Skip to main content
Log in

A Hypergeometric Hierarchy for the Andrews Evaluations

  • Published:
The Ramanujan Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several 6F5(1) evaluations are given which generalize Andrews' 5F4(1) evaluations. All such evaluations are shown to be equivalent to transformations for a 4F3(z). The methodology allows for higher evaluations, for example an 8F7(1) is given which specializes to over one hundred 5F4(1) results, including all of Andrews'.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G.E. Andrews, “Pfaff's method (I): The Mills-Robbins-Rumsey determinant,” to appear in, Discrete Math.

  2. G.E. Andrews, “Pfaff's method (III): Comparison with the WZ method,” Elec. J. Comb. 3 (1996), 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Andrews and D. Stanton, “Determinants in plane partition enumeration,” to appear in, Eur. J. Comb.

  4. S. Ekhad and D. Zeilberger, “Curing the Andrews syndrome,” to appear in, J. Difference Eq. and Applications.

  5. G. Gasper and M. Rahman, Basic Hypergeometric Series, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

  6. M. Petkovsek and H. Wilf, “A high-tech proof of the Mills-Robbins-Rumsey determinant formula,” Elec. J. Comb. 3 (1996), 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanton, D. A Hypergeometric Hierarchy for the Andrews Evaluations. The Ramanujan Journal 2, 499–509 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009784911098

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009784911098

Navigation