Abstract
We develop a relativistic perspective on structures of quantum observables, in terms of localization systems of Boolean coordinatizing charts. This perspective implies that the quantum world is comprehended via Boolean reference frames for measurement of observables, pasted together along their overlaps. The scheme is formalized categorically, as an instance of the adjunction concept. The latter is used as a framework for the specification of a categorical equivalence signifying an invariance in the translational code of communication between Boolean localizing contexts and quantum systems. Aspects of the scheme semantics are discussed in relation to logic. The interpretation of coordinatizing localization systems, as structure sheaves, provides the basis for the development of an algebraic differential geometric machinery suited to the quantum regime.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Artin, M., Grothendieck, A., and Verdier, J. L. (1972). Theorie de topos et cohomologie etale des schemas (Springer LNM 269 and 270), Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Bell, J. L. (1985). Boolean-Valued Models and Independence Proofs in Set Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Bell, J. L. (1988). Toposes and Local Set Theories, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37, 823.
Butterfield, J. and Isham, C. J. (1998). A topos perspective on the Kochen–Specker theorem: I. Quantum states as generalized valuations. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 37, 2669.
Butterfield, J. and Isham, C. J. (1999). A topos perspective on the Kochen–Specker theorem: II. Conceptual aspects and classical analogues. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 38, 827.
Butterfield, J. and Isham, C. J. (2000). Some possible roles for topos theory in quantum theory and quantum gravity. Foundations of Physics 30, 1707.
Davis, M. (1977). A relativity principle in quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 16, 867.
Kochen, S. and Specker E. (1967). The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59.
Lawvere, F. W. (1975). Continuously variables sets: Algebraic geometry = Geometric logic. Proceedings of the Logic Colloquium in Bristol, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Lawvere, F. W. and Schanuel, S. H. (1997). Conceptual Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
MacLane, S. (1971). Categories for the Working Mathematician, Springer-Verlag, New York.
MacLane, S. and Moerdijk, I. (1992). Sheaves in Geometry and Logic, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Mallios, A. (1998). Geometry of Vector Sheaves: An Axiomatic Approach to Differential Geometry, Vols. 1–2, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Mallios, A. (2002). Remarks on singularities (gr-qc/0202028).
Raptis, I. (2001). Presheaves, sheaves, and their topoi in quantum gravity and quantum logic (gr-qc/0110064).
Rawling, J. P. and Selesnick, S. A. (2000). Orthologic and quantum logic. Models and computational elements. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 47, 721.
Takeuti, G. (1978). Two applications of logic to mathematics. Mathematical Society of Japan 13, Kano Memorial Lectures 3.
Varadarajan, V. S. (1968). Geometry of Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 1, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zafiris, E. Interpreting Observables in a Quantum World from the Categorial Standpoint. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 265–298 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000028863.07313.9c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000028863.07313.9c