn+1={z

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (85)

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

He undertook this work when he was visiting the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy, as a Regular Associate of the Center.

2

His research was supported by the Japanesse Mori (STEP) fellowship of UNESCO at the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.

View full text