Short communication
New solitons and periodic solutions for nonlinear physical models in mathematical physics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2009.10.015Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we establish exact solutions for three nonlinear equations. The sine–cosine and the exp-function methods are used to construct periodic and soliton solutions of nonlinear physical models. Many new families of exact traveling wave solutions of the nonlinear wave equations are successfully obtained. These solutions may be of significance for the explanation of some practical physical problems. It is shown that the sine–cosine and the exp-function methods provide a powerful mathematical tool for solving a great many nonlinear partial differential equations in mathematical physics.

Introduction

Recently, the world around us has been inherently nonlinear [1]. Nonlinear evolution equations (NEEs) are widely used as models to describe complex physical phenomena in various fields of sciences, especially in fluid mechanics, solid state physics, plasma physics, plasma wave and chemical physics. Particularly, various methods have been utilized to explore different kinds of solutions of physical models described by nonlinear PDEs. One of the basic physical problems for those models is to obtain their traveling wave solutions. Quite a few methods for obtaining explicit traveling and solitary wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations have proposed a variety of powerful methods, such as tanh–sech method [2], [3], [4], [5], extended tanh method [6], [7], [8], [9], sine–cosine method [10], [11], [12], homogeneous balance method [13], [14], [15], Jacobi elliptic function method [16], [17], [18], F-expansion method [19], [20], [21] and exp-function method [22], [23], [24]. All these methods have been used to investigate nonlinear dispersive and dissipative problems.

Consider the nonlinear wave equation [25]utt+kuxx+lu+mu3=0, where k,l and m are constants. Eq. (1.1) contains some particular important equations such as Duffing, Klein–Gordon and Landau–Ginzburg–Higgs equation.

Let us consider the generalized Zakharov equations for the complex envelope φ(x,t) of the high-frequency wave and the real low-frequency field v(x,t) in the form [26] are: iφt+φxx2δ|φ|2φ+2φv=0,vttvxx+(|φ|2)xx=0, where the cubic term in (1.2) describes the nonlinear self-interaction in the high-frequency subsystem. This cubic term corresponds to a self-focusing effect in plasma physics. The coefficient δ is a real constant that can be a positive or negative number.

The (2 +1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson equations [26] reads iut+uxxuyy2|u|2u2uv=0,vxx+vyy+2(|u|2)xx=0. This equation which is completely integrable and used to describe the long-time evolution of a two-dimensional wave packet.

Our first interest in the present work is in implementing the sine–cosine method to stress its power in handling nonlinear equations, so that one can apply it to models of various types of nonlinearities. In Section 2, we describe this method for finding exact traveling wave solutions of nonlinear evolution equations. In Sections 3 The exp-function method, 4 The nonlinear wave equation, 5 The generalized Zakharov equations, we illustrate this method in detail with the nonlinear wave, the generalized Zakharov and the (2 +1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson equations. In Section 6, some conclusions are given.

Section snippets

Sine–cosine method

1. We introduce the wave variable ξ=x±ct into the PDE P(u,ut,ux,utt,uxx,uxt,)=0, where u(x,t) is traveling wave solution. This enables us to use the following changes t=cξ,2t2=c22ξ2,x=ξ,2x2=2ξ2,. One can immediately reduce the nonlinear PDE (2.1) into a nonlinear ODE Q(u,uξ,uξξ,uξξξ,)=0. The ordinary differential equation (2.3) is then integrated as long as all terms contain derivatives, where we neglect integration constants.

2. The solutions of many nonlinear equations can

The exp-function method

The exp-function method was first proposed by He and Wu in 2006 [23] and systematically studied in [24], [27] and was successfully applied to a KdV equation with variable coefficients [28], to a class of nonlinear partial differential equations [29], to Burgers and combine KdV–mKdV (extended KdV) equations [30], and to difference–differential equations [31], [32]. We consider a general nonlinear PDE in the form P(u,ut,ux,uxx,utt,)=0. Using a transformation ξ=kx+wt, where k and w are constants,

The nonlinear wave equation

We begin first with the nonlinear wave equation (1.1). Using the wave variable ξ=xct, Eq. (1.1) is carried to ODE (c2+k)u+lu+mu3=0. Substituting (2.4) into (4.1) gives (c2+k)[μ2λβ(β1)sinβ2(μξ)]μ2β2λsinβ(μξ)+lλsinβ(μξ)+mλ3sin3β(μξ)=0.

Equating the exponents and the coefficients of each pair of the sine functions we find the following system of algebraic equations: β(β1)0,β2=3β,λμ2β(β1)(c2+k)+mλ3=0,λμ2β2(c2+k)+λl=0. Solving the system (4.3) yields β=1,μ=lc2+k,λ=2lm.

The result (4.4) can

The generalized Zakharov equations

We next consider the generalized Zakharov equations (1.2). Let us assume the traveling wave solution of (1.2) has the form φ(x,t)=eiηu(ξ),v=v(ξ)n=αx+γt,ξ=k(x2αt), where u(ξ) and v(ξ) are real functions and the constants α,γ and k are to be determined. Substituting (5.1) into (1.2), we have k2u+2uv(α2+γ)u2δu3=0,k2(4α21)v+k2(u2)=0. Integrating the second equation in the system and neglecting constants of integration we find v=u214α2,if α214. Substituting (5.3) into the first equation of

The (2+1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson equations

We next consider the (2 +1)-dimensional Davey–Stewartson equations (1.3). Using the following wave variables u=eiθu(ξ),v=v(ξ)θ=px+qy+rt,ξ=kx+cy+dt, where p,q,r,k,c and d are real constants, converts (1.3) into the ODE (q2p2r)u+(k2c2)u2u32uv=0,(k2+c2)v+(u2)=0. Integrating the second equation in the system and neglecting constants of integration we find v=u2k2+c2.

Substituting (6.3) into the first equation of the system and integrating we find (q2p2r)u+(k2c2)u2u3+2u3k2+c2=0.

Conclusion

In this paper we have used the sine–cosine and exp-function methods to derive exact solutions with distinct physical structures. These methods with symbolic computation on the computer are used for constructing broad classes of periodic and soliton solutions of three nonlinear equations arising in nonlinear physics. The sine–cosine method was employed to establish single and periodic solutions. The exp-function method was used to determine soliton solutions for the same equation. The newly

References (33)

Cited by (0)

View full text