Homotopy analysis method for the Kawahara equation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.11.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The homotopy analysis method (HAM) is used to find a family of travelling-wave solutions of the Kawahara equation. This approximate solution, which is obtained as a series of exponentials, has a reasonable residual error. The homotopy analysis method contains the auxiliary parameter ħ, which provides us with a simple way to adjust and control the convergence region of series solution. This method is reliable and manageable.

Introduction

Nonlinear equations are widely used as models to describe complex physical phenomena in various fields of sciences. The world around us is inherently nonlinear. Nonlinear problems are more difficult to solve than linear ones. Recently, a powerful analytic method for nonlinear problems, the so-called homotopy analysis method (HAM), has been developed by Liao [1]. The homotopy analysis method (HAM) is a powerful analytical tool for nonlinear problems. This technique provides us with a simple way to ensure the convergence of the solution series, so that we can always get accurate enough approximations. Furthermore, the homotopy analysis method logically contains the nonperturbation methods such as Lyapunov’s artificial small parameter method, the δ-expansion method and Adomian’s decomposition method and homotopy perturbation method [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. HAM has been applied successfully to many nonlinear problems in engineering and science, such as application in heat radiation [6], solitary-wave solutions for the fifth-order KdV equation [7], generalized Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equation [8], boundary-layer flows over an impermeable stretched plate [9], unsteady boundary-layer flows over a stretching flat plate [10], exponentially decaying boundary layers [11], and many other problems (see [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], for example).

In this paper we apply the homotopy analysis method for finding the travelling-wave solutions of the Kawahara equation given by ut+αuux+βu3x+γu5x=0, where α, β and γ are some arbitrary constants, see [23] and the references therein. The Kawahara equation (1) occurs in the theory of magneto-acoustic waves in a plasma and in the theory of shallow water waves with surface tension. This equation was first proposed by Kawahara in 1972, as a model equation describing solitary-wave propagation in media [24]. The Kawahara equation (1) has been the subject of extensive research work in recent publications [25], [26], [27].

Section snippets

Mathematical formulation

Consider the travelling-wave solutions of Eq. (1). It is convenient to introduce a new dependent variable w(ξ) defined by u(x,t)=aw(ξ), where ξ=xct, a is the amplitude, and c is the wave speed. Substitution of u given by (2) into Eq. (1) gives γw(5)+βw+αawwcw=0, and integrating once gives γw(4)+βw+α2aw2cw=0, where the prime denotes the differentiation with respect to ξ.

Write w(ξ)Bexp(μξ),as ξ, where μ>0 and B are constants. Substituting (4) into (3) and balancing the main term yields

Result analysis

For simplicity, in the rest of this section and in the next section, we set c=1 or c=1, for finding a real value for μ from (5). In this section we consider two cases.

Conclusions

In this paper, the homotopy analysis method (HAM) [1] is applied to obtain the travelling-wave solution of the Kawahara equation. HAM provides us with a convenient way to control the convergence of approximation series, which is a fundamental qualitative difference in analysis between HAM and other methods. Our examples show that, the best value for ħ is not −1. So, examples show the flexibility and potential of the homotopy analysis method for complicated nonlinear problems in engineering.

References (27)

  • S. Abbasbandy

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2006)
  • S. Abbasbandy

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2007)
  • F.M. Allan

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2007)
  • S. Abbasbandy

    Int. Commun. Heat Mass

    (2007)
  • S.J. Liao

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer

    (2005)
  • S.J. Liao et al.

    Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer

    (2006)
  • Y. Tan et al.

    Chaos, Solitons Fractals

    (2007)
  • W. Wu et al.

    Chaos, Solitons Fractals

    (2005)
  • T. Hayat et al.

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2007)
  • M. Sajid et al.

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2006)
  • Y. Tan et al.

    Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul.

    (2008)
  • S. Abbasbandy

    Appl. Math. Model.

    (2008)
  • T. Hayat et al.

    Three-dimensional flow over a stretching surface in a viscoelastic fluid

    Nonlinear Anal. RWA

    (2008)
  • Cited by (111)

    • Analysis of time-fractional non-linear Kawahara Equations with power law kernel

      2022, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals: X
      Citation Excerpt :

      One can observe that the fractional derivative could provide a power-law estimate of the local performance of non-differentiable functions. In mathematics and physics, many numerical and analytical methods have been applied to study a variety of FDE’s, including the variational iteration, Adomian decomposition, sine-cosine, Exp-functions, Homotopy-perturbation, Finite element and Homotopy analysis [21–25] and q-homotopy analysis transform method (q-HATM) [26–28]. There are numerous convenient and useful transforms, for example, the Fourier transform, the integral transform, Laplace transform and so on has proposed to study several mathematical models.

    • Exact traveling wave solutions for nonlinear elastic rod equation

      2019, Journal of King Saud University - Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the numerical approaches, stability and convergence should specifically be considered and have still remained a serious challenge in order to avoid inappropriate or divergent outcomes (Abdi Aghdam and Kabir, 2010; Borhanifar et al., 2011; Kabir and Demirocak, 2017). However, in the recent decade, several efficient analytical and semi-analytical approaches were established and developed remarkably for solving NPDEs, consisting mainly of the homotopy analysis method (HAM) (Abbasbandy, 2010; Rashidi and Shahmohamadi, 2009), bilinear differential operator extension method (Lu and Ma, 2016; Lu et al., 2016a, 2016b, 2016c; Gao et al., 2016), Darboux transformation method (Lu and Lin, 2016), Madelung fluid description approach (Lu et al., 2016d), variational methods (Hashemi Kachapi et al., 2009; Helal and Seadawy, 2009; Seadawy, 2015a), the extended direct algebraic method (Seadawy and El-Rashidy, 2013; Seadawy, 2014, 2015b, 2016a, 2016b, 2017), the tanh method (Wazwaz, 2005), the differential transform method (DTM) (Biazar and Eslami, 2011), the Exp-function method (He and Wu, 2006; Borhanifar et al., 2009; Borhanifar and Kabir, 2009; Kabir and Khajeh, 2009; Kabir, 2011a; Kabir and Abdi Aghdam, 2012), the (G′/G)-expansion method (Wang et al., 2008; Kabir, 2011a; Kabir et al., 2011a; Kabir and Bagherzadeh, 2011; Kabir and Abdi Aghdam, 2012), and many others. Notwithstanding the rapidly burgeoning emergence of analytical methods, it is important to point out that most of these methods yield equivalent exact solutions to each other.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text