Elsevier

Journal of Econometrics

Volume 176, Issue 2, October 2013, Pages 93-111
Journal of Econometrics

Density approximations for multivariate affine jump-diffusion processes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2012.12.003Get rights and content

Abstract

We introduce closed-form transition density expansions for multivariate affine jump-diffusion processes. The expansions rely on a general approximation theory which we develop in weighted Hilbert spaces for random variables which possess all polynomial moments. We establish parametric conditions which guarantee existence and differentiability of transition densities of affine models and show how they naturally fit into the approximation framework. Empirical applications in option pricing, credit risk, and likelihood inference highlight the usefulness of our expansions. The approximations are extremely fast to evaluate, and they perform very accurately and numerically stable.

Introduction

Most observed phenomena in financial markets are inherently multivariate: stochastic trends, stochastic volatility, and the leverage effect in equity markets are well-known examples. The theory of affine processes provides multivariate stochastic models with a well established theoretical basis and sufficient degree of tractability to model such empirical attributes. They enjoy much attention and are widely used in practice and academia. Among their best-known proponents are Vasicek’s interest rate model (Vasicek, 1977), the square-root model (Cox et al., 1985), Heston’s model (cf.  Heston, 1993), and affine term structure models (Duffie and Kan, 1996, Dai and Singleton, 2000, Collin-Dufresne et al., 2008). Affine models owe their popularity and their name to their key defining property: their characteristic function is of exponential affine form and can be computed by solving a system of generalized Riccati differential equations (cf.  Duffie et al. (2003)). This allows for computing transition densities and transition probabilities by means of Fourier inversion (Duffie et al., 2000). Transition densities constitute the likelihood which is an ingredient for both frequentist and Bayesian econometric methodologies.1 Also, they appear in the pricing of financial derivatives. However, Fourier inversion is a very delicate task. Complexity and numerical difficulties increase with the dimensionality of the process. Efficient density approximations avoiding the need for Fourier inversion are therefore desirable.

This paper is concerned with directly approximating the transition density without resorting to Fourier inversion techniques. We pursue a polynomial expansion approach, an idea that has been proposed by  Wong and Thomas (1962),  Wong (1964),  Schoutens (2000),  Schaumburg (2001),  Aït-Sahalia (2002), and  Hurn et al. (2008) among others for univariate diffusion processes. Extensions for multivariate (jump-)diffusions do exist in  Aït-Sahalia (2008)  (with applications in  Aït-Sahalia and Kimmel, 2007, Aït-Sahalia and Kimmel, 2010), and  Yu (2007), but they follow a different route by approximating the Kolmogorov forward-, and backward partial differential equations. Our approach exploits a crucial property of affine processes. Under some technical conditions, conditional moments of all orders exist and can be explicitly computed in closed form as the solution of a matrix exponential. This ensures that the coefficients of the polynomial expansions can be computed without an approximation error.

We present a general theory of density approximations with several traits of the affine model class in mind. The assumptions made for the general theory are then justified by proving existence and differentiability of the true, unknown transition densities of affine models. These theoretical results, contrary to the density approximations themselves, do rely on Fourier theory. Specifically, we investigate the asymptotic behavior of the characteristic function with novel ODE techniques.

Specializing to affine models we improve earlier work along several lines. Our method (i) is applicable to multivariate models; (ii) works equally well for reducible and irreducible processes in the sense of Aït-Sahalia (2008),2  in particular stochastic volatility models; (iii) produces density approximations the quality of which is independent of the time interval between observations; (iv) allows for expansions on the “correct” state space. That is, the support of the density approximation agrees with the support of the true, unknown transition density as in  Hurn et al. (2008) and  Schoutens (2000); (v) produces density approximations that integrate to unity by construction, hence are much more amenable to applications that demand the constant of proportionality than the purely polynomial expansions from  Aït-Sahalia (2008).3 This includes Wishart processes (Bru, 1991) and even general affine matrix-valued processes (Cuchiero et al., 2010). This paper therefore provides a unified framework for econometric inference for financial models, because in applications one typically needs to evaluate, both, the transition densities themselves, as well as integrals of payoff functions against the transition densities for model-based asset pricing. This complements the methods recently developed in  Chen and Joslin (2011) and  Kristensen and Mele (2011), which are aimed at asset pricing.4

The paper proceeds as follows: Section  2 develops a general theory of orthonormal polynomial density approximations in certain weighted L2 spaces under suitable integrability and regularity assumptions. These may be validated by the sufficient criteria presented subsequently in Section  3. The density approximations are then specialized within the context of affine processes: Section  4 reviews the affine transform formula and the polynomial moment formula for affine processes, which in turn allows the aforementioned polynomial approximations. The main theoretical contribution–general results on existence and differentiability of transition densities of affine processes–is elaborated in Section  4.3. In Section  5 we introduce candidate weight functions and the Gram–Schmidt algorithm to compute orthonormal polynomial bases corresponding to these weights, along with important examples. Section  6 details computation of the ingredients to the density expansions using an explicit example. Section  7 relates existing techniques for density approximations to ours. An empirical study is presented in Section  8: Applications in stochastic volatility (Section  8.1), option pricing (Section  8.2), credit risk (Section  8.3), and likelihood inference (Section  8.4), support the tractability and usefulness of the likelihood expansions. Section  9 concludes. The proofs of our main results are given in an Appendix.

In the paper we will use the following notational conventions. The nonnegative integers are denoted by N0. The length of a multi-index α=(α1,,αd)N0d is defined by |α|=α1++αd, and we write ξα=ξ1α1ξdαd for any ξRd. The degree of a polynomial p(x)=|α|0pαxα in xRd is defined as degp(x)=max{|α|pα0}. For the likelihood ratio functions below we define 0/0=0. The class of p-times continuously differentiable (or continuous, if p=0) functions on Rd is denoted by Cp.

Section snippets

Density approximations

Let g denote a probability density on Rd whose polynomial moments μα=Rdξαg(ξ)dξ of every order αN0d exist and are known in closed form. For example, g may denote the pricing density in a financial market model. Typically, g is not known in explicit form, and needs to be approximated. Let w be an auxiliary probability density function on Rd. The aim is to expand the likelihood ratio g/w in terms of orthonormal polynomials of w in order to get an explicit approximation of the unknown density

Sufficient conditions for Assumptions 1 and 2

In this section we provide sufficient conditions for Assumption 1, Assumption 2 to hold. The proofs of the following lemmas are deferred to Appendix B. We first provide sufficient conditions on w that guarantee that Assumption 1 is satisfied.

Lemma 3.1

Suppose that the density functionwhas a finite exponential momentRdeϵ0ξw(ξ)dξ<for someϵ0>0. Then the set of polynomials is dense inLw2. Moreover,   Assumption  1   is satisfied.

In applications, the auxiliary density function w on Rd will often be given

Affine models

The main application of the polynomial density approximation are affine factor models. In this section, we follow the setup of  Duffie et al. (2003), which we now briefly recap. Let d=m+n1. We define the index set J={m+1,,d}, and write vJ=(vm+1,,vd) and mJJ=(mkl)k,lJ, for any vector v and matrix m. We consider an affine process X on the canonical state space D=R+m×Rn with generator

Af(x)=k,l=1d(diag(0,a)+i=1mxiαi)kl2f(x)xkxl+(b+βx)f(x)+D(f(x+ξ)f(x)χJ(ξ)Jf(x))m(dξ)+D(f(x+ξ)f(x))(

Examples of auxiliary density functions

For applications of the polynomial density approximations to affine models we are free to choose any auxiliary density function w as L2 weight, limited only by the requirements of Assumption 1, Assumption 2. For Lévy-driven stochastic differential equations,  Schaumburg (2001) uses the densities of the driving Lévy processes. For affine processes there is no such obvious candidate in general. We therefore pursue an approach with auxiliary densities with exponential tails, which are reasonably

Explicit example

In the present section we illustrate the necessary steps to engineer a density expansion to order J=4. We adopt notation used conventionally in finance and econometrics. In particular we deviate from  Duffie et al. (2003) notation. From here onward the time interval between observations is denoted by Δ.

Consider as an example the Basic Affine Jump-Diffusion process (BAJD) Y with domain D=R+, solving the SDE dYt=(κθκYt)dt+σYtdWt+dLt. Here, L is a compound Poisson process with jump intensity l0,

Relation to existing approximations

In this section we recall facts about closed-form density approximations from previous literature and relate them to the density expansions of the present paper. A short summary of the capabilities and limitations of the different methods is reported in Table 1. The closest methodology to the one introduced in Section  2 is  Aït-Sahalia (2002) (AS02) and Chapter 1 of  Schaumburg (2001). To illustrate the differences between AS02 and our approach we devote the next section to a direct comparison

Applications

In the following we present applications which highlight the usefulness of the transition density approximations developed in this paper. For the empirical investigations considered below we find that there is a trade-off between numerical accuracy and the order of the expansion. Higher-order expansions may perform worse than low-order expansions due to numerical errors that are induced by the limited numeric precision of the computer environment in representing very large or very small

Discussion

This paper develops a general framework for density approximations for affine processes using orthonormal polynomial expansions in well-chosen weighted L2 spaces. We also provide novel existence and smoothness results for their true, unknown transition densities.

The approximations are designed to exploit the explicit polynomial moments of affine processes to compute the coefficients of the expansion without approximation error and in closed form; the computational burden is concentrated only in

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Yacine Aït-Sahalia, Michael Brandt, Anna Cieslak, Pierre Collin-Dufresne, Valentina Corradi, Ron Gallant, Cheng Hsiao (the editor), Aleksandar Mijatović, Alessandro Palandri, Benedikt Pötscher, and Gareth Roberts for helpful discussions. We are indebted to the substantial comments of two referees. We benefited from suggestions from participants of the Workshop on Financial Econometrics at the Fields institute, Toronto, the internal workshop at Warwick Business School,

References (63)

  • Y. Aït-Sahalia
  • Y. Aït-Sahalia

    Closed-form likelihood expansions for multivariate diffusions

    Annals of Statistics

    (2008)
  • L. Andersen et al.

    All your hedges in one basket

  • D. Bates

    Maximum likelihood estimation of latent affine processes

    Review of Financial Studies

    (2006)
  • P. Bernard
  • Bibby, B., Jacobsen, M., Sørensen, M., 2004. Estimating functions for discretely sampled diffusion-type models. Working...
  • M. Broadie et al.

    Exact simulation of stochastic volatility and other affine jump diffusion processes

    Operations Research

    (2006)
  • M.-F. Bru

    Wishart processes

    Journal of Theoretical Probability

    (1991)
  • Buraschi, A., Cieslak, A., Trojani, F., 2008. Correlation risk and the term structure of interest rates. Working paper,...
  • P. Carr et al.

    Option valuation using the fast Fourier transform

    Journal of Computational Finance

    (1999)
  • Chen, H., Joslin, S., 2011. Generalized transform analysis of affine processes and applications in finance. Working...
  • P. Collin-Dufresne et al.

    Identification of maximal affine term structure models

    Journal of Finance

    (2008)
  • J. Cox et al.

    A theory of the term structure of interest rates

    Econometrica

    (1985)
  • C. Cuchiero et al.

    Affine processes on positive semidefinite matrices

    The Annals of Applied Probability

    (2010)
  • C. Cuchiero et al.

    Polynomial processes and their application to mathematical finance

    Finance & Stochastics

    (2012)
  • J. Da Fonseca et al.

    A multifactor volatility Heston model

    Quantitative Finance

    (2008)
  • Q. Dai et al.

    Specification analysis of affine term structure models

    Journal of Finance

    (2000)
  • D. Duffie et al.

    Affine processes and applications in finance

    Annals of Applied Probability

    (2003)
  • D. Duffie et al.

    Risk and valuation of collateralized debt obligations

    Financial Analysts Journal

    (2001)
  • D. Duffie et al.

    A yield-factor model of interest rates

    Mathematical Finance

    (1996)
  • Cited by (97)

    • Variance swaps with mean reversion and multi-factor variance

      2024, European Journal of Operational Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text