Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:00:46.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adjoint-triangle theorems for conservative functors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

G. B. Im
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 151, Korea.
G. M. Kelly
Affiliation:
Pure Mathematics Department, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An adjoint-triangle theorem contemplates functors P: CA and T: AB where T and TP have left adjoints, and gives sufficient conditions for P also to have a left adjoint. We are concerned with the case where T is conservative - that is, isomorphism-reflecting; then P has a left adjoint under various combinations of completeness or cocompleteness conditions on C and A, with no explicit condition on P itself. We list systematically the strongest results we know of in this direction, augmenting those in the literature by some new ones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1987

References

[1]Dubuc, E., “Adjoint triangles”, Lecture Notes in Math. 61 (1968), 6991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Huq, S.A., “An interpolation theorem for adjoint functors”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (1970), 880883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Im, G.B. and Kelly, G.M., “Some remarks on conservative functors with left adjoints”, J. Korean Math. Soc. 23 (1986), 1933.Google Scholar
[4]Kelly, G.M., “Monomorphisms, epimorphisms, and pullbacks”, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 9 (1969), 124142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kelly, G.M., Basic Concepts of Enriched Category Theory, (London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series 64, Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
[6]Kelly, G.M., “A survey of totality for enriched and ordinary categories”, Cahiers Topologie Géom. Différentielle, 27 (1986), 109132.Google Scholar