Existence of positive solutions for nonlinear third-order three-point boundary value problems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.03.008Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the following nonlinear third-order three-point boundary value problem: u(t)+a(t)f(u(t))=0,t(0,1),u(0)=u(0)=0,u(1)=αu(η), where 0<η<1 and 1<α<1η. First, the Green’s function for the associated linear boundary value problem is constructed, and then, some useful properties of the Green’s function are obtained by a new method. Finally, existence results for at least one positive solution for the above problem are established when f is superlinear or sublinear.

Introduction

Third-order differential equations arise in a variety of different areas of applied mathematics and physics, e.g., in the deflection of a curved beam having a constant or varying cross section, a three-layer beam, electromagnetic waves or gravity driven flows and so on [5]. Recently, third-order boundary value problems (BVPs for short) have received much attention. For example, [3], [4], [7], [10], [14] discussed some third-order two-point BVPs, while [1], [2], [11], [12], [13] studied some third-order three-point BVPs. In particular, Anderson [1] obtained some existence results for positive solutions for the following BVP: x(t)=f(t,x(t)),t1tt3,x(t1)=x(t2)=0,γx(t3)+δx(t3)=0 by using the well-known Guo–Krasnoselskii and Leggett–Williams fixed point theorems [6], [8], [9]. In 2005, Sun [12] established various results on the existence of single and multiple positive solutions to some third-order differential equations satisfying the following three-point boundary conditions: x(0)=x(η)=x(1)=0, where η[12,1). The main tool in [12] was the Guo–Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem [6], [8].

Motivated greatly by the above-mentioned excellent works, in this paper we will consider the existence of a positive solution to the third-order three-point BVP u(t)+a(t)f(u(t))=0,t(0,1),u(0)=u(0)=0,u(1)=αu(η), where 0<η<1 and 1<α<1η. Throughout, we assume that the following conditions are satisfied:

(A1) fC([0,),[0,));

(A2) aC([0,1],[0,)) and is not identically zero on [ηα,η].

First, the Green’s function for the associated linear BVP is constructed, and then, some useful properties of the Green’s function are obtained by a new method. Finally, existence results of at least one positive solution for the BVP (1.4), (1.5) are established when f is superlinear or sublinear.

In order to obtain our main results, we need the following Guo–Krasnoselskii fixed point theorem [6], [8].

Theorem 1.1

Let E be a Banach space, and let KE be a cone. Assume Ω1,Ω2 are bounded open subsets of E with 0Ω1 , Ω¯1Ω2 , and letA:K(Ω¯2Ω1)Kbe a completely continuous operator such that either

(i) Auu for uKΩ1 and Auu for uKΩ2 ; or

(ii) Auu for uKΩ1 and Auu for uKΩ2 .

Then A has a fixed point in K(Ω¯2Ω1) .

Section snippets

Preliminary lemmas

In this section, we will present several important preliminary lemmas.

Lemma 2.1

Let αη1 . Then for yC[0,1] , the BVPu(t)+y(t)=0,t(0,1),u(0)=u(0)=0,u(1)=αu(η)has a unique solution u(t)=01G(t,s)y(s)ds , whereG(t,s)=12(1αη){(2tss2)(1αη)+t2s(α1),smin{η,t},t2(1αη)+t2s(α1),tsη,(2tss2)(1αη)+t2(αηs),ηst,t2(1s),max{η,t}sis called the Green’s function.

Proof

If tη, then u(t)=01G(t,s)y(s)ds=12(1αη){0t[(2tss2)(1αη)+t2s(α1)]y(s)ds+tη[t2(1αη)+t2s(α1)]y(s)ds+η1t2(1s)y(s)ds}. So, u(t)=12(1α

Main results

In this section, we will state and prove our main results.

Define f0=limu0+f(u)uandf=limuf(u)u.

Theorem 3.1

Assume that (A1) and (A2) hold. Then the BVP(1.4), (1.5)has at least one positive solution in the case

(i) f0=0 and f= (superlinear); or

(ii) f0= and f=0 (sublinear).

Proof

Let the Banach space E=C[0,1] be equipped with the norm u=max0t1|u(t)|. We define K={uE:u(t)0,t[0,1] and minηαtηu(t)γu}. Then it is obvious that K is a cone in E.

For uK, we define Au(t)=01G(t,s)a(s)f(u(s))ds,t[0,1].

Supported by the NSF of Gansu Province of China.

View full text