Skip to Main Content

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society

Published by the American Mathematical Society since 1950, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is devoted to shorter research articles in all areas of pure and applied mathematics.

ISSN 1088-6826 (online) ISSN 0002-9939 (print)

The 2020 MCQ for Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society is 0.85.

What is MCQ? The Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) measures journal impact by looking at citations over a five-year period. Subscribers to MathSciNet may click through for more detailed information.

 

On a converse to Banach’s Fixed Point Theorem
HTML articles powered by AMS MathViewer

by Márton Elekes PDF
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 3139-3146 Request permission

Abstract:

We say that a metric space $(X,d)$ possesses the Banach Fixed Point Property (BFPP) if every contraction $f:X\to X$ has a fixed point. The Banach Fixed Point Theorem states that every complete metric space has the BFPP. However, E. Behrends pointed out in 2006 that the converse implication does not hold; that is, the BFPP does not imply completeness; in particular, there is a nonclosed subset of $\mathbb {R}^2$ possessing the BFPP. He also asked if there is even an open example in $\mathbb {R}^n$, and whether there is a ‘nice’ example in $\mathbb {R}$. In this note we answer the first question in the negative, the second one in the affirmative, and determine the simplest such examples in the sense of descriptive set theoretic complexity.

Specifically, first we prove that if $X\subset \mathbb {R}^n$ is open or $X\subset \mathbb {R}$ is simultaneously $F_\sigma$ and $G_\delta$ and $X$ has the BFPP, then $X$ is closed. Then we show that these results are optimal, as we give an $F_\sigma$ and also a $G_\delta$ nonclosed example in $\mathbb {R}$ with the BFPP.

We also show that a nonmeasurable set can have the BFPP. Our non-$G_\delta$ examples provide metric spaces with the BFPP that cannot be remetrized by any compatible complete metric. All examples are in addition bounded.

References
Similar Articles
Additional Information
  • Márton Elekes
  • Affiliation: Rényi Alfréd Institute of Mathematics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 127, H-1364 Budapest, Hungary – and – Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
  • Email: emarci@renyi.hu
  • Received by editor(s): February 2, 2007
  • Received by editor(s) in revised form: March 26, 2007
  • Published electronically: April 30, 2009
  • Additional Notes: The author was partially supported by Hungarian Scientific Foundation grants no. 43620, 49786, 61600, 72655, and the János Bolyai Fellowship.
  • Communicated by: Andreas Seeger
  • © Copyright 2009 American Mathematical Society
    The copyright for this article reverts to public domain 28 years after publication.
  • Journal: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 137 (2009), 3139-3146
  • MSC (2000): Primary 54H25, 47H10, 55M20, 03E15, 54H05; Secondary 26A16
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-09-09904-3
  • MathSciNet review: 2506473