Dynamics of a competitive Lotka–Volterra system with three delays☆
Introduction
The n-species Lotka–Volterra competition system with delays can be modeled by the following systemwhere are positive constants, and can be interpreted as the densities of certain species. In the absence of interspecific interactions, the species is governed by the well known logistic equation . In the presence of interactions, each species restrains the average growth rate of the other and has the corresponding delay.
Recently, there have been extensive literatures dealing with the above system or systems similar to the above system, regarding attractivity, persistence, global stabilities of equilibrium and other dynamics (see, for example, [1], [2], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19] and references therein). For a long time, it has been recognized that delays can have very complicated impact on the dynamics of a system (see, for example, monographes by Hale and Lunel [4], Kuang [6] and Wu [9]). For example, delays can cause the loss of stability and can induce various oscillations and periodic solutions through the Hopf bifurcation in delay differential equations, and the study on the stability and local Hopf bifurcation of systems similar to the above system can be seen in [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
In this paper, we consider the following three-species Lotka–Volterra competition system with discrete delays described byand the initial conditionswhere denote the density of species at time t, respectively; is the feedback time delay of species to the growth of species itself; is the intrinsic growth rate of the ith species and are interaction coefficients measuring the extent to which the jth species affects the growth rate of the ith species.
Considered the biological interpretation of system (1.1), there is always a unique positive equilibrium provided that the conditionhold, whereWhen the delay , the system (1.1) simplifies to an autonomous system of ordinary differential equation of the form
The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of the delay on the solutions of system (1.1), and we mainly study the stability, the local Hopf bifurcation for system (1.1). We would like to mention that bifurcations in a population dynamics with a single delay or two delays had been investigated by many researchers (see, for example, [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]). However, there are few papers on the bifurcation of a population dynamics with three delays or multiple delays. Hence, the research of Hopf bifurcation for competitive Lotka–Volterra systems with three or multiple delays is worth further consideration.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the stability of the equilibrium and the existence of Hopf bifurcation at the positive equilibrium are studied. In Section 3, the direction of Hopf bifurcation, stability and period of bifurcating periodic solutions on the center manifold are determined. Numerical simulations supporting our theoretical results are also included in Section 4. Finally, we give some biological explanations and conclusions.
Section snippets
Stability of the positive equilibrium and existence of local Hopf bifurcation
In this section, we always have the following assumption.For convenience, let us introduce new variables so that system (1.1) can be written as the following equivalent system with a single delay:Under the hypothesis , let
Direction of Hopf bifurcation and stability of bifurcating periodic solutions
In this section, we focus on investigating the direction of Hopf bifurcation, stability and period of the periodic solution bifurcating from the positive equilibrium . Following the ideas of Hassard et al.[5], we derive the explicit formulae for determining the properties of Hopf bifurcation at the critical value by employing the normal form method and the center manifold theorem. Without loss of generality, we denote any one of these critical values by at which Eq.
Numerical simulations
As an example, we consider system with , that iswhere initial value is .
Clearly, the conditions of Theorem 2.3 hold for system (4.1). By computing, we may obtain that a unique positive equilibrium in system (4.1), in (2.3), in (2.5) and in (2.7). The computer simulations (see Fig. 1) show that is stable
Biological explanations and conclusions
From the analysis in Section 2, we know that if the condition hold, then the positive equilibrium of system (1.1) is asymptotically stable when . This shows that, in this case, the density of three species will tend to stabilization, respectively, and this fact is not influenced by the delay . Furthermore, when crosses through the critical value , the positive equilibrium of system (1.1) loses stability and a Hopf bifurcation occurs. This shows that the density
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the referees for their careful reading of the manuscript and many valuable comments and suggestions that greatly improved the presentation of this work.
References (19)
- et al.
Convergence results in a well-known delayed predator–prey system
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(1996) Stability and bifurcation for a delay predator–prey model and the effect of diffusion
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(2001)- et al.
Stability and Hopf bifurcation in a competitive Lotka–Volterra system with two delays
Chaos Solitons Fract.
(2004) - et al.
Local Hopf bifurcation and global periodic solutions in a delayed predator–prey system
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(2005) - et al.
Bifurcation and global periodic solutions in a delayed facultative mutualism system
Physica D
(2007) - et al.
Hopf bifurcation and global periodic solutions in a delayed predator–prey system
Appl. Math. Comput.
(2006) - et al.
Hopf bifurcation in a delayed Lotka–Volterra predator–prey system
Nonlinar Anal.
(2008) - et al.
Global existence of periodic solutions in a class of delayed Gause-type predator–prey system
Nonlinar Anal.
(1997) - et al.
Global attractivity in a competitive system with feedback controls
Comput. Math. Appl.
(2003)